clarify RTI joymaker RN
it was put in place to controll police powers.
I think it is the Judiciary Act of 1801, also called the midnight appointments. This Act increase the number of judges in the court systems where most of the new judges are Federalists. Jefferson later on passed the Judiciary Act of 1802, an implement to the older one. This implement allow him to impeach judges that are partisan and bias. Hope this help.
Authorities implemented the enclosure act by evicting people that did not own land. They also evicted people that said they owned land, but who could not prove it. This led to a high population of displaced and homeless people.
Conducting police calls to collect and dispose of solid waste
It was an Act of Parliament introduced by Sir Robert Peel to start a policing service in London. The first policemen were nicknamed Peelers or Bobbies after Sir Robert.
The Right to Information (RTI) Act came into force in India on October 12, 2005.
In general, you cannot obtain information from private companies under the RTI Act 2005.
nio
It's not banned; there is a J&K RTI Act 2009 which covers J&K State Gov't but its Information Commission is headless. Central bodies in J&K are covered under Central RTI Act 2005. But Central RTI does not apply to the State Government of J&K, unlike all the other states which are covered.
No>
no
As per the rules for deemed universities, CIC has clearly mention in its order(2011) that vinayaka mission come under RTI ACT.
Sir, Sections 8 and 9 protect the citizens right to privacy. Imagine if they were to do away with the "third party" thing in RTI.
You have provision of law to go for appeal. The Public Information Officer shall be held responsible and accountable. The Scenario have changed. Police and Bureaucrats fear RTI.
Veereshkumar nagashetty fought for the same along with the others
The full form of RTI is Right to Information. It is an Act of the Indian Parliament that empowers citizens to seek information from public authorities to promote transparency and accountability in the government.
According to my opinion ... Official Secrets Act 1923 is the father of RTI act 2005 , According to Official Secrets Act 1923, RTI can only provide certain amount of information to the people. Well about RTI , RTI needs a long term procedure, and the officials controlling this are the same officials working for that suspected Officer once or some maybe continuing to work, their is a series of chain, if the suspect is found guilty , the whole chain becomes guilty according to the law, RTI is good to get the information out , like to know how the system works in our high level of understanding but RTI is still not the best remedy to decide the Resignation. Filling an RTI is very easy , anyone can file it , but the complexity during RTI is again just a MIND GAME played by higher officials. Do you know why there is no RTI in Jammu and kashmir ?? And according to me RTI act doesnot promote transparency and but provides a little amount of accountability, how we can expect transparency if father of RTI , i.e, Official Secrets Act 1923 , is already present at the first place . ha ha ha... by, tanakiron