0
Can something said prior to your rights being read be used against you in a court of law?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
yes is the answer. if you are dumb enough to answer police trick questioning. better off saying don't know
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who did Dred Scott v Sandford demonstrated that the Supreme Court cannot go against without risking popular anger and opposition?
The Supreme Court would not go against the concept of slaves being property as opposed to human beings and the court would not enforce the rights of a slave over the rights of his master. Congress had no right to prohibit slavery in the territories.
How are defendants protected from unreasonable sentence?
They are because they have rights against it in court.
What is a conservative Supreme Court most likely to do?
A conservative member of the supreme court is likely to make a ruling against immigration,against abortion rights and against tightening gun laws.
How did the supreme court rulings in 1883 work against the civil rights of 1875?
The Supreme Court rulings said civil rights were decided by state and local law.
How did the Supreme Court rules in 1883 worked against the civil rights act of 1875?
The Supreme Court rulings said civil rights were decided by state and local law.
Can a statement on police report be used against you at trial?
Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. Were you read your Miranda Rights. Did you sign a statement saying you understood these rights?
Why are Fundamental Rights different from Directive Principles?
There exist many differences. The most important being that the fundamental rights can be enforced by a court of law (against the state), while Directive Principles are not. Fundamental rights are inalienabe rights, whereas Directive Principles are aimed at securing welfare, which are more like constitutional guidelines.
How does the law stand on a father showing his child court papers?
There is no law regarding a father showing his children court papers. However, if the intent is to alienate the child against the other parent it can affect custody and visitation rights if brought to the court's attention.There is no law regarding a father showing his children court papers. However, if the intent is to alienate the child against the other parent it can affect custody and visitation rights if brought to the court's attention.There is no law regarding a father showing his children court papers. However, if the intent is to alienate the child against the other parent it can affect custody and visitation rights if brought to the court's attention.There is no law regarding a father showing his children court papers. However, if the intent is to alienate the child against the other parent it can affect custody and visitation rights if brought to the court's attention.
Civil suits for not being read Miranda rights?
Civil suits for not being read Miranda rights are generally not successful because the failure to read Miranda rights does not invalidate a conviction or provide a separate cause of action in civil court. Miranda rights are a procedural safeguard to protect a suspect's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination during custodial interrogations. If a person's Miranda rights are not read, any statements they make may be excluded from being used in a criminal trial, but it does not entitle them to file a civil suit.
What does contest mean?
Means wether something can be argued against successfully in court.
How did Thurgood Marshall fight the civil rights for negro people?
He made speeches against slavery and showed that blacks could do everything White men could do by being part of the Supreme Court.
What civil rights group won a number of important court cases against segregation in the 1950s?
The NAACP!
