He didn't convert Hinduism to Buddhsm. He simply offered an option to Hindu beliefs that was eventually called Buddhism. While the two religions spring from the same cultural background and have several iconographic and concept similarities they also have significant differences with the role of gods and importance of the Caste System.
Buddhism was founded by the Buddha, and nobody knows who founded Hinduism.
Buddhism was devloped from Hinduism by Lord Buddha. Lord buddha was a Hindu prince by birth.
buddha introduced Buddhism in India.
It didn't; the buddha was a Hindu who started Buddhism
No. It was the other way around. Buddha was Hindu. Hinduism came before Buddhism.
That is how I see it too since Gautama Buddha was a Hindu prince. The teachings in Buddhism is parallel to the Hinduism.
Hinduism was never made by a particular man. meanwhile Buddhism was founded by lord buddha, A Hindu king and saint.
Hinduism believes in a Supreme Creator, while Buddhism does not. Buddhism also follows the teachings of Buddha, while Hinduism does not, thought they would probably still respect him as a wise individual.
Buddhism was invented from Hinduism by Lord Buddha. They both relate India laws of Moksha (liberation) or Nirvana (Liberation).
Buddha was against a few practices of Hinduism, like sacrifices, rituals, and castes. But he emphasized on the concept of 'dharma' just like hindus. Hinduism and Buddhism did not fight each other. Actually, for a long period of time Buddhism was like a sect of Hinduism.
Hinduism is a bit different from buddhism. hinduism worships many gods and goddess. while in buddhism there is no worshiping to god. also buddhism forbids violence. while hinduism permits violence when dharma is in danger. hinduism was never found by man while buddhism was found by lord buddha or siddhartha.
Rather ironically, as Buddha was from India, Hinduism is far more common in India.