- This article is about the moon of Jupiter. For other meanings, see Callisto.
- There is also an asteroid named 204
Kallisto.
Callisto (kə-lis'-toe, IPA: /kəˈlɪstoʊ/; Greek Καλλιστώ) is a moon of the planet Jupiter, discovered in 1610 by
Galileo Galilei.[1] It is the third largest moon in the
Solar System and the second largest in the Jovian system, after Ganymede. Callisto has about 99% the diameter of the planet Mercury but is much less massive. It is the fourth Galilean
moon of Jupiter by distance, with an orbital radius of about 1,880,000 kilometers.[2] It does not form part of the orbital
resonance that affects three inner Galilean satellites, Io, Europa and Ganymede, and thus does not experience appreciable
tidal heating.[9] Callisto rotates synchronously with its
orbital period, so the same face is always turned toward Jupiter. Callisto's surface is less affected by Jupiter's
magnetosphere than the other inner satellites because
it orbits further away.[10]
Callisto is composed of approximately equal amounts of rock and ices, with a mean density of about 1.83 g/cm³. Compounds detected
spectrally on the surface include water ice,
carbon dioxide, silicates, and organics. Investigation by the Galileo spacecraft revealed that
Callisto may have a small silicate core and possibly a
subsurface ocean of liquid water at depths greater than 100 kilometers.[11][12]
The surface of Callisto is heavily cratered and extremely old. It does not show any signatures of sub-surface processes such as plate tectonics,
earthquakes or volcanoes, and is thought to have evolved
predominantly under the influence of impacts.[13] Prominent surface features include multi-ring structures, variously
shaped impact craters, and chains of craters (catenae) and associated scarps, ridges and deposits.[13] At a small scale, the surface is varied and consists of small bright frost
deposits at the tops of elevations, surrounded by a low-lying, smooth blanket of
dark material.[5] This is thought to
result from the sublimation-driven degradation of small landforms, which is supported by the general deficit of small impact craters and the presence of numerous small
knobs, considered to be their remnants.[14] The absolute ages of the landforms are not known.
Callisto is surrounded by an extremely thin atmosphere composed of carbon dioxide[7] and probably molecular oxygen.[8], as well as by a rather intense
ionosphere.[15] Callisto is thought to have formed by slow accretion from the disk of the gas and dust that surrounded Jupiter after its
formation.[16] Its slowness and the lack
of tidal heating prevented rapid differentiation. The slow convection in the interior of
Callisto, which commenced soon after formation, led to partial differentiation and possibly to the formation of a subsurface
ocean at the depth 100–150 kilometers and a small rocky core.[17]
The likely presence of an ocean within Callisto indicates that it can or could harbor life. However, this is less likely than on nearby Europa.[18]
Various space probes from Pioneers10–11 to Galileo and Cassini have studied the moon. Callisto has
long been considered the most suitable place for a human base for future exploration of the system of Jupiter.[19]
Discovery and naming
Callisto was discovered by Galileo in January 1610 along with three other large Jovian moons, Ganymede, Io, and Europa.[1] Callisto is named after one of Zeus's many lovers in Greek mythology. The name was suggested by
Simon Marius soon after the moon's discovery. [20] Marius attributed the suggestion to Johannes
Kepler.[21] However, the names of the
Galilean satellites fell into disfavor for a considerable time, and were not revived in
common use until the mid-20th century. In much of the earlier astronomical literature,
Callisto is referred to by its Roman numeral designation—a system introduced by Galileo—Jupiter IV or as "the fourth satellite of Jupiter".[22] In scientific writing, the adjectival
form of the name is Callistoan,[23] or Callistan.[14] The former is used henceforth.
Orbit and rotation
Callisto is the outermost of the four Galilean moons of Jupiter. It orbits at a distance of approximately 1,880,000 km
(26.3 times the 71,398 km radius of Jupiter itself).[2] This is significantly larger than the orbital radius—1,070,000 km—of the next closest
Galilean satellite, Ganymede. As a result of this relatively distant orbit, Callisto does not participate in the mean motion resonance, which the three inner Galilean satellites are locked in, and probably never
has.[9]
Like most other inner planetary moons, Callisto's rotation is locked to be
synchronous with its orbit.[4] The length of the Callistoan day, simultaneously its orbital period, is about 16.7 Earth days. Its orbit is very slightly eccentric and inclined to the Jovian
equator, with the eccentricity and
inclination changing quasi-periodically
due to solar and planetary gravitational perturbations on a timescale of centuries. The ranges of change are 0.0072—0.0076 and
0.20–0.06°, respectively.[9] These
orbital variations cause the axial tilt (the angle between rotational and orbital axes) to
vary between 0.4 and 1.6°.[24]
The dynamic isolation of Callisto means that it has never been appreciably tidally
heated, which has had important consequences for its internal structure and evolution.[25] Its
distance from Jupiter also means that the charged particle flux from the planet's magnetosphere at its surface is relatively low —
about 300 times lower than, for example, that at Europa. Hence, unlike for the other
Galilean moons, charged particle irradiation has had a relatively minor effect on the
Callistoan surface.[10]
Physical characteristics
Composition
Near-infrared spectrum of a cratered plains area (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
The average density of Callisto, 1.83 g/cm³,[4] suggests a composition of approximately equal parts of rocky material
and water ice, with some additional volatile ices such as ammonia.[11] The mass
fraction of ices is between 49–55%.[11][17] The exact composition of Callisto's rock component
is not known, but is probably close to the composition of L/LL type ordinary
chondrites, which are characterized by less total iron, less metallic iron
and more iron oxide than H chondrites. The weight ratio
of iron to silicon is 0.9-1.3 in Callisto, whereas the solar ratio
is around 1.8.[11]
Callisto's surface has an albedo about 20%[5]. Its surface composition is thought to be broadly similar to its
composition as a whole. Near-infrared spectroscopy has
revealed the presence of water ice absorption bands at wavelengths 1.04, 1.25, 1.5, 2.0
and 3.0 micrometers.[5] Water ice seems to be ubiquitous on the surface of Callisto, with a mass fraction of
25–50%.[12] The analysis of high
resolution near-infrared and UV spectra obtained by the Galileo spacecraft and from the ground
has revealed various non-ice materials: magnesium- and iron-bearing hydrated silicates,[5] carbon dioxide,[26] sulfur
dioxide,[27] and possibly
ammonia and various organic compounds.[12][5] Spectral data indicate that the planet's surface is extremely
heterogeneous at the small scale. Small, bright patches of pure water ice are intermixed with patches of a rock-ice mixture and
extended dark areas made of a non-ice material.[5][13]
The Callistoan surface is asymmetric: the leading hemisphere—the hemisphere facing the direction of the orbital
motion—[28] is darker than trailing one. This is
different from other Galilean satellites, where the reverse is true.[5] The trailing hemisphere of Callisto appears
to be enriched in carbon dioxide, while the leading hemisphere has more sulfur dioxide.[29] Many fresh impact craters like Lofn also show enrichment in carbon dioxide.[29] Overall the chemical composition of the
surface, especially in the dark areas, may be close to that seen on D-type
asteroids,[13] whose
surfaces are made of carbonaceous material.
Internal structure
Interior of Callisto (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
Callisto's battered surface lies on top of a cold, stiff, and icy lithosphere that is
between 80 and 150 kilometers thick.[17][11] A salty ocean 50–200 kilometers deep may lie beneath
the crust,[17][11] indicated by studies of the magnetic fields around
Jupiter and its moons.[30][31] It was found that Callisto responds to
Jupiter's varying background magnetic field like a perfectly conducting sphere;
that is, the field can not penetrate inside the moon, suggesting a layer of highly conductive fluid within it with thickness at least 10 km.[31] The existence of an ocean is more likely if water contains a
small amount of ammonia or other antifreeze, up to 5% by
weight.[17] In this case the ocean can
be as thick as 250–300 km.[11]
Failing an ocean, the icy lithosphere may be somewhat thicker, up to about 300 km.
Beneath the lithosphere and putative ocean, Callisto's interior appears to be neither entirely uniform nor particularly
variable. Galileo orbiter data[4] (especially the dimensionless moment of inertia[32] – 0.3549 ±
0.0042 determined during close fly-bys) suggest that its interior is composed of compressed rocks and ices, with the amount of rock increasing with depth due to partial
settling of its constituents.[33][11] In other words Callisto is only partially differentiated. The density and moment of inertia are compatible with the existence of a small
silicate core in the center of the satellite. The radius of any such core cannot exceed
600 km, and the density may lie between 3.1–3.6 g/cm³.[4][11]
Surface features
Cratered plains (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
The ancient surface of Callisto is one of the most heavily cratered in the solar system.[34] In fact, the crater density is
close to saturation: any new crater will tend to erase an older one. The large scale
geology is relatively simple; there are no large Callistoan mountains, volcanoes or other
endogenic tectonic features.[35] The impact craters and multi-ring
structures—together with associated fractures, scarps and deposits—are the only large features to be found on
the surface.[13][35]
Callisto's surface can be divided into several geologically different parts: cratered plains, light plains, bright smooth
plains, and various units associated with particular multi-ring structures and impact craters.[35][13] The cratered plains constitute most of the surface area and represent the ancient
lithosphere, a mixture of ice and rocky material. The light plains include bright impact craters like Burr and Lofn, as well as the effaced remnants of old craters
called palimpsests,[36]
the central parts of multi-ring structures, and isolated patches in the cratered plains.[13] These light plains are thought to be icy impact deposits. The
bright smooth plains constitute a small fraction of the Callistoan surface and are found in the ridge and trough zones of the Valhalla and Asgard formations and as isolated spots in the cratered plains. They were believed to be connected with
endogenic activity but the high resolution Galileo images showed that the bright smooth plains correlate with heavily
fractured and knobby terrain and do not show any signs of resurfacing.[13] The Galileo images also revealed small, dark smooth areas with overall
coverage less than 10000 km², which appear to embay[37] the surrounding terrain. They are possible cryovolcanic deposits.[13] Both the light and the various smooth plains are somewhat younger and less cratered than
the background cratered plains.[13][38]
Impact crater Har with a central dome (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
Impact crater diameters seen range from 0.1 km—a limit defined by the imaging
resolution—to over 100 km, not counting the multi-ring structures.[13] Small craters, with diameters less than 5 km, have simple bowl
or flat floored shapes. Those 5–40 km across usually have a central peak. Larger impact features, with diameters in the
range 25–100 km, have central pits instead of peaks, such as Tindr crater.[13] The largest craters with diameters
over 60 km can have central domes, which are thought to result from central tectonic
uplift after an impact;[13]
examples include Doh and Har craters. A small
number of very large—more 100 km in diameter—and bright impact craters show anomalous dome geometry. These are unusually
shallow and may be a transitional landform to the multi-ring structures, as with the
Lofn impact feature.[13] Callistoan craters are generally shallower than those on the Moon.
Valhalla multi-ring structure (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
The largest impact features on the Callistoan surface are multi-ring basins.[35][13] Two are enormous. Valhalla is the largest,
with a bright central region 600 kilometers in diameter, and rings extending as far as 1800 kilometers from the center
(see figure).[39] The second largest is
Asgard, measuring about 1600 kilometers in diameter.[39] Multi-ring structures probably originated as a result of a
post-impact concentric fracturing of the lithosphere lying on a layer of soft or liquid
material, possibly an ocean.[23] The catenae—for example Gomul Catena—are long
chains of impact craters lined up in straight lines across the surface. They were probably created by objects that were tidally
disrupted as they passed close to Jupiter prior to the impact on Callisto, or by very oblique
impacts.[13] A historical example
of a disruption was Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9.
As mentioned above, small patches of pure water ice with an albedo as high as 80% are found on
the surface of Callisto, surrounded by much darker material.[5] High resolution Galileo images showed the
bright patches to be predominately located on elevated surface features: crater
rims, scarps, ridges and knobs.[5] They are likely to be thin water frost deposits. Dark material usually lies in the lowlands
surrounding and mantling bright features and appears to be smooth. It often forms patches up to 5 km across within the
crater floors and in the intercrater depressions.[5]
Landslides and small knobs (Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech)
On a small kilometer scale the surface of Callisto is more degraded than the surfaces of other icy galilean moons.[5] Typically there is a deficit of small impact craters
with diameters less than 1 km as compared with, for instance, the dark plains on Ganymede.[13] Instead of small craters, the almost ubiquitous surface features are small knobs and
pits.[5] The knobs are thought to
represent remnants of crater rims degraded by an as-yet uncertain process.[14] The most likely candidate process is the slow sublimation of ice, which is enabled by a temperature of up to 165 kelvins, reached at a subsolar point.[5] Such sublimation of water or other volatiles from the
dirty ice that is the bedrock causes its decomposition. The non-ice remnants form
debris avalanches descending from the slopes of the crater walls.[14] Such avalanches are often observed near and inside impact craters
and termed ‘debris aprons’.[5][14][13] Sometimes crater walls are cut by sinuous valley-like incisions
called ‘gullies’, which resemble certain martian surface features.[5] In the ice sublimation hypothesis, the low-lying dark material is
interpreted as a blanket of primarily non-ice debris, which originated from the degraded rims of craters and has covered a predominantly icy bedrock.
The relative ages of the different surface units on Callisto can be determined from the density of impact craters on them. The older the surface, the denser the crater population.[40] Absolute dating has not been carried
out, but based on theoretical considerations, the cratered plains are thought to be ~4.5 billion years old, dating back almost to the formation of the solar
system. The ages of multi-ring structures and impact craters depend on chosen background cratering rates and are estimated
by different authors to vary between 1 and 4 billion years.[34][13]
Atmosphere and ionosphere
Callisto has a very tenuous atmosphere composed of carbon dioxide.[7] It was detected by the Galileo
Near Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (NIMS) from its absorption feature near the wavelength 4.2 micrometers. The surface pressure is estimated to be 7.5 ×10-12 bar and particle density – 4×108 cm-3. Because such a thin atmosphere would be
lost in only about 4 days (see atmospheric escape), it must be constantly
being replenished, possibly by slow sublimation of carbon dioxide ice from the satellite's icy crust, [7] which would be compatible with the
sublimation hypothesis for the formation of the bright surface knobs.
Callisto's ionosphere was first detected during Galileo flybys;[15] its high electron density of 7–17×104 cm-3
cannot be explained by the photoionization of the atmospheric carbon dioxide alone.
Hence, it is suspected that the atmosphere of Callisto is actually dominated by molecular oxygen
(10–100 times more of this than CO2) [8] However oxygen has not yet been directly detected in the
atmosphere of Callisto. Observations with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) placed
an upper limit on its possible concentration in the atmosphere, based on lack of detection, which is still compatible with the
ionospheric measurements.[41] At the
same time HST was able to detect condensed oxygen trapped on the surface
of Callisto.[42]
Origin and evolution
Knobby terrain (credit: NASA/JPL/Arizona State University)
The partial differentiation of Callisto (inferred e.g. from moment of
inertia measurements) means that it has never been heated enough to melt its ice component.[17] Therefore the most favorable model of its formation is a slow
accretion in the low density Jupiter’s subnebula—a disk of the gas and dust that existed around Jupiter after its formation.[16] Such a prolonged accretion stage would allow
cooling to largely keep up with the heat accumulation caused by impacts, radioactive decay and contraction, thereby preventing
melting and fast differentiation.[16]The
allowable timescale of formation of Callisto lies then in the range 0.1–10 million years.[16]
The further evolution of Callisto after accretion was determined by the
balance of the radioactive heating, cooling through thermal conduction near the surface, and solid state or subsolidus convection in the interior.[25] Details of the subsolidus convection in the ice is the main source of uncertainty in the
models of all icy moons. It is known to develop when the temperature is sufficiently close to the melting point, due to the
temperature dependence of ice viscosity.[43] Subsolidus convection in icy bodies is a slow process with ice
motions of the order of 1 cm/year, but is, in fact, a very effective cooling mechanism on long timescales.[43] It is thought to proceed in the
so-called "stagnant lid" regime, where a stiff cold outer layer of the moon, conducts heat without convection, while the ice
beneath it convects in the subsolidus regime [17][43] For Callisto, the outer conductive layer corresponds to the cold and rigid
lithosphere with a thickness of about 100 km. Its presence would explain the lack of
any signs of the endogenic activity on the Callistoan surface.[43][44] The convection in the interior parts of Callisto may be layered, because
under the high pressures found there, water ice exists in different crystalline phases beginning
from the ice I on the surface to ice VII in the center.[25] The early onset of subsolidus convection
in the Callistoan interior could have prevented large scale ice melting, any resulting differentiation that would have otherwise formed a large rocky core and icy mantle. Due to the convection process,
however, very slow and partial separation and differentiation of rocks and ices inside Callisto has been proceeding on timescales
of billions of years and may be continuing to this day.[44]
The current understanding of the evolution of Callisto allows for the existence of a layer, an "ocean", of liquid water in its
interior. This is connected with the anomalous behavior of the Ice I phase's melting temperature, which decreases with pressure, achieving
temperatures as low as 251 kelvins at 2070 bar.[17] In all
realistic models of Callisto the temperature in the layer between 100–200 km in depth is very close to, or exceeds slightly,
this anomalous melting temperature.[25][43][44] The presence of even small amounts of ammonia—about
1–2 weight%—almost guarantees the liquid's existence because ammonia would lower the melting temperature even
further.[17]
While Callisto is very similar in bulk properties to Ganymede, it apparently had a
much simpler geological history. The surface appears to have formed mainly under the
influence of impacts and other exogenic forces.[13] Unlike neighbouring Ganymede with its grooved terrain, there is little evidence of the tectonic activity.[12] The relatively simple geological history
of Callisto is important for planetary scientists, with Callisto having the potential to serve as a good base reference for
comparison with other more complex worlds.[12]
Possibility of life in the ocean
Like with Europa and Ganymede, the idea has
been brought up that extraterrestrial microbial life may exist in a salty ocean
under the Callistoan surface.[18] However
the conditions for life appear to be less favourable on Callisto than on Europa. The
principal reasons are: the lack of contact with rocky material and the lower heat flux from the interior of Callisto.[18] Scientist Torrence Johnson said the
following about comparing the odds of life on Callisto with the odds on other Galilean
moons:[45]
| “ |
The basic ingredients for life—what we call 'pre-biotic chemistry'—are abundant in
many solar system objects, such as comets, asteroids and icy moons. Biologists believe liquid water and energy are then needed to
actually support life, so it's exciting to find another place where we might have liquid water. But, energy is another matter,
and currently, Callisto's ocean is only being heated by radioactive elements, whereas Europa has tidal energy as well, from its
greater proximity to Jupiter. |
” |
Based on the considerations mentioned above and on other scientific observations, it is thought that of all of Jupiter's
Galilean moons, Europa has the greatest chance of
supporting microbial life.[18][46]
Exploration
Artist's impression of a human base on Callisto in the future
[47]
The Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 Jupiter encounters in
the early 1970s contributed little new information about Callisto in comparison with what was already known from Earth-based
observations.[5] The real breakthrough
happened later with the Voyager 1 and 2 flybys in
1979–1980. They imaged more than half of the Callistoan surface with a resolution 1–2 km, and precisely measured its
temperature, mass and shape.[5] A second
round of exploration lasted from 1994 to 2003, whjen the Galileo spacecraft had
eight close encounters with Callisto, the last flyby during the C30 orbit in 2001 came as close as 138 km to the surface.
The Galileo orbiter completed the global imaging of the surface and delivered a number of pictures with a resolution as high as
15 meters of selected areas of Callisto.[13] In 2000, the Cassini spacecraft enroute to
Saturn acquired high quality infrared spectra of the Galilean satellites including
Callisto.[26] In February-March 2007, the
New Horizons probe on its way to Pluto obtained new images and spectra of Callisto.[48]
- See also: Colonization of
Callisto
In 2003 NASA conducted a conceptual study called "Human Outer Planets Exploration" (HOPE) regarding the future human
exploration of the outer solar system. The target chosen to consider in detail was
Callisto.[19] It was proposed that it could be
possible to build a surface base on Callisto that would produce fuel for further exploration of the solar system.[47] Advantages of this localization
include the low radiation at Callisto's distance from Jupiter, and Callisto's geological stability. A base there could facilitate
remote exploration of Europa, or be an ideal location for a Jovian system waystation
servicing spacecraft heading farther into the outer Solar System, using a gravity assist from a close fly-by of Jupiter after
departing Callisto.[19]
See also
Notes and references
- ^ a b c d
- ^ a b c d e f
- ^ a b c d e f g
- ^ a b c
d e f
g h i
Anderson, J. D.; Jacobson, R. A.; McElrath, T. P.; et al. (2001). "Shape, mean radius, gravity field and
interior structure of Callisto". Icarus 153: 157–161. DOI:10.1006/icar.2001.6664.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s
- ^ Classic Satellites of the Solar System. Observatorio ARVAL. Retrieved on 2007-07-13.
- ^ a b c
d e
- ^ a b c
- ^ a b c
- ^ a b
- ^ a b c d e f g h i
- ^ a b c d e
- ^ a b c
d e
f g
h i
j k l
m n o
p q r
s t u
- ^ a b c d e
- ^ a b
- ^ a b c d
- ^ a b c d e f g h i
- ^ a b c d
- ^ a b c
- ^ Marius, S.; Mundus Iovialis anno M.DC.IX Detectus Ope Perspicilli Belgici (1614)
- ^ Satellites of
Jupiter. The Galileo Project. Retrieved on 2007-07-31.
- ^ Barnard, E. E.
(1892). "Discovery and Observation of a Fifth Satellite to Jupiter". Astronomical Journal 12:
81–85.
- ^ a b Klemaszewski, J.A.; Greeley, R. (2001). Geological Evidence for an Ocean on
Callisto 1818. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI.
- ^ Bills, Bruce G. (2005).
"Free and forced obliquities of
the Galilean satellites of Jupiter" 175: 233–247. DOI:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.10.028.
- ^ a b c d
- ^ a b
- ^ Noll, K.S. (1996). Detection of SO2 on
Callisto with the Hubble Space Telescope 1852. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI.
- ^ Leading hemisphere is a hemisphere looking in the direction of
the orbital motion, the trailing hemisphere looks in the reverse direction
- ^ a b Hibbitts, C.A.; McCord, T. B.; Hansen, G.B. (1998). Distributions of CO2 and
SO2 on the Surface of Callisto 1908. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI.
- ^ Khurana, K. K.;
et al. (1998). "Induced magnetic fields as evidence for subsurface oceans in Europa and Callisto". Nature 395: 777–780.
DOI:10.1038/27394.
- ^ a b Zimmer, C.; Khurana, K. K. (2000).
"Subsurface
Oceans on Europa and Callisto: Constraints from Galileo Magnetometer Observations". Icarus 147: 329–347.
DOI:10.1006/icar.2000.6456.
- ^ The dimensionless moment of inertia referred to is I/(mr²), where I is the
Moment of Inertia, m the mass, and r the maximal
radius. It is 0.4 for a homogenous spherical body, but less than 0.4 if density increases with
depth.
- ^ Anderson, J. D.;
Schubert, G.; Jacobson, R. A.; et al. (1998). "Distribution of
Rock, Metals and Ices in Callisto". Science 280: 1573–1576. DOI:10.1126/science.280.5369.1573.
- ^ a b Zahnle, K.; Dones, L. (1998). "Cratering Rates on the
Galilean Satellites". Icarus 136: 202–222. DOI:10.1006/icar.1998.6015.
- ^ a b c d Bender, K. C.; Rice, J. W.; Wilhelms, D. E.; Greeley, R. (1997).
"Geological map of Callisto". U.S. Geological Survey.
- ^ In the case of icy satellites palimpsests are defined as bright circular
surface features, probably old impact craters, see Greeley et.al. 2000
- ^ embay: to shut in, or shelter, as in a bay
- ^ Wagner, R.; Neukum,
G.; Greeley, R; et al. (March 12–16, 2001). "Fractures, Scarps, and Lineaments on Callisto and their Correlation with Surface Degradation".
32nd Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.
- ^ a b U.S. Geological Survey. Controlled Photomosaic Map of Callisto JC 15M
CMN [map], 2002 edition.
- ^ Chapman, C.R.; Merline, W.J.; Bierhaus, B.; et.al.
(1997). Populations of Small
Craters on Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto: Initial Galileo Imaging Results 1221. Lunar and Planetary Science XXXI.
- ^ Strobel, Darrell F.;
Saur, Joachim; Feldman, Paul D.; et.al. (2002). "Hubble Space Telescope Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Search for an Atmosphere on Callisto:
a Jovian Unipolar Inductor" 581: L51-L54. DOI:10.1086/345803.
- ^ Spencer, John R.;
Calvin, Wendy M. (2002). "Condensed O2 on Europa and Callisto" 124: 3400–3403. DOI:10.1086/344307.
- ^ a b c
d e
- ^ a b c
- ^ Phillips, T. (23 October, 1998). Callisto makes a big
splash. Science@NASA.
- ^ François, Raulin (2005). "Exo-Astrobiological
Aspects of Europa and Titan: from Observations to speculations" 116: 47