Article I, Section II, Paragraph 3, the first sentence. Michael Montagne The 3/5 compromise is located in Article I, Section 2, Sentence 1, and gives directions on how people are to be counted for the national census: Free people and (white) indentured servants=1, Indians not taxed=0, "other persons (i.e., slaves)=3/5)
Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3
The 'Three-Fifths' in the 'Three-Fifths Compromise' refers to the fact that it was agreed that slaves would each count as three-fifths of a person. In other words, for every five slaves, three of them counted as people. After the 'Great Compromise,' having a large population would determine how many electoral votes each state would have, how many votes in the House of Representatives each state would have, and how much each state would pay in taxes. By counting slaves in their population, the South would gain more political power but would pay more in taxes, which they were willing to do. The North disagreed because they felt that slaves should not count as people because they did not have the rights that free people hold. If the South wanted these crucial additions to their population, the slaves would have to be free. Both sides disagreed, so they were forced to compromise. They agreed that slaves would count as three-fifths of a person. As far as your one-half or two-thirds comments, I do not know where you could find information as to why they settled on one number instead of another. It was the process used to decide the number of representatives that could be elected to the House of Representatives by Southern states and the distribution of tax revenue. Each slave was counted as three-fifths of a person" rather than a whole individual in an attempt to keep Southern slave owners from gaining substantial power in government and financial advantage in the apportioning of taxes. After agreeing on how many seats the House would hold would be based on population, they needed to decide if the slave population be counted. Most of the south was for the counting of slaves and most of the north was opposed. Finally the founders concluded that every free person should be counted and that 3/5 of the slaves would be counted. This 3/5 was also used in fixing the amount of money to be raised in each state by a direct tax. The southerners won the count of their slaves but they would now end up paying more for them. Representation of slaves was debated in the Continental Congress at the time of the creation of the Articles of Confederation. The North favored a 4-to-3 ratio, while southerners favored a 2-to-1 or 4-to-1 ratio. James Madison proposed a compromise-- a 5-to-3 ratio. All but two states agreed on the compromise figure. But, since the Articles required all states to approve such enactment, the issue was defeated. When the delegates to the Constitutional Convention met in 1787, they decided upon the representation of slaves and the three-fifths figure that Madison had suggested earlier. Because 3 out of 5 is a majority. 1 out of 2 is just half.
Find two fifths as a decimal 0.4 ten divide that by 21,000 Answer is 52500
One can find a form for an Offer in Compromise on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) website. There are different forms for personal and business debts and full instructions are given.
It was important for the delegates to find ways to compromise because lack of compromise could lead to fascism or a dictatorship. There needs to be different side and ideas to be considered when figuring out problems.
That's a really good question. It has to do with people in general. No two people will agree about everything. Compromise is important when setting up a new nation so that you can start our peacefully.
To find three fifths of 50, divide 50 by five then multiply by three. The answer is 30.
First divide 365 into 5 = 73 Now multiply by 3 to find three fifths: 73 x 3 = 219. To find a fraction of an amount divide by the denominator and multiply by the numerator.
The small state benefited from that cuz.....big states did want to share their power equally ....So small states protested that to prevent this problem they established bicameral ( tow houses )..... :) I hope this is help full for you..
Divide 1600 by 5 and then multiply by 3 and you will get the answer of 960.
one fifth is 3.2m. so one three-fifths piece is 9.6m and the two-fifths piece is 5.4m
12go to ourworld our world rocks find ur answer there cya
Two fifths is larger than three tenths because when you find the LCD (lowest common denominator) between the two, it is 4 tenths (two fifths) and 3 tenths.
1) Balancing power between the state Governments and the Federal Government. -Too much power would lead to the problems the country faced under the Articles of Confederation. -But too much Federal power could result in an oppressive government that trampled the rights of the states and the people. 2) Balancing the power of the small and large states. -Should a larger state with a larger population have a greater say in the federal government, or should all states be treated equally. 3) What to do about slavery -Delegates from the North wanted the federal government to have the power to limit slavery, or at least the slave trade, but Delegates from the South wanted protection for the institution of slavery, which they thought was essential to their states' economics.
3/5 * 5 = 3 To find this you can write out the ratios : 3/5 * 5/1 = 15/5 = 3
24 you work it out like this: 40 divided by 5 is 8 which is equal to one fifth then 8x3 to find out 3 fifths.
3/5 (three fifths) in decimal form is 0.6 by diving 1 (1.0) byt the number of parts in the fraction (5) you can deterine one part being equal to 0.2 as there are three parts of the fraction in use to find the decimal representation of 3/5 you then multiply 0.2 by 3
3/8 + 3/5 = 15/40 + 24/40 = 39/40 39/40 is the simplest form