If you say he was intoxicated, there should be a police report and arrest to that end, and it may mitigate your damages. However, no matter what his DL status or driving habit, it had nothing to do with you violating the right of way. Whether it was a soccer mom or drunk without a license coming your way, your actions were the same. The other driver will have to face the consequences of that which is his fault, but you will probably end up fixing his car.
A persons immigration status has no bearing on your liability. If you were at fault then you are liable for the damages you caused.
If you are not intoxicated and have a valid driver's license, you can drive others who are too impaired to drive themselves home. This is a socially responsible thing to do.
Why were you driving without a license? You will be prosecuted for the violation but it has nothing to with fault. If the other party was at fault their insurance is responsible for damages to your car. You will never get your license back. Habitual gets you jail time.
Most commonly, license revocations occur to people who have been caught driving while intoxicated.
The license status of the other driver has no bearing on your liability. If you were at fault you are still responsible for any damages and injuries. Just report it to your insurance company as you would any other accident.
all of the damages/injuries you caused along with (probably) many fines and penalitys possible loss of your license and plates.....sorry.....
Automatic, and immediate suspension of your drivers license.
YOUR CAR INSURCE
No way that could be dangurous
Jail time and/or fines, and you lose your license.
you will be held responsible/liable and have to pay for any and all damages, vehicle/injuries etc....also will likely lose your license/plates and have many many fines...
No, It is a crminal act to take anothers vehicle without their permission. The owner of the vehicle is not responsible for damages caused by a crminal in that act of auto theft or other non-permissive use.