No, but that was what John Brown clearly had in mind.
Masters or just plain slave owners
North Slave owners did pay their slaves, but south slave owners didn't. See the following link.
The Southerners blamed the slave rebellions on the Northern abolitionists.
The slave owners bought their slaves at auctions.
To the Abolitionists, he as a Hero and Martyr. To the Southern slave owners, he was a Terrorist (to use an anachronistic contemporary term).
conflict between slave owners and abolitionists
Slaves, slave-owners, slave-drivers, Abolitionists and the organisers of the Underground Railroad.
Abolitionists did. Slave-owners did not. The rest were divided or undecided.
The Abolitionists helped slaves to escaped to Canada where slavery was illegal, this action make the southern felt they were robbing their property.
Was he involved in trying to stage the slave uprising against the plantation/slave owners?Following in the footsteps of Chris( the slave who organized the greatest revolt against the white plantation owners)
yes, because they owned them and they can do whatever they want to to them.
because if you were under the age of 21 you weren't free so owners killed slaves to keep them as slaves
Because they thought it was wrong to not even consider them people and that they were beaten and hurt by the slave owners. People who wanted slavery to end were called abolitionists.
After years of servitude, the slave finally obtained his manumission and gained his freedom.
Slave trade and slaves in general.
the white men benifitted, slave owners
abolitionists