Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

global warming

 
Dictionary: global warming
Home > Library > Literature & Language > Dictionary

n.

An increase in the average temperature of the earth's atmosphere, especially a sustained increase sufficient to cause climatic change.


Search unanswered questions...

Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics

Geography Dictionary: global warming
Top
Home > Library > Science > Geographical Dictionary

The increase in global temperatures brought about by the increased emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. There is no doubt that concentrations of, for example, atmospheric carbon dioxide have risen since the 1950s; what is less certain is the extent to which this has altered the earth's climates, or the extent to which climates will change in the future. see greenhouse effect.

Political Dictionary: global warming
Top
Home > Library > History, Politics & Society > Political Dictionary

A phenomenon (otherwise known as ‘climate change’ or ‘the greenhouse effect’) whereby solar radiation that has reflected back off the surface of the earth remains trapped at atmospheric levels, due to the build-up of CO2 and other greenhouse gases, rather than being emitted back into space. The effect of this is a warming of the global atmosphere.

Climate change is a long-standing phenomenon, as the mix of the various gases that make up the earth's atmosphere have changed over long periods of time, so average global temperatures have fluctuated. What is alleged to be different about the current spell of global warming is that it is taken to be (1) caused by human action and (2) occurring at an unprecedented rate. The consequences of global warming remain uncertain, but climate change models predict deforestation, desertification, a poleward shift of vegetation and animal populations, rising sea levels, and decreased precipitation.

Global warming has received increasing political attention over the past thirty years, having constituted one of the key themes in the rise of green politics over the same period. This increasing political salience resulted in an intergovernmental meeting in Kyoto in 1997, at which 38 industrialized countries signed up to the Kyoto Protocol. The terms of this agreement were that these nations would reduce their atmospheric emissions of CO2 by an average of 5.2 per cent from 1990 levels by 2012. This is well below the 60 per cent target that scientists working on climate change claim is necessary to present further global warming, but the agreement was seen by many campaigners as a useful first step that established the framework necessary for further cuts in the future. The Kyoto Protocol will not, however, become effective until it has been ratified by 55 per cent of the signatory nations, and only then if these nations contribute 55 per cent or more of global carbon emissions.

There have been three crucial intergovernmental meetings in the attempt to transform the original protocol into a ratified treaty with legal powers of enforcement. The first of these was at The Hague in November 2000. This meeting broke down over disagreements between the European Union (EU) and the United States—in particular over American proposals to count forests and other vegetation as ‘carbon sinks’, against which their fossil fuel emissions could be set. The EU feared that this would create significant loopholes in the agreement, as the carbon storage capacity of vegetation is uncertain, temporary, and unstable. Following the election of George W. Bush the United States unilaterally withdrew from the Kyoto Protocol, claiming that it would inflict disproportionate damage on the US economy. Given that the US produces 24 per cent of global CO2 emissions, its non-participation in any binding agreement remains a serious handicap.

Further climate change negotiations took place in Bonn in July 2001, involving 186 nations, where the Kyoto protocols were successfully translated into an international treaty. In order to achieve agreement the EU nations had to make concessions to Canada, Australia, Japan, and Russia over the extent to which forests could count as ‘carbon sinks’, and over the mechanisms by which any agreement could be enforced. By some estimates this cut the effective size of emission reductions from the proposed 5.2 per cent on 1990 levels to between 1.8 and 3 per cent.

— Mathew Humphrey

Britannica Concise Encyclopedia: global warming
Top
Home > Library > Miscellaneous > Britannica Concise Encyclopedia

Increase in the global average surface temperature resulting from enhancement of the greenhouse effect, primarily by air pollution. In 2007 the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change forecasted that by 2100 global average surface temperatures would increase 3.2 – 7.2 °F (1.8 – 4.0 °C), depending on a range of scenarios for greenhouse gas emissions, and stated that it was now 90 percent certain that most of the warming observed over the previous half century could be attributed to greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activities (i.e., industrial processes and transportation). Many scientists predict that such an increase in temperature would cause polar ice caps and mountain glaciers to melt rapidly, significantly raising the levels of coastal waters, and would produce new patterns and extremes of drought and rainfall, seriously disrupting food production in certain regions. Other scientists maintain that such predictions are overstated. The 1992 Earth Summit and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change attempted to address the issue of global warming, but in both cases the efforts were hindered by conflicting national economic agendas and disputes between developed and developing nations over the cost and consequences of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.

For more information on global warming, visit Britannica.com.

US History Encyclopedia: Global Warming
Top
Home > Library > History, Politics & Society > US History Encyclopedia

Gases created through human industrial and agricultural practices (primarily carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels and wood, as well as methane, nitrous oxide, and chlorofluorocarbons) increase the heat-reflecting potential of the atmosphere, thereby raising the planet's average temperature.

Early Scientific Work

Since the late nineteenth century, atmospheric scientists in the United States and overseas have known that significant changes in the chemical composition of atmospheric gases might cause climate change on a global scale. In 1824, the French scientist Jean-Baptiste Fourier described how the earth's atmosphere functioned like the glass of a greenhouse, trapping heat and maintaining the stable climate that sustained life. By the 1890s, some scientists, including the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius and the American geologist Thomas Chamberlain, had discerned that carbon dioxide had played a central role historically in regulating global temperatures.

In 1896, Arrhenius provided the first quantitative analysis of how changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide could alter surface temperatures and ultimately lead to climatic change on a scale comparable with the ice ages. In 1899, Chamberlain similarly linked glacial periods to changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide and posited that water vapor might provide crucial positive feedback to changes in carbon dioxide. In the first decade of the twentieth century, Arrhenius further noted that industrial combustion of coal and other fossil fuels could introduce enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to change the temperature of the planet over the course of a few centuries. However, he predicted that warming would be delayed because the oceans would absorb most of the carbon dioxide. Arrhenius further posited various societal benefits from this planetary warming.

Developing Scientific Consensus

Over the course of the twentieth century, scientists con-firmed these early predictions as they probed further into the functioning of the earth's atmospheric system. Early in the century, dozens of scientists around the world contributed to an internationally burgeoning understanding of atmospheric science. By the century's close, thousands of scientists collaborated to refine global models of climate change and regional analyses of how rising temperatures might alter weather patterns, ecosystem dynamics, agriculture, oceans and ice cover, and human health and disease.

While no one scientific breakthrough revolutionized climate change science or popular understanding of the phenomenon, several key events stand out to chart developing scientific understanding of global warming. In 1938, Guy S. Callendar provided an early calculation of warming due to human-introduced carbon dioxide and contended that this warming was evident already in the temperature record. Obscured by the onset of World War II and by a short-term cooling trend that began in the 1940s, Callendar's analysis received short shrift. Interest in global warming increased in the 1950s with new techniques for studying climate, including analysis of ancient pollens, ocean shells, and new computer models. Using computer models, in 1956, Gilbert N. Plass attracted greater attention to the carbon dioxide theory of climate change. The following year, Roger Revelle and Hans Suess showed that oceanic absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide would not be sufficient to delay global warming. They stressed the magnitude of the phenomenon:

Human beings are now carrying out a large scale geophysical experiment of a kind that could not have happened in the past nor be reproduced in the future. Within a few centuries we are returning to the atmosphere and oceans the concentrated organic carbon stored in sedimentary rocks over hundreds of millions of years. (Cristianson, Greenhouse, pp. 155–156)

At the same time, Charles Keeling began to measure the precise year-by-year rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide from the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. In 1965, the President's Scientific Advisory Committee issued the first U.S. government report that summarized recent climate research and outlined potential future changes resulting from increased atmospheric carbon dioxide, including the melting of the Antarctic ice cap, the rise of sea level, and the warming of oceans.

By the late 1970s, atmospheric scientists had grown increasingly confident that the buildup of carbon dioxide, methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and related gases in the atmosphere would have a significant, lasting impact on global climate. Several jointly written government reports issued during President Jimmy Carter's administration presented early consensus estimates of global climate change. These estimates would prove consistent with more sophisticated models refined in the two decades following. A 1979 National Research Council report by Jule G. Charney, Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment, declared that "we now have incontrovertible evidence that the atmosphere is indeed changing and that we ourselves contribute to that change. Atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are steadily increasing, and these changes are linked with man's use of fossil fuels and exploitation of the land" (p. vii). The Charney report estimated a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations would probably result in a roughly 3-degree Celsius rise in temperature, plus or minus 1.5 degrees.

Global Warming Politics

As climate science grew more conclusive, global warming became an increasingly challenging political problem. In January 1981, in the closing days of the Carter administration, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published Global Energy Futures and the Carbon Dioxide Problem. The CEQ report described climate change as the "ultimate environmental dilemma," which required collective judgments to be made, either by decision or default, "largely on the basis of scientific models that have severe limitations and that few can understand." The report reviewed available climate models and predicted that carbon dioxide–related global warming "should be observable now or sometime within the next two decades"

(p. v). With atmospheric carbon dioxide increasing rapidly, the CEQ report noted that the world was already "performing a great planetary experiment" (p. 52).

By the early 1980s, the scientific models of global warming had established the basic contours of this atmospheric phenomenon. Federal environmental agencies and scientific advisory boards had urged action to curb carbon dioxide emissions dramatically, yet little state, federal, or international policymaking ensued. Decades-old federal and state subsidies for fossil fuel production and consumption remained firmly in place. The federal government lessened its active public support for energy efficiency initiatives and alternative energy development. Falling oil and natural gas prices throughout the decade further undermined political support for a national energy policy that would address the problem of global warming.

A complicated intersection of climate science and policy further hindered effective lawmaking. Scientists urged political action, but spoke in a measured language that emphasized probability and uncertainty. Many scientists resisted entering the political arena, and expressed skepticism about their colleagues who did. This skepticism came to a head in reaction to the government scientist James Hansen's efforts to focus national attention on global warming during the drought-filled summer of 1988. As more than 400,000 acres of Yellowstone National Park burned in a raging fire, Hansen testified to Congress that he was 99 percent certain that the earth was getting warmer because of the greenhouse effect. While the testimony brought significant new political attention in the United States to the global warming problem, many of Hansen's scientific colleagues were dismayed by his definitive assertions. Meanwhile, a small number of skeptical scientists who emphasized the un-certainty of global warming and the need to delay policy initiatives fueled opposition to political action.

In 1988, delegates from nearly fifty nations met in Toronto and Geneva to address the climate change problem. The delegates formed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), consisting of more than two thousand scientists from around the world, to assess systematically global warming science and policy options. The IPCC issued its first report in 1990, followed by second and third assessments in 1995 and 2001. Each IPCC report provided increasingly precise predictions of future warming and the regional impacts of climate change. Meanwhile, books like Bill McKibben's The End of Nature (1989) and Senator Albert Gore Jr.'s Earth in the Balance (1992) focused popular attention in the United States on global warming.

Yet these developments did not prompt U.S. government action. With its major industries highly dependent on fossil fuel consumption, the United States instead helped block steps to combat climate change at several international conferences in the late 1980s and 1990s. At the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, U.S. negotiators successfully thwarted a treaty with mandatory limits on greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, the Rio conference adopted only voluntary limits. In 1993, the new administration of Bill Clinton and Albert Gore Jr. committed itself to returning United States emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000. The administration also attempted to adjust incentives for energy consumption in its 1993 energy tax bill. Defeated on the tax bill and cowed when Republicans gained control of Congress in 1994, however, the Clinton administration backed away from significant new energy and climate initiatives.

At the highly charged 1997 United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Kyoto, Japan, more than 160 countries approved a protocol that would reduce emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and three chlorofluorocarbon substitutes. In the United States, powerful industry opponents to the Kyoto Protocol, represented by the Global Climate Coalition (an industry association including Exxon, Mobil, Shell Oil, Ford, and General Motors, as well as other automobile, mining, steel, and chemical companies), denounced the protocol's "unrealistic targets and timetables" and argued instead for voluntary action and further research. Along with other opponents, the coalition spent millions of dollars on television ads criticizing the agreement, focusing on possible emissions exemptions for developing nations. Although the Clinton administration signed the Kyoto Protocol, strong Senate opposition to the agreement prevented ratification. In 2001, President George W. Bush withdrew his executive support for the protocol.

Growing Signals of Global Warming

By the end of the 1990s, climate science had grown increasingly precise and achieved virtual worldwide scientific consensus on climate change. The 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded that global average surface temperature had increased by 0.6 degrees Celsius during the twentieth century, largely due to greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere had increased by approximately 30 percent since the late nineteenth century, rising from 280 parts per million (ppm) by volume to 367 ppm in 1998.

By 2001, signs of global warming were increasingly widespread. With glaciers around the world melting, average sea levels rising, and average precipitation increasing, the 1990s registered as the hottest decade on record in the past thousand years. Regional models predicted widespread shifting of ecosystems in the United States, with alpine ecosystems expected largely to disappear in the lower forty-eight states while savannas or grasslands replace desert ecosystems in the Southwest. The IPCC 2001 report estimated an increase of between 1.4 and 5.8 degrees Celsius by 2100, a projected increase in global temperature very likely "without precedent during at least the last 10,000 years."

Bibliography

Christianson, Gale E. Greenhouse: The 200-Year Story of Global Warming. New York: Walker, 1999.

Council on Environmental Quality. Global Energy Futures and the Carbon Dioxide Problem. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1981.

Handel, Mark David, and James S. Risbey. An Annotated Bibliography on Greenhouse Effect Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Global Change Science, 1992.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptations, and Vulnerability. Edited by James J. McCarthy et al. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

———. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Edited by Bert Metz et al. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

———. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Edited by J. T. Houghton et al. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

McKibben, Bill. The End of Nature. 10th anniv. ed. New York: Anchor, 1999.

National Research Council. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1979.

—Paul Sabin

 
Columbia Encyclopedia: global warming
Top
Home > Library > Miscellaneous > Columbia Encyclopedia
global warming, the gradual increase of the temperature of the earth's lower atmosphere as a result of the increase in greenhouse gases since the Industrial Revolution.

The temperature of the atmosphere near the earth's surface is warmed through a natural process called the greenhouse effect. Visible, shortwave light comes from the sun to the earth, passing unimpeded through a blanket of thermal, or greenhouse, gases composed largely of water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone. Infrared radiation reflects off the planet's surface toward space but does not easily pass through the thermal blanket. Some of it is trapped and reflected downward, keeping the planet at an average temperature suitable to life, about 60°F (16°C).

Growth in industry, agriculture, and transportation since the Industrial Revolution has produced additional quantities of the natural greenhouse gases plus chlorofluorocarbons and other gases, augmenting the thermal blanket. It is generally accepted that this increase in the quantity of greenhouse gases is trapping more heat and increasing global temperatures, making a process that has been beneficial to life potentially disruptive and harmful. During the 20th cent., the atmospheric temperature rose 1.1°F (0.6°C), and sea level rose several inches. Some projected, longer-term results of global warming include melting of polar ice, with a resulting rise in sea level and coastal flooding; disruption of drinking water supplies dependent on snow melts; profound changes in agriculture due to climate change; extinction of species as ecological niches disappear; more frequent tropical storms; and an increased incidence of tropical diseases.

Among factors that may be contributing to global warming are the burning of coal and petroleum products (sources of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone); deforestation, which increases the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; methane gas released in animal waste; and increased cattle production, which contributes to deforestation, methane production, and use of fossil fuels.

Much of the debate surrounding global warming has centered on the accuracy of scientific predictions concerning future warming. To predict global climatic trends, climatologists accumulate large historical databases and use them to create computerized models that simulate the earth's climate. The validity of these models has been a subject of controversy. Skeptics say that the climate is too complicated to be accurately modeled, and that there are too many unknowns. Some also question whether the observed climate changes might simply represent normal fluctuations in global temperature. Nonetheless, for some time there has been general agreement that at least part of the observed warming is the result of human activity, and that the problem needs to be addressed. In 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, over 150 nations signed a binding declaration on the need to reduce global warming.

In 1994, however, a UN scientific advisory panel, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, concluded that reductions beyond those envisioned by the treaty would be needed to avoid global warming. The following year, the advisory panel forecast a rise in global temperature of from 1.44 to 6.3°F (0.8-3.5°C) by 2100 if no action is taken to cut down on the production of greenhouse gases, and a rise of from 1 to 3.6°F (0.5-2°C) even if action is taken (because of already released gases that will persist in the atmosphere). A 2007 report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, based on a three-year study, termed global warming "unequivocal" and said that most of the change was most likely due to human activities.

A UN Conference on Climate Change, held in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997 resulted in an international agreement to fight global warming, which called for reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases by industrialized nations. Not all industrial countries, however, immediately signed or ratified the accord. In 2001 the G. W. Bush administration announced it would abandon the Kyoto Protocol; because the United States produces about one quarter of the world's greenhouse gases, this was regarded as a severe blow to the effort to slow global warming. Despite the American move, most other nations agreed later in the year (in Bonn, Germany, and in Marrakech, Morocco) on the details necessary to convert the agreement into a binding international treaty, which came into force in 2005 after ratification by more than 125 nations.

Improved automobile mileage, reforestation projects, energy efficiency in construction, and national support for mass transit are among relatively simpler adjustments that could significantly lower U.S. production of greenhouse gases. More aggressive adjustments include a gradual worldwide shift away from the use of fossil fuels, the elimination of chlorofluorocarbons, and the slowing of deforestation by restructuring the economies of developing nations. In 2002 the Bush administration proposed several voluntary measures for slowing the increase in, instead of reducing, emissions of greenhouses gases. The United States, Australia, China, India, Japan, and South Korea established (2005) an agreement outside the Kyoto Protocal that proposed to reduce emissions through the development and implementation of new technologies. The Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate, as it is called, involves no commitments on the part of its members; it held its first meeting in 2006. Also in 2006, California enacted legislation that called for cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 25% by 2020; the state is responsible for nearly 7% of all such emissions in the United States. In 2007 President George W. Bush called for the world's major polluting nations to set global and national goals for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but the nonbinding nature of the proposed goals provoked skepticism from nations that favored stronger measures.

Bibliography

See P. Brown, Global Warming: Can Civilization Survive? (1997); T. G. Moore, Climate of Fear: Why We Shouldn't Worry about Global Warming (1998); S. G. Philander, Is the Temperature Rising?: The Uncertain Science of Global Warming (1998); K. E. Ready, GAIA Weeps: The Crisis of Global Warming (1998); G. E. Christianson, Greenhouse: The 200-Year Story of Global Warming (1999); T. Flannery, The Weather Makers: How Man Is Changing the Climate and What It Means for Life on Earth (2006); E. Kolbert, Field Notes from a Catastrophe (2006); E. Linden, The Winds of Change (2006).

Science Dictionary: global warming
Top
Home > Library > Science > Science Dictionary

The term attached to the notion that the Earth's temperature is increasing due to the greenhouse effect.

  • Whether global warming is actually happening is a subject of scientific debate.

    • Wikipedia: Global warming
    Top
    Home > Library > Miscellaneous > Wikipedia
    For past climate change, see paleoclimatology and geologic temperature record.
    Comparison of ground based (blue) and satellite based (red: UAH; green: RSS) records of temperature variations since 1979. Trends plotted since January 1982.
    Global mean surface temperature difference from the average for 1961–1990
    Mean surface temperature change for the period 1999 to 2008 relative to the average temperatures from 1940 to 1980

    Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of the Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation. Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the last century.[1][A] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation.[1] The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanoes produced most of the warming from pre-industrial times to 1950 and had a small cooling effect afterward.[2][3] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.[4]

    Climate model projections summarized in the latest IPCC report indicate that the global surface temperature will probably rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the twenty-first century.[1] The uncertainty in this estimate arises from the use of models with differing sensitivity to greenhouse gas concentrations and the use of differing estimates of future greenhouse gas emissions. Some other uncertainties include how warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe. Most studies focus on the period up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[5][6]

    An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts.[7] The continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice is expected, with warming being strongest in the Arctic. Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields.

    Political and public debate continues regarding climate change, and what actions (if any) to take in response. The available options are mitigation to reduce further emissions; adaptation to reduce the damage caused by warming; and, more speculatively, geoengineering to reverse global warming. Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    Contents

    Temperature changes

    Main article: Temperature record
    Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions, each smoothed on a decadal scale. The unsmoothed, annual value for 2004 is also plotted for reference.

    The most commonly discussed measure of global warming is the trend in globally averaged temperature near the Earth's surface. Expressed as a linear trend, this temperature rose by 0.74°C ±0.18°C over the period 1906-2005. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13°C ±0.03°C per decade, versus 0.07°C ± 0.02°C per decade). The urban heat island effect is estimated to account for about 0.002 °C of warming per decade since 1900.[8] Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.12 and 0.22 °C (0.22 and 0.4 °F) per decade since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Temperature is believed to have been relatively stable over the one or two thousand years before 1850, with regionally-varying fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age.

    Based on estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2005 was the warmest year since reliable, widespread instrumental measurements became available in the late 1800s, exceeding the previous record set in 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree.[9] Estimates prepared by the World Meteorological Organization and the Climatic Research Unit concluded that 2005 was the second warmest year, behind 1998.[10][11] Temperatures in 1998 were unusually warm because the strongest El Niño in the past century occurred during that year.[12] Global temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations that overlay long term trends and can temporarily mask them. The relative stability in temperature from 1999 to 2009 is consistent with such an episode.[13] [14]

    Temperature changes vary over the globe. Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C per decade against 0.13 °C per decade).[15] Ocean temperatures increase more slowly than land temperatures because of the larger effective heat capacity of the oceans and because the ocean loses more heat by evaporation.[16] The Northern Hemisphere warms faster than the Southern Hemisphere because it has more land and because it has extensive areas of seasonal snow and sea-ice cover subject to the ice-albedo feedback. Although more greenhouse gases are emitted in the Northern than Southern Hemisphere this does not contribute to the difference in warming because the major greenhouse gases persist long enough to mix between hemispheres.[17]

    The thermal inertia of the oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects mean that climate can take centuries or longer to adjust to changes in forcing. Climate commitment studies indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[18]

    Radiative forcing

    Main article: Radiative forcing

    External forcing is a term used in climate science for processes external to the climate system (though not necessarily external to Earth). Climate responds to several types of external forcing, such as changes in greenhouse gas concentrations, changes in solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in Earth's orbit around the Sun.[2] Attribution of recent climate change focuses on the first three types of forcing. Orbital cycles vary slowly over tens of thousands of years and thus are too gradual to have caused the temperature changes observed in the past century.

    Greenhouse gases

    Main articles: Greenhouse gas and Greenhouse effect
    Greenhouse effect schematic showing energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and earth's surface. Energy exchanges are expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2).
     
    Recent atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) increases. Monthly CO2 measurements display seasonal oscillations in overall yearly uptrend; each year's maximum occurs during the Northern Hemisphere's late spring, and declines during its growing season as plants remove some atmospheric CO2.

    The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere warm a planet's lower atmosphere and surface. It was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896.[19] Existence of the greenhouse effect as such is not disputed, even by those who do not agree that the recent temperature increase is attributable to human activity. The question is instead how the strength of the greenhouse effect changes when human activity increases the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

    Naturally occurring greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).[20][C] The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70 percent of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26 percent; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9 percent[not in citation given]; and ozone (O3), which causes 3–7 percent.[21][22] Clouds also affect the radiation balance, but they are composed of liquid water or ice and so are considered separately from water vapor and other gases.

    Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO2, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs and nitrous oxide. The concentrations of CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively since the mid-1700s.[23] These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores.[24] Less direct geological evidence indicates that CO2 values this high were last seen about 20 million years ago.[25] Fossil fuel burning has produced about three-quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over the past 20 years. Most of the rest is due to land-use change, particularly deforestation.[26]

    CO2 concentrations are continuing to rise due to burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. The future rate of rise will depend on uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural developments. Accordingly, the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future CO2 scenarios, ranging from 541 to 970 ppm by the year 2100.[27] Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach these levels and continue emissions past 2100 if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively exploited.[28]

    The destruction of stratospheric ozone by chlorofluorocarbons is sometimes mentioned in relation to global warming. Although there are a few areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is not strong. Reduction of stratospheric ozone has a cooling influence, but substantial ozone depletion did not occur until the late 1970s.[29] Tropospheric ozone contributes to surface warming.[30]

    Aerosols and soot

    Ship tracks over the Atlantic Ocean on the east coast of the United States. The climatic impacts from aerosol forcing could have a large effect on climate through the indirect effect.

    Global dimming, a gradual reduction in the amount of global direct irradiance at the Earth's surface, has partially counteracted global warming from 1960 to the present.[31] The main cause of this dimming is aerosols produced by volcanoes and pollutants. These aerosols exert a cooling effect by increasing the reflection of incoming sunlight. James Hansen and colleagues have proposed that the effects of the products of fossil fuel combustion—CO2 and aerosols—have largely offset one another in recent decades, so that net warming has been driven mainly by non-CO2 greenhouse gases.[32]

    In addition to their direct effect by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, aerosols have indirect effects on the radiation budget.[33] Sulfate aerosols act as cloud condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer and larger droplets.[34] This effect also causes droplets to be of more uniform size, which reduces growth of raindrops and makes the cloud more reflective to incoming sunlight.[35]

    Soot may cool or warm, depending on whether it is airborne or deposited. Atmospheric soot aerosols directly absorb solar radiation, which heats the atmosphere and cools the surface. Regionally (but not globally), as much as 50% of surface warming due to greenhouse gases may be masked by atmospheric brown clouds.[36] When deposited, especially on glaciers or on ice in arctic regions, the lower surface albedo can also directly heat the surface.[37] The influences of aerosols, including black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly in Asia, while the effects of greenhouse gases are dominant in the extratropics and southern hemisphere.[38]

    Solar variation

    Main article: Solar variation
    Solar variation over the last thirty years.

    Variations in solar output have been the cause of past climate changes.[39] Although solar forcing is generally thought to be too small to account for a significant part of global warming in recent decades,[40][41] a few studies disagree, such as a recent phenomenological analysis that indicates the contribution of solar forcing may be underestimated.[42]

    Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere.[2] Observations show that temperatures in the stratosphere have been steady or cooling since 1979, when satellite measurements became available. Radiosonde (weather balloon) data from the pre-satellite era show cooling since 1958, though there is greater uncertainty in the early radiosonde record.[43]

    A related hypothesis, proposed by Henrik Svensmark, is that magnetic activity of the sun deflects cosmic rays that may influence the generation of cloud condensation nuclei and thereby affect the climate.[44] Other research has found no relation between warming in recent decades and cosmic rays.[45][46] A recent study concluded that the influence of cosmic rays on cloud cover is about a factor of 100 lower than needed to explain the observed changes in clouds or to be a significant contributor to present-day climate change.[47]

    Feedback

    Main article: Effects of global warming

    A positive feedback is a process that amplifies some change. Thus, when a warming trend results in effects that induce further warming, the result is a positive feedback; when the warming results in effects that reduce the original warming, the result is a negative feedback. The main positive feedback in global warming involves the tendency of warming to increase the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. The main negative feedback in global warming is the effect of temperature on emission of infrared radiation: as the temperature of a body increases, the emitted radiation increases with the fourth power of its absolute temperature.

    Water vapor feedback 
    If the atmosphere is warmed, the saturation vapor pressure increases, and the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere will tend to increase. Since water vapor is a greenhouse gas, the increase in water vapor content makes the atmosphere warm further; this warming causes the atmosphere to hold still more water vapor (a positive feedback), and so on until other processes stop the feedback loop. The result is a much larger greenhouse effect than that due to CO2 alone. Although this feedback process causes an increase in the absolute moisture content of the air, the relative humidity stays nearly constant or even decreases slightly because the air is warmer.[48]
    Cloud feedback 
    Warming is expected to change the distribution and type of clouds. Seen from below, clouds emit infrared radiation back to the surface, and so exert a warming effect; seen from above, clouds reflect sunlight and emit infrared radiation to space, and so exert a cooling effect. Whether the net effect is warming or cooling depends on details such as the type and altitude of the cloud. These details were poorly observed before the advent of satellite data and are difficult to represent in climate models.[48]
    Lapse rate 
    The atmosphere's temperature decreases with height in the troposphere. Since emission of infrared radiation varies with temperature, longwave radiation escaping to space from the relatively cold upper atmosphere is less than that emitted toward the ground from the lower atmosphere. Thus, the strength of the greenhouse effect depends on the atmosphere's rate of temperature decrease with height. Both theory and climate models indicate that global warming will reduce the rate of temperature decrease with height, producing a negative lapse rate feedback that weakens the greenhouse effect. Measurements of the rate of temperature change with height are very sensitive to small errors in observations, making it difficult to establish whether the models agree with observations.[49]
    Ice-albedo feedback 
    Aerial photograph showing a section of sea ice. The lighter blue areas are melt ponds and the darkest areas are open water, both have a lower albedo than the white sea ice. The melting ice contributes to the ice-albedo feedback.
    When ice melts, land or open water takes its place. Both land and open water are on average less reflective than ice and thus absorb more solar radiation. This causes more warming, which in turn causes more melting, and this cycle continues.[50]
    Arctic methane release 
    Warming is also the triggering variable for the release of methane in the arctic.[51] Methane released from thawing permafrost such as the frozen peat bogs in Siberia, and from methane clathrate on the sea floor, creates a positive feedback.[52]
    Reduced absorption of CO2 by the oceanic ecosystems 
    Ocean ecosystems' ability to sequester carbon is expected to decline as the oceans warm. This is because warming reduces the nutrient levels of the mesopelagic zone (about 200 to 1000 m deep), which limits the growth of diatoms in favor of smaller phytoplankton that are poorer biological pumps of carbon.[53]
    CO2 release from oceans 
    Cooler water can absorb more CO2. As ocean temperatures rise some of this CO2 will be released. This is one of the main reasons why atmospheric CO2 is lower during an ice age. There is a greater mass of CO2 contained in the oceans than there is in the atmosphere.
    Gas release 
    Release of gases of biological origin may be affected by global warming, but research into such effects is at an early stage. Some of these gases, such as nitrous oxide released from peat, directly affect climate.[54] Others, such as dimethyl sulfide released from oceans, have indirect effects.[55]

    Climate models

    Main article: Global climate model
    Calculations of global warming prepared in or before 2001 from a range of climate models under the SRES A2 emissions scenario, which assumes no action is taken to reduce emissions and regionally divided economic development.
     
    The geographic distribution of surface warming during the 21st century calculated by the HadCM3 climate model if a business as usual scenario is assumed for economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions. In this figure, the globally averaged warming corresponds to 3.0 °C (5.4 °F).

    The main tools for projecting future climate changes are mathematical models based on physical principles including fluid dynamics, thermodynamics and radiative transfer. Although they attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system. All modern climate models are in fact combinations of models for different parts of the Earth. These include an atmospheric model for air movement, temperature, clouds, and other atmospheric properties; an ocean model that predicts temperature, salt content, and circulation of ocean waters; models for ice cover on land and sea; and a model of heat and moisture transfer from soil and vegetation to the atmosphere. Some models also include treatments of chemical and biological processes.[56] Warming due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases is not an assumption of the models; rather, it is an end result from the interaction of greenhouse gases with radiative transfer and other physical processes in the models.[57] Although much of the variation in model outcomes depends on the greenhouse gas emissions used as inputs, the temperature effect of a specific greenhouse gas concentration (climate sensitivity) varies depending on the model used. The representation of clouds is one of the main sources of uncertainty in present-generation models.[58]

    Global climate model projections of future climate most often have used estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). In addition to human-caused emissions, some models also include a simulation of the carbon cycle; this generally shows a positive feedback, though this response is uncertain. Some observational studies also show a positive feedback.[59][60][61] Including uncertainties in future greenhouse gas concentrations and climate sensitivity, the IPCC anticipates a warming of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C (2.0 °F to 11.5 °F) by the end of the 21st century, relative to 1980–1999.[1]

    Models are also used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to those that the models project from various natural and human-derived causes. Although these models do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either natural variation or human effects, they do indicate that the warming since 1970 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.[62]

    The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate current or past climates.[63] Current climate models produce a good match to observations of global temperature changes over the last century, but do not simulate all aspects of climate.[26] While a 2007 study by David Douglass and colleagues found that the models did not accurately predict observed changes in the tropical troposphere,[64] a 2008 paper published by a 17-member team led by Ben Santer noted errors and incorrect assumptions in the Douglass study, and found instead that the models and observations were not statistically different.[65] Not all effects of global warming are accurately predicted by the climate models used by the IPCC. For example, observed Arctic shrinkage has been faster than that predicted.[66]

    Attributed and expected effects

    Environmental

    Main articles: Effects of global warming and Regional effects of global warming
    Sparse records indicate that glaciers have been retreating since the early 1800s. In the 1950s measurements began that allow the monitoring of glacial mass balance, reported to the WGMS and the NSIDC.

    It usually is impossible to connect specific weather events to global warming. Instead, global warming is expected to cause changes in the overall distribution and intensity of events, such as changes to the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation. Broader effects are expected to include glacial retreat, Arctic shrinkage, and worldwide sea level rise. Some effects on both the natural environment and human life are, at least in part, already being attributed to global warming. A 2001 report by the IPCC suggests that glacier retreat, ice shelf disruption such as that of the Larsen Ice Shelf, sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, and increased intensity and frequency of extreme weather events are attributable in part to global warming.[67] Other expected effects include water scarcity in some regions and increased precipitation in others, changes in mountain snowpack, and some adverse health effects from warmer temperatures.[68]

    Social and economic effects of global warming may be exacerbated by growing population densities in affected areas. Temperate regions are projected to experience some benefits, such as fewer cold-related deaths.[69] A summary of probable effects and recent understanding can be found in the report made for the IPCC Third Assessment Report by Working Group II.[67] The newer IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summary reports that there is observational evidence for an increase in intense tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic Ocean since about 1970, in correlation with the increase in sea surface temperature (see Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), but that the detection of long-term trends is complicated by the quality of records prior to routine satellite observations. The summary also states that there is no clear trend in the annual worldwide number of tropical cyclones.[1]

    Additional anticipated effects include sea level rise of 0.18 to 0.59 meters (0.59 to 1.9 ft) in 2090-2100 relative to 1980-1999,[1] new trade routes resulting from arctic shrinkage,[70] possible thermohaline circulation slowing, increasingly intense (but less frequent) hurricanes and extreme weather events,[71] reductions in the ozone layer, changes in agriculture yields, changes in the range of climate-dependent disease vectors,[72] which has been linked to increases in the prevalence of malaria and dengue fever,[73] and ocean oxygen depletion.[74] Increased atmospheric CO2 increases the amount of CO2 dissolved in the oceans.[75] CO2 dissolved in the ocean reacts with water to form carbonic acid, resulting in ocean acidification. Ocean surface pH is estimated to have decreased from 8.25 near the beginning of the industrial era to 8.14 by 2004,[76] and is projected to decrease by a further 0.14 to 0.5 units by 2100 as the ocean absorbs more CO2.[1][77] Heat and carbon dioxide trapped in the oceans may still take hundreds years to be re-emitted, even after greenhouse gas emissions are eventually reduced.[6] Since organisms and ecosystems are adapted to a narrow range of pH, this raises extinction concerns and disruptions in food webs.[78] One study predicts 18% to 35% of a sample of 1,103 animal and plant species would be extinct by 2050, based on future climate projections.[79] However, few mechanistic studies have documented extinctions due to recent climate change,[80] and one study suggests that projected rates of extinction are uncertain.[81]

    Economic

    Main articles: Economics of global warming and Low-carbon economy
    Projected temperature increase for a range of stabilization scenarios (the colored bands). The black line in middle of the shaded area indicates 'best estimates'; the red and the blue lines the likely limits. From IPCC AR4.

    The IPCC reports the aggregate net economic costs of damages from climate change globally (discounted to the specified year). In 2005, the average social cost of carbon from 100 peer-reviewed estimates is US$12 per tonne of CO2, but range -$3 to $95/tCO2. The IPCC's gives these cost estimates with the caveats, "Aggregate estimates of costs mask significant differences in impacts across sectors, regions and populations and very likely underestimate damage costs because they cannot include many non-quantifiable impacts."[82]

    One widely publicized report on potential economic impact is the Stern Review, written by Sir Nicholas Stern. It suggests that extreme weather might reduce global gross domestic product by up to one percent, and that in a worst-case scenario global per capita consumption could fall by the equivalent of 20 percent.[83] The response to the Stern Review was mixed. The Review's methodology, advocacy and conclusions were criticized by several economists, including Richard Tol, Gary Yohe,[84] Robert Mendelsohn[85] and William Nordhaus.[86] Economists that have generally supported the Review include Terry Barker,[87] William Cline,[88] and Frank Ackerman.[89] According to Barker, the costs of mitigating climate change are 'insignificant' relative to the risks of unmitigated climate change.[90]

    According to United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), economic sectors likely to face difficulties related to climate change include banks, agriculture, transport and others.[91] Developing countries dependent upon agriculture will be particularly harmed by global warming.[92]

    Responses to global warming

    The broad agreement among climate scientists that global temperatures will continue to increase has led some nations, states, corporations and individuals to implement responses. These responses to global warming can be divided into mitigation of the causes and effects of global warming, adaptation to the changing global environment, and geoengineering to reverse global warming.

    Mitigation

    Main article: Mitigation of global warming
    Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an approach to mitigation. Emissions may be sequestered from fossil fuel power plants, or removed during processing in hydrogen production. When used on plants, it is known as bio-energy with carbon capture and storage.

    Mitigation of global warming is accomplished through reductions in the rate of anthropogenic greenhouse gas release. Models suggest that mitigation can quickly begin to slow global warming, but that temperatures will appreciably decrease only after several centuries.[93] The world's primary international agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions is the Kyoto Protocol, an amendment to the UNFCCC negotiated in 1997. The Protocol now covers more than 160 countries and over 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.[94] As of June 2009, only the United States, historically the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, has refused to ratify the treaty. The treaty expires in 2012. International talks began in May 2007 on a future treaty to succeed the current one.[95] UN negotiations are now gathering pace in advance of a meeting in Copenhagen in December 2009.[96]

    Many environmental groups encourage individual action against global warming, as well as community and regional actions. Others have suggested a quota on worldwide fossil fuel production, citing a direct link between fossil fuel production and CO2 emissions.[97][98]

    There has also been business action on climate change, including efforts to improve energy efficiency and limited moves towards use of alternative fuels. In January 2005 the European Union introduced its European Union Emission Trading Scheme, through which companies in conjunction with government agree to cap their emissions or to purchase credits from those below their allowances. Australia announced its Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in 2008. United States President Barack Obama has announced plans to introduce an economy-wide cap and trade scheme.[99]

    The IPCC's Working Group III is responsible for crafting reports on mitigation of global warming and the costs and benefits of different approaches. The 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report concludes that no one technology or sector can be completely responsible for mitigating future warming. They find there are key practices and technologies in various sectors, such as energy supply, transportation, industry, and agriculture, that should be implemented to reduced global emissions. They estimate that stabilization of carbon dioxide equivalent between 445 and 710 ppm by 2030 will result in between a 0.6 percent increase and three percent decrease in global gross domestic product.[100]

    Adaptation

    Main article: Adaptation to global warming

    A wide variety of measures have been suggested for adaptation to global warming. These measures range from the trivial, such as the installation of air-conditioning equipment, to major infrastructure projects, such as abandoning settlements threatened by sea level rise.

    Measures including water conservation,[101] water rationing, adaptive agricultural practices,[102] construction of flood defences,[103] Martian colonization,[104] changes to medical care,[105] and interventions to protect threatened species[106] have all been suggested. A wide-ranging study of the possible opportunities for adaptation of infrastructure has been published by the Institute of Mechanical Engineers.[107]

    Geoengineering

    Main article: Geoengineering

    Geoengineering is the deliberate modification of Earth's natural environment on a large scale to suit human needs.[108] An example is greenhouse gas remediation, which removes greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, usually through carbon sequestration techniques such as carbon dioxide air capture.[109] Solar radiation management reduces absorbed solar radiation, such as by the addition of stratospheric sulfur aerosols [110] or cool roof techniques.[111]. No large-scale geoengineering projects have yet been undertaken.

    Debate and skepticism

    Main articles: Global warming controversy and Politics of global warming
    See also: Scientific opinion on climate change and Climate change denial
    Per capita greenhouse gas emissions in 2000, including land-use change.
     
    Per country greenhouse gas emissions in 2000, including land-use change.

    Increased publicity of the scientific findings surrounding global warming has resulted in political and economic debate.[112] Poor regions, particularly Africa, appear at greatest risk from the projected effects of global warming, while their emissions have been small compared to the developed world.[113] The exemption of developing countries from Kyoto Protocol restrictions has been used to justify non-ratification by the U.S. and a previous Australian Government.[114] (Australia has since ratified the Kyoto protocol.[115]) Another point of contention is the degree to which emerging economies such as India and China should be expected to constrain their emissions.[116] The U.S. contends that if it must bear the cost of reducing emissions, then China should do the same[117][118] since China's gross national CO2 emissions now exceed those of the U.S.[119][120][121] China has contended that it is less obligated to reduce emissions since its per capita responsibility and per capita emissions are less that of the U.S.[122] India, also exempt, has made similar contentions.[123]

    In 2007-2008 the Gallup Polls surveyed 127 countries. Over a third of the world's population were unaware of global warming, developing countries less aware than developed, and Africa the least aware. Awareness does not equate to belief that global warming is a result of human activities. Of those aware, Latin America leads in belief that temperature changes are a result of human activities while Africa, parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet Union lead in the opposite.[124] In the western world, the concept and the appropriate responses are contested. Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University finds that "results show the different stages of engagement about global warming on each side of the Atlantic" where Europe debates the appropriate responses while the United States debates whether climate change is happening.[125]

    Debates weigh the benefits of limiting industrial emissions of greenhouse gases against the costs that such changes would entail.[100] Using economic incentives, alternative and renewable energy have been promoted to reduce emissions while building infrastructure.[126][127] Business-centered organizations such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute, conservative commentators, and companies such as ExxonMobil have downplayed IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls.[128][129][130][131] Environmental organizations and public figures have emphasized changes in the current climate and the risks they entail, while promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions reductions.[132] Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back their efforts in recent years,[133] or called for policies to reduce global warming.[134]

    Some global warming skeptics in the science or political community dispute all or some of the global warming scientific consensus, questioning whether global warming is actually occurring, whether human activity has contributed significantly to the warming, and on the magnitude of the threat posed by global warming. Prominent global warming skeptics include Richard Lindzen, Fred Singer, Patrick Michaels, John Christy, and Robert Balling.[135][136][137]

    See also

    Global Warming Map.jpg Global warming portal

    Notes

    1. ^ Increase is for years 1905 to 2005. Global surface temperature is defined in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report as the average of near-surface air temperature over land and sea surface temperature. These error bounds are constructed with a 90% uncertainty interval.
    2. ^ The 2001 joint statement was signed by the national academies of science of Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Caribbean, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK. The 2005 statement added Japan, Russia, and the U.S. The 2007 statement added Mexico and South Africa. The Network of African Science Academies, and the Polish Academy of Sciences have issued separate statements. Professional scientific societies include American Astronomical Society, American Chemical Society, American Geophysical Union, American Institute of Physics, American Meteorological Society, American Physical Society, American Quaternary Association, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, European Academy of Sciences and Arts, European Geosciences Union, European Science Foundation, Geological Society of America, Geological Society of Australia, Geological Society of London-Stratigraphy Commission, InterAcademy Council, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, International Union for Quaternary Research, National Association of Geoscience Teachers, National Research Council (US), Royal Meteorological Society, and World Meteorological Organization.
    3. ^ Note that the greenhouse effect produces an average worldwide temperature increase of about 33 °C (59 °F) compared to black body predictions without the greenhouse effect, not an average surface temperature of 33 °C (91 °F). The average worldwide surface temperature is about 14 °C (57 °F).

    References

    1. ^ a b c d e f g IPCC (2007-05-04). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf. Retrieved 2009-07-03. 
    2. ^ a b c Hegerl, Gabriele C.; et al. (2007). "Understanding and Attributing Climate Change" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_Ch09.pdf. "Recent estimates indicate a relatively small combined effect of natural forcings on the global mean temperature evolution of the second half of the 20th century, with a small net cooling from the combined effects of solar and volcanic forcings." 
    3. ^ Ammann, Caspar; et al. (2007). "Solar influence on climate during the past millennium: Results from transient simulations with the NCAR Climate Simulation Model" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (10): 3713–3718. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605064103. PMID 17360418. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/104/10/3713.pdf. "Simulations with only natural forcing components included yield an early 20th century peak warming of ≈0.2 °C (≈1950 AD), which is reduced to about half by the end of the century because of increased volcanism.". 
    4. ^ Royal Society (2005). "Joint science academies' statement: Global response to climate change". http://royalsociety.org/displaypagedoc.asp?id=20742. Retrieved 19 April 2009. 
    5. ^ Archer, David (2005). "Fate of fossil fuel CO2 in geologic time" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (C9): C09S05.1–C09S05.6. doi:10.1029/2004JC002625. http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~archer/reprints/archer.2005.fate_co2.pdf. 
    6. ^ a b Solomon, S; Plattner, GK; Knutti, R; Friedlingstein, P (2009). "Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (6): 1704–1709. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812721106. PMID 19179281. 
    7. ^ Lu, Jian; Vecchi, Gabriel A.; Reichler, Thomas (2007). "Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming". Geophysical Research Letters 34: L06805. doi:10.1029/2006GL028443. http://www.atmos.berkeley.edu/~jchiang/Class/Spr07/Geog257/Week10/Lu_Hadley06.pdf. 
    8. ^ Trenberth, Kevin E.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 3: Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change" (PDF). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. p. 244. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter3.pdf. 
    9. ^ Hansen, James E.; et al. (2006-01-12). "Goddard Institute for Space Studies, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis". NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/. Retrieved 2007-01-17. 
    10. ^ "Global Temperature for 2005: second warmest year on record" (PDF). Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia. 2005-12-15. http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/press/2005-12-WMO.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-13. 
    11. ^ "WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2005" (PDF). World Meteorological Organization. 2005-12-15. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/wcdmp/statement/documents/WMO998_E.pdf. Retrieved 2009-04-24. 
    12. ^ Changnon, Stanley A.; Bell, Gerald D. (2000). El Niño, 1997-1998: The Climate Event of the Century. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195135520. 
    13. ^ Knight, J.; Kenney, J.J.; Folland, C.; Harris, G.; Jones, G.S.; Palmer, M.; Parker, D.; Scaife, A. et al. (August 2009). "Do Global Temperature Trends Over the Last Decade Falsify Climate Predictions? [in "State of the Climate in 2008"]". Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc. 90 (8): S75-S79. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporate/pressoffice/2009/global_temperatures_09.pdf. Retrieved 2009-09-08. 
    14. ^ Global temperature slowdown — not an end to climate change, UK Met Office, http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/policymakers/policy/slowdown.html, retrieved 2009-09-08 
    15. ^ "IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Chapter 3". 2007-02-05. pp. 237. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter3.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-14. 
    16. ^ Rowan T. Sutton, Buwen Dong, Jonathan M. Gregory (2007). "Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations". Geophysical Research Letters 34: L02701. doi:10.1029/2006GL028164. http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006GL028164.shtml. Retrieved 2007-09-19. 
    17. ^ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). "Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/?src=/CLIMATE/IPCC_TAR/WG1/127.htm. 
    18. ^ Meehl, Gerald A.; et al. (2005-03-18). "How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise" (PDF). Science 307 (5716): 1769–1772. doi:10.1126/science.1106663. PMID 15774757. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/307/5716/1769.pdf. Retrieved 2007-02-11. 
    19. ^ Spencer Weart (2008). "The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect". The Discovery of Global Warming. American Institute of Physics. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    20. ^ IPCC (2007). "Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climate Change Science" (PDF). IPCC WG1 AR4 Report. IPCC. pp. p97 (PDF page 5 of 36). http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_Ch01.pdf. Retrieved 21 April 2009. "To emit 240 W m–2, a surface would have to have a temperature of around –19 °C. This is much colder than the conditions that actually exist at the Earth’s surface (the global mean surface temperature is about 14 °C). Instead, the necessary –19 °C is found at an altitude about 5 km above the surface." 
    21. ^ Kiehl, J.T. and K.E. Trenberth (1997). "Earth’s Annual Global Mean Energy Budget" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 78 (2): 197–208. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2. http://www.atmo.arizona.edu/students/courselinks/spring04/atmo451b/pdf/RadiationBudget.pdf. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    22. ^ Gavin Schmidt (6 Apr 2005). "Water vapour: feedback or forcing?". RealClimate. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    23. ^ EPA (2008). "Recent Climate Change: Atmosphere Changes". Climate Change Science Program. United States Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/recentac.html. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    24. ^ Neftel, A., E. Moor, H. Oeschger, and B. Stauffer (1985). "Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric CO2 in the past two centuries". Nature 315: 45–47. doi:10.1038/315045a0. 
    25. ^ Pearson, PN; Palmer, MR (2000). "Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years". Nature 406 (6797): 695–699. doi:10.1038/35021000. PMID 10963587. 
    26. ^ a b IPCC (2001). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/pdf/WG1_TAR-FRONT.pdf. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    27. ^ Prentice, I.C., et al. (2001). "The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: SRES scenarios and their implications for future CO2 concentration". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/123.htm. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    28. ^ Nakicenovic., N., et al. (2001). "An Overview of Scenarios: Resource Availability". IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission/104.htm. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    29. ^ Sparling, Brien (May 30, 2001). "Ozone Depletion, History and politics". NASA. http://www.nas.nasa.gov/About/Education/Ozone/history.html. Retrieved 2009-02-15. 
    30. ^ Shindell, Drew (2006). "Role of tropospheric ozone increases in 20th-century climate change". Journal of Geophysical Research 111: D08302. doi:10.1029/2005JD006348. 
    31. ^ Mitchell, J.F.B., et al. (2001). "Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes: Space-time studies". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/462.htm. Retrieved 21 April 2009. 
    32. ^ Hansen, J; Sato, M; Ruedy, R; Lacis, A; Oinas, V (2000). "Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (18): 9875–80. doi:10.1073/pnas.170278997. PMID 10944197. 
    33. ^ Lohmann, U. & J. Feichter (2005). "Global indirect aerosol effects: a review". Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5: 715–737. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/715/2005/acp-5-715-2005.html. 
    34. ^ Twomey, S. (1977). "Influence of pollution on shortwave albedo of clouds". J. Atmos. Sci. 34: 1149–1152. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2. 
    35. ^ Albrecht, B. (1989). "Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness". Science 245 (4923): 1227–1239. doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227. PMID 17747885. 
    36. ^ Ramanathan, V; Chung, C; Kim, D; Bettge, T; Buja, L; Kiehl, JT; Washington, WM; Fu, Q et al. (2005). "Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (15): 5326–5333. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500656102. PMID 15749818. http://www.pnas.org/content/102/15/5326.abstract. 
    37. ^ Ramanathan, V., et al. (2008). "Report Summary". Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Regional Assessment Report with Focus on Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.rrcap.unep.org/abc/impact/files/ABC_Report_Summary_Final.pdf. 
    38. ^ Ramanathan, V., et al. (2008). "Part III: Global and Future Implications". Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Regional Assessment Report with Focus on Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.rrcap.unep.org/abc/publication/Part%20III.pdf. 
    39. ^ National Research Council (1994). Solar Influences On Global Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. p. 36. ISBN 0-309-05148-7. http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=4778&page=R1. 
    40. ^ Hansen, J. (2002). "Climate". Journal of Geophysical Research 107: 4347. doi:10.1029/2001JD001143. 
    41. ^ Hansen, J. (2005). "Efficacy of climate forcings". Journal of Geophysical Research 110: D18104. doi:10.1029/2005JD005776. 
    42. ^ Scafetta, N. (2007). "Phenomenological reconstructions of the solar signature in the Northern Hemisphere surface temperature records since 1600". Journal of Geophysical Research 112: D24S03. doi:10.1029/2007JD008437. http://www.fel.duke.edu/~scafetta/pdf/2007JD008437.pdf. 
    43. ^ Randel, William J. (2009). "An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends". Journal of Geophysical Research 114: D02107. doi:10.1029/2008JD010421. 
    44. ^ Marsh, Nigel; Henrik, Svensmark (November 2000). "Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate" (PDF). Space Science Reviews 94 (1–2): 215–230. doi:10.1023/A:1026723423896. http://www.dsri.dk/~hsv/SSR_Paper.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-17. 
    45. ^ Lockwood, Mike; Claus Fröhlich (2007). "Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society A 463: 2447. doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1880. http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media/proceedings_a/rspa20071880.pdf. Retrieved 2007-07-21. "Our results show that the observed rapid rise in global mean temperatures seen after 1985 cannot be ascribed to solar variability, whichever of the mechanisms is invoked and no matter how much the solar variation is amplified.". 
    46. ^ T Sloan and A W Wolfendale (2008). "Testing the proposed causal link between cosmic rays and cloud cover". Environ. Res. Lett. 3: 024001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024001. http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-9326/3/2/024001/. 
    47. ^ Pierce, J.R. and P.J. Adams (2009). "Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates?". Geophysical Research Letters 36: L09820. doi:10.1029/2009GL037946. 
    48. ^ a b Soden, Brian J.; Held, Isacc M. (2005-11-01). "An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models" (PDF). Journal of Climate 19 (14): 3354–3360. doi:10.1175/JCLI3799.1. "Interestingly, the true feedback is consistently weaker than the constant relative humidity value, implying a small but robust reduction in relative humidity in all models on average" "clouds appear to provide a positive feedback in all models". 
    49. ^ National Research Council (2004). Understanding Climate Change Feedbacks. Panel on Climate Change Feedbacks, Climate Research Committee. National Academies Press. ISBN 0309090725. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10850. 
    50. ^ Stocker, Thomas F.; et al. (2001-01-20). "7.5.2 Sea Ice". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/295.htm. Retrieved 2007-02-11. 
    51. ^ Kvenvolden, K. A. (1988). "Methane Hydrates and Global Climate". Global Biogeochemical Cycles 2: 221. doi:10.1029/GB002i003p00221.  edit
    52. ^ Zimov, Sa; Schuur, Ea; Chapin, Fs (Jun 2006). "Climate change. Permafrost and the global carbon budget.". Science (New York, N.Y.) 312 (5780): 1612–3. doi:10.1126/science.1128908. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16778046. 
    53. ^ Buesseler, Ken O.; et al. (2007-04-27). "Revisiting Carbon Flux Through the Ocean's Twilight Zone" (abstract). Science 316 (5824): 567–570. doi:10.1126/science.1137959. PMID 17463282. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/316/5824/567. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 
    54. ^ Repo, M. E.; Susiluoto, S.; Lind, S. E.; Jokinen, S.; Elsakov, V.; Biasi, C.; Virtanen, T.; Martikainen, P. J. (2009). "Large N2O emissions from cryoturbated peat soil in tundra". Nature Geoscience 2: 189. doi:10.1038/ngeo434.  edit
    55. ^ Simó, R.; Dachs, J. (2002). "Global ocean emission of dimethylsulfide predicted from biogeophysical data". Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16: 1018. doi:10.1029/2001GB001829.  edit
    56. ^ Denman, K.L., et al. (2007). "Chapter 7, Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry" (PDF). Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter7.pdf. Retrieved 2008-02-21. 
    57. ^ Hansen, James (2000). "Climatic Change: Understanding Global Warming". One World: The Health & Survival of the Human Species in the 21st century. Health Press. http://books.google.com/books?id=sx6DFr8rbpIC&dq=robert+lanza&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=S7MXYzoDqR&sig=jfUo33FtVZ3PSUS2fcc_EtawEnQ. Retrieved 2007-08-18. 
    58. ^ Stocker, Thomas F.; et al. (2001). "7.2.2 Cloud Processes and Feedbacks". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/271.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-04. 
    59. ^ Torn, Margaret; Harte, John (2006). "Missing feedbacks, asymmetric uncertainties, and the underestimation of future warming". Geophysical Research Letters 33 (10): L10703. doi:10.1029/2005GL025540. L10703. http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2005GL025540.shtml. Retrieved 2007-03-04. 
    60. ^ Harte, John; et al. (2006). "Shifts in plant dominance control carbon-cycle responses to experimental warming and widespread drought". Environmental Research Letters 1 (1): 014001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/014001. 014001. http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1748-9326/1/1/014001/erl6_1_014001.html. Retrieved 2007-05-02. 
    61. ^ Scheffer, Marten; et al. (2006). "Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration inferred from past climate change." (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters 33: L10702. doi:10.1029/2005gl025044. http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~victor/recent/scheffer_etal_T_CO2_GRL_in_press.pdf. Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
    62. ^ http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter9.pdf
    63. ^ Randall, D.A., et al. (2007). "Chapter 8, Climate Models and Their Evaluation" (PDF). Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter8.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-21. 
    64. ^ Douglass, David H.; et al. (2007). "A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model predictions" (PDF). International Journal of Climatology 9999 (9999): 1693. doi:10.1002/joc.1651. http://icecap.us/images/uploads/DOUGLASPAPER.pdf. Retrieved 2008-05-12. 
    65. ^ Santer, B.D.; et al. (2008). "Consistency of modelled and observed temperature trends in the tropical troposphere" (PDF). International Journal of Climatology 28 (13): 1703. doi:10.1002/joc.1756. https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2008/NR-08-10-05-article.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-22. 
    66. ^ Stroeve, J., et al. (2007). "Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast". Geophysical Research Letters 34: L09501. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703. 
    67. ^ a b "Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". IPCC. 2001-02-16. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg2/index.htm. Retrieved 2007-03-14. 
    68. ^ McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S (2006). "Climate change and human health: present and future risks". Lancet 367 (9513): 859–69. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3. PMID 16530580. 
    69. ^ "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. IPCC. 2007-04-13. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4-wg2-spm.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-28. 
    70. ^ Macey, Jennifer (September 19, 2007). "Global warming opens up Northwest Passage". ABC News. http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/09/19/2037198.htm?section=business. Retrieved 2007-12-11. 
    71. ^ Knutson, Thomas R. (2008). "Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions". Nature Geoscience 1: 359. doi:10.1038/ngeo202. 
    72. ^ King, Gary M.; et al. (PDF). Global Environmental Change Microbial Contributions Microbial Solutions. American Society for Microbiology. pp. 7. http://www.asm.org/images/docfilename/0000006005/globalwarming%5B1%5D.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
    73. ^ Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P. et al., eds (2007). "Chapter 8: Human Health". Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521-88010-7. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg2/ar4-wg2-chapter8.pdf. 
    74. ^ Shaffer, G., S.M. Olsen and G.O.P Pederson (2009). "Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels". Nature Geoscience 2: 105–109. doi:10.1038/ngeo420. 
    75. ^ "Carbon Cycle". NASA. http://nasascience.nasa.gov/earth-science/oceanography/ocean-earth-system/ocean-carbon-cycle. Retrieved 2009-06-24. 
    76. ^ Jacobson, Mark Z. (2005-04-02). "Studying ocean acidification with conservative, stable numerical schemes for nonequilibrium air-ocean exchange and ocean equilibrium chemistry" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (D7): D07302. doi:10.1029/2004JD005220. D07302. http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/2004JD005220.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-28. 
    77. ^ Caldeira, Ken; Wickett, Michael E. (2005-09-21). "Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean". Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (C09S04): 1–12. doi:10.1029/2004JC002671. http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2005/2004JC002671.shtml. Retrieved 2006-02-14. 
    78. ^ Raven, John A.; et al. (2005-06-30) (ASP). Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Royal Society. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=13314. Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
    79. ^ Thomas, CD; Cameron, A; Green, RE; Bakkenes, M; Beaumont, LJ; Collingham, YC; Erasmus, BF; De Siqueira, MF et al. (2004-01-08). "Extinction risk from climate change" (PDF). Nature 427 (6970): 145–138. doi:10.1038/nature02121. PMID 14712274. http://www.geog.umd.edu/resac/outgoing/GEOG442%20Fall%202005/Lecture%20materials/extinctions%20and%20climate%20change.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-18. 
    80. ^ McLaughlin, John F.; et al. (2002-04-30). "Climate change hastens population extinctions" (PDF). PNAS 99 (9): 6070–6074. doi:10.1073/pnas.052131199. PMID 11972020. http://www.nd.edu/~hellmann/pnas.pdf. Retrieved 2007-03-29. 
    81. ^ Botkin, Daniel B.; et al. (March 2007). "Forecasting the Effects of Global Warming on Biodiversity" (PDF). BioScience 57 (3): 227–236. doi:10.1641/B570306. http://www.imv.dk/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2FFiles%2FFiler%2FIMV%2FPublikationer%2FFagartikler%2F2007%2F050307_Botkin_et_al.pdf. Retrieved 2007-11-30. 
    82. ^ Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.) (2007). "Summary for Policymakers". Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 22. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_frontmatter.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    83. ^ "At-a-glance: The Stern Review". BBC. 2006-10-30. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6098362.stm. Retrieved 2007-04-29. 
    84. ^ Tol, R. and G. Yohe (2006). "A Review of the Stern Review". World Economics 7 (4): 233–250. http://www.fnu.zmaw.de/fileadmin/fnu-files/publication/tol/RM551.pdf. 
    85. ^ Mendelsohn, R. (2006-2007). "A Critique of the Stern Report". Regulation. http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv29n4/v29n4-5.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    86. ^ Nordhaus, W. (2005). "The Economics of Climate Change, Part Two: Comments on the Stern Review. Chapter 5: William Nordhaus, Yale University, 'Opposite Ends of the Globe'". Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. http://www.ycsg.yale.edu/climate/. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    87. ^ Barker, T. (August 2008). "The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review". Climatic Change 89 (Volume 89, Numbers 3-4 / August, 2008): 173–194. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9433-x. http://www.springerlink.com/content/612k4k5v68r2577m/?p=20cde4d2d12e41939a4faac4082d8512&pi=0. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    88. ^ Cline, W. (January 5, 2008). "Comments on the Stern Review". Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=874. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    89. ^ Ackerman, F. (July 2007). "Debating Climate Economics: The Stern Review vs. Its Critics". Report to Friends of the Earth-UK. http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/rp/SternDebateReport.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-20. 
    90. ^ Terry Barker (April 14, 2008). "Full quote from IPCC on costs of climate change". FT.com. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/38c1bfa0-09bd-11dd-81bf-0000779fd2ac.html. Retrieved 2008-04-14. 
    91. ^ Dlugolecki, Andrew; et al. (2002). "Climate Risk to Global Economy" (PDF). CEO Briefing: UNEP FI Climate Change Working Group. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/CEO_briefing_climate_change_2002_en.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-29. 
    92. ^ "Thomas Schelling: Developing Countries Will Suffer Most from Global Warming" (PDF). Resources 164. http://www.rff.org/Publications/Resources/Documents/164/RFF-Resources-164_Thomas%20Schelling.pdf. Retrieved 2008-03-01. 
    93. ^ Lowe, J. A.; Huntingford, C.; Raper, S. C. B.; Jones, C. D.; Liddicoat, S. K.; Gohar, L. K. (2009). "How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming?". Environmental Research Letters 4: 014012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014012.  edit
    94. ^ "Kyoto Protocol Status of Ratification" (PDF). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2006-07-10. http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kpstats.pdf. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
    95. ^ "Twenty-sixth session and Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG), Third session". United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/meetings/sb26/items/3919.php. Retrieved 2009-06-21. 
    96. ^ Adam, David (14 April 2009). "World will not meet 2C warming target, climate change experts agree". Guardian News and Media Limited. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/apr/14/global-warming-target-2c. Retrieved 2009-04-14. "The poll comes as UN negotiations to agree a new global treaty to regulate carbon pollution gather pace in advance of a key meeting in Copenhagen in December. Officials will try to agree a successor to the Kyoto protocol, the first phase of which expires in 2012." 
    97. ^ "Climate Control: a proposal for controlling global greenhouse gas emissions" (PDF). Sustento Institute. http://sustento.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/climate-control.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-10. 
    98. ^ Monbiot, George. "Rigged - The climate talks are a stitch-up, as no one is talking about supply.". http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2007/12/11/rigged/. Retrieved 2007-12-22. 
    99. ^ "Barack Obama and Joe Biden: New Energy for America". http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy. Retrieved 2008-12-19. 
    100. ^ a b "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007-05-04. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg3/ar4-wg3-spm.pdf. Retrieved 2007-12-09. 
    101. ^ Boland, John J. (1997). "Assessing Urban Water Use and the Role of Water Conservation Measures under Climate Uncertainty". Climatic Change 37 (1): 157–176. doi:10.1023/A:1005324621274. 
    102. ^ Adams, R.M., et al. (1990). "Global climate change and US agriculture". Nature 345: 219. doi:10.1038/345219a0. 
    103. ^ Nicholls, R (2004). "Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios". Global Environmental Change 14: 69. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.007. 
    104. ^ Lovelock, James and Allaby, Michael, "The Greening of Mars" 1984
    105. ^ Vanlieshout, M, R.S. Kovats, M.T.J. Livermore and P. Martens (2004). "Climate change and malaria: analysis of the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios". Global Environmental Change 14: 87. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.009. 
    106. ^ Hulme, P.E. (2005). "Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of a global threat?". Journal of Applied Ecology 42 (5): 784. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01082.x. 
    107. ^ "Climate Change: Adapting to the inevitable". IMechE. http://www.imeche.org/NR/rdonlyres/FA401F02-3193-4A19-826A-3FEEFB89DEDE/0/ClimateChangeAdaptationReportIMechE.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-07. 
    108. ^ William J. Broad (27 June 2006). "How to Cool a Planet (Maybe)". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/27/science/earth/27cool.html?ex=1151985600&en=ca9e39a26d7e4ece&ei=5065&partner=MYWAY. Retrieved 10 March 2009. "...a controversial field known as geoengineering, which means rearranging the Earth's environment on a large scale to suit human needs and promote habitability" 
    109. ^ Keith, D.W., M. Ha-Duong and J.K. Stolaroff (2006). "Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air". Climatic Change 74: 17. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x. 
    110. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2006). "Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?". Climatic Change 77: 211. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y. 
    111. ^ http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/obamas-climate-guru-paint-your-roof-white-1691209.html
    112. ^ Weart, Spencer (2006). "The Public and Climate Change". in Weart, Spencer. The Discovery of Global Warming. American Institute of Physics. http://www.aip.org/history/climate/Public.htm. Retrieved 2007-04-14. 
    113. ^ Revkin, Andrew (2007-04-01). "Poor Nations to Bear Brunt as World Warms". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/01/science/earth/01climate.html?ex=1333080000&en=6c687d64add0b7ba&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Retrieved 2007-05-02. 
    114. ^ Brahic, Catherine (2006-04-25). "China's emissions may surpass the US in 2007". New Scientist. http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn11707-chinas-emissions-to-surpass-the-us-within-months.html. Retrieved 2007-05-02. 
    115. ^ http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/rudd-signs-kyoto-deal/2007/12/03/1196530553203.html
    116. ^ Max, Arthur. "US envoy says China wants top line US technology in exchange for reining in CO2 emissions". Star Tribune. Associated Press. http://www.startribune.com/world/47783247.html?elr=KArks7PYDiaK7DUjyDD:_HP5P:QUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU. Retrieved 2009-06-26. 
    117. ^ "Chinese object to climate draft". BBC. 2008-05-01. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6610653.stm. Retrieved 2009-05-21. 
    118. ^ Mufson, Steven (2007-06-06). "In Battle for U.S. Carbon Caps, Eyes and Efforts Focus on China". The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/05/AR2007060502546.html. Retrieved 2009-05-21. 
    119. ^ "China now top carbon polluter". BBC News. 2008-04-14. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7347638.stm. Retrieved 2008-04-22. 
    120. ^ "Group: China tops world in CO2 emissions". USA Today. Associated Press. 2007-06-20. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/2007-06-20-124188869_x.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-16. 
    121. ^ "Group: China surpassed US in carbon emissions in 2006: Dutch report". livemint.com. Reuters. 2007-06-20. http://www.livemint.com/2007/06/20235536/China-surpassed-US-in-carbon-e.html. Retrieved 2007-10-16. 
    122. ^ Casey, Michael (2007-12-07). "China Says West Should Deal With Warming". Newsvine. http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2007/12/07/1147788-china-says-west-should-deal-with-warming. Retrieved 2009-06-06. 
    123. ^ IANS (2009-02-05). "India can’t be exempt from mandatory greenhouse gas emission cap: John Kerry". Thaindian.com. http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/uncategorized/india-cant-be-exempt-from-mandatory-greenhouse-gas-emission-cap-john-kerry_100151668.html. Retrieved 2009-06-24. 
    124. ^ Pelham, Brett (2009-04-22). "Awareness, Opinions About Global Warming Vary Worldwide". Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/117772/Awareness-Opinions-Global-Warming-Vary-Worldwide.aspx. Retrieved 2009-07-14. 
    125. ^ "Summary of Findings". Little Consensus on Global Warming. Partisanship Drives Opinion. Pew Research Center. 2006-07-12. http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=280. Retrieved 2007-04-14. 
    126. ^ Blair, Tony (2009-07-03). "Breaking the Climate Deadlock". Kosovo Times. http://www.kosovotimes.net/project-syndicate/708-breaking-the-climate-deadlock.html. Retrieved 2009-07-03. 
    127. ^ Richards, Holly (2009-07-02). "Energy bill causing some tension among U.S. officials". Coshocton Tribune. http://www.coshoctontribune.com/article/20090702/NEWS01/907020302. Retrieved 2009-07-03. 
    128. ^ Begley, Sharon (2007-08-13). "The Truth About Denial". Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/id/32482. Retrieved 2007-08-13. 
    129. ^ Adams, David (2006-09-20). "Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial". The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2006/sep/20/oilandpetrol.business. Retrieved 2007-08-09. 
    130. ^ "Exxon cuts ties to global warming skeptics". MSNBC. 2007-01-12. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16593606. Retrieved 2007-05-02. 
    131. ^ Sandell, Clayton (2007-01-03). "Report: Big Money Confusing Public on Global Warming". ABC. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Business/story?id=2767979&page=1. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
    132. ^ U.S. Global Change Research Program (2009-06-06). "New Report Provides Authoritative Assessment of National, Regional Impacts of Global Climate Change" (PDF). Press release. http://www.globalchange.gov/images/cir/pdf/Climate-Impacts-PR_june-6-2009.pdf. Retrieved 2009-06-27. 
    133. ^ "Greenpeace: Exxon still funding climate skeptics". USA Today. 2007-05-18. http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2007-05-18-greenpeace-exxon_N.htm. Retrieved 2007-07-09. 
    134. ^ Ceres (2004-04-28). "Global Warming Resolutions at U.S. Oil Companies Bring Policy Commitments from Leaders, and Record High Votes at Laggards". Press release. http://www.ceres.org/news/news_item.php?nid=56. Retrieved 2007-07-27. 
    135. ^ de Granados, Oriana Zill (2007-04-24). "The Doubters of Global Warming". Frontline. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/reports/skeptics.html. Retrieved 2009-07-31. 
    136. ^ Revkin, Andrew C. (2009-03-08). "Skeptics Dispute Climate Worries and Each Other". New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/science/earth/09climate.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&sq=global%20warming%20skeptic&st=cse&scp=1. Retrieved 2009-07-31. 
    137. ^ Dyson, Freeman; Brockman, John (Editor) (2007-08-08). "Heretical thoughts about science and society". Edge - the third culture. http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/dysonf07/dysonf07_index.html. Retrieved 2009-07-31. 

    Further reading

    External links

    Wikipedia Books Wikipedia:Books has a book on: Global warming

    Find more about Global warming on Wikipedia's sister projects:

    Search Wiktionary Definitions from Wiktionary
    Search Wikibooks Textbooks from Wikibooks
    Search Wikiquote Quotations from Wikiquote
    Search Wikisource Source texts from Wikisource
    Search Commons Images and media from Commons
    Search Wikinews News stories from Wikinews
    Search Wikiversity Learning resources from Wikiversity

    Research

    Educational

    v • d • e
    Global warming and climate change
    Category:Global warming · Category:Climate change · Glossary of climate change · Index of climate change articles


    This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)

     
     

     

    Copyrights:

    Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Geography Dictionary. A Dictionary of Geography. Copyright © Susan Mayhew 1992, 1997, 2004. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Political Dictionary. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Copyright © 1996, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
    US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/.  Read more
    Science Dictionary. The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin. All rights reserved.  Read more
    Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Global warming".  Read more