answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

If car won't start, either battery is dead, or starter has failed, or fuel is bad, or fuel line is blocked, or spark plug has no spark. Cannot diagnose further without more details about the symptoms, such as EXACTLY what happens when you try to start it - what lights light up? Do headlights work at normal full brightness? Does enging make any clicking sound? Does engine turn over?

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: 91 accord SE 114k miles car won't start please help?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

114 c in a k?

114k


WHAT DOES 114K MEAN?

114


How much does a geologist make a year?

Anywhere from 60k to 300k, they usually start at 60k to 90k, than 4 years later they average 114k.


How much should you pay for a 02 RAV4 114K?

If it's the L package around 8-9.5k If it's the sport arpund 8-9k if it's the base around 6.5-7.5k


How do you clean the EGR port on a 1999 Honda Odyssey?

I had a similar trouble on a 2000 Odyssey. I replaced the egr myself, but the trouble returned. I then had Firestone check it and they did the same thing and cleaned the port. However the check engine light and the same trouble code kept coming back. I took it to the Honda dealer next and the they replaced the egr valve (again) and the catalytic converter (there was a code for the catalytic converter also.) It was all done under waranty with no charge, I had 78K miles and the waranty expired at 80K miles. I am now at 114k miles and have not had that problem again. Good luck.


What physical property is identical for the two isomers co C4H10?

The melting and boiling points are different. Butane has a melting point of 135.4K and 2-methylpropane [isobutane] has a melting point of 114K. The boiling point of Butane is 272.6K and isobutane @ 261K. It has to do with there structures. J


Was the 1989 Ford Tempo considered a good reliable car and if so what were the most common repairs required?

The 1989 Ford Tempo was anything but a reliable car. Very unreliable with many problems. Search these sites for info and reliability ratings. www.nada.com www.edmunds.com www.consumerreports.com www.msncars.comAnswerI disagree. I have a 1989 Ford Tempo, 2.3L, 114K miles, and have had it for over three years now. I have had very few problems with it. Very reliable -- if you take care of it. AnswerI have an 1988 ford tempo manual, and i have had only minor problems with it. It has 286K kilometer. I have replaced the altenator, starter and head gasget. however, my sister had an 1989 automatic, and she had basically the same problems. AnswerI very strongly believe that the 1989 ford tempo is the most reliable car out there. Ive had mine for 4 years and the only thing ive had to change was the oil. I put a body kit, rims, new aftermarket exaust and many other things to make my car superior to other cars. I think it is a very good car. AnswerI have a 1989 two door Ford Tempo I like it because it drives good when it doesn't stall out. This car to me is not even really driveable until I can get a person to work on it. AnswerNot a reliable car....2 starters,fuel pump and alternator within 1 1/2 yrs...now it is broke down again and it is a good chance it is the starter..again!!! AnswerAny car will have problems. I had an 88 with a 5 speed and it was onew of the most reliable and economical cars that I have owned.(I have owned about 15 cars in the last 20 years) I paid 650.00 for it and drove it for a year with only maintenace to pay for. (Brakes,oil changes) AnswerI had a 1985 Tempo (bought new). It had 156,000 miles and still got great mileage. I also have a 1993 with the V6 and it has 200,000 miles. The cars are only as good as the owner. If you maintain it well, it will last a long time. AnswerI have a 1991 Tempo 2.3 that currently has about 173,000 miles on it. It is a fantastic car. As long as you maintain it, it will get you where you need to be. Other than replacing parts as they go, I have not encountered any major issues. The DIY aspect is a little frustrating, it is difficult to reach some places, replacement parts are hard to come by (most have been discontinued), but it is easy to rig things that will work (i.e the air retrun on the catylitic converter was replaced by finding a suitable high temp rubber hose at an industrial hose wharehouse). I love this car and will hold onto it for years to come.


What value of resistor to light a LED on 230 volts?

To figure this out, you need to know the expected forward voltage and current of the LED. Lets assume 2ma and 2V. (Actually, 2ma is small, but I intend to make a point.) By Kirchoff's Voltage Law, you know that the signed sum of the voltage drops going around a series circuit must add up to zero. This means that the voltage across the resistor must be 228 volts. (-230 + 228 + 2 = 0) By Kirchoff's Current Law, you know that the signed sum of the currents entering a node is zero. As a consequence, you also know that the current at every point in a series circuit is the same. Therefore, the current through the resistor is also 2ma. By Ohm's Law, you know that resistance is voltage divided by current, so you know that the resistor is 228V divided by 2ma, which is 114K. The nearest standard value in the E12 scale is 100K. Recalculate the current for 100K, and you get about 2.25ma. (You could also use 120K, and I'll let you run the calculations yourself.) Don't stop here. There are some issues... By the power law, you know that power is voltage times current, so you know that the power dissipated by the resistor is 228V times 2.25ma, which is 513mW. I would put a one watt resistor in there. However, consider this. 2ma is a low current LED. Some of them pull 25ma. The power in the resistor in that case is about 6.5W, which is getting pretty high. Secondly, you need to consider the reverse breakdown voltage on the LED. I assume that when you said 230V, you meant AC, not DC, which means that there is going to be 230V (actually, a peak value of 325) across that LED for one half the line cycle. You need to check the datasheet and make sure the LED can handle that. If not, you need to put an ordinary signal diode, such as a 1N4148, in parallel with the LED, in the reverse direction, so that it clamps the reverse voltage at about 0.7 volts. (Don't worry about the reverse breakdown on the 1N4148, because the LED will protect it, on opposite half line cycles.) Last, but not least, you need to consider the safety of the operator. 230V is a high voltage, and LED's are not the most rugged thing around. If the LED breaks, you need to consider if its internal wiring could come into contact with the operator. I would certainly demand a UL listed device in this application.