Did the trial for Obama's Birth Certificate take place on jan26 2010?

Answer 1

There is no trail. The issue is dead. Obama will not provide a copy but the evidence suggests he was born in the U.S. They like to keep the issue alive to make fools of the "birthers".

Another Answer:

There is no credible information, only rumor about a new court date to refile this case.

In his decision, filed 10/29/09, United States District Judge, David O. Carter, made it quite clear that the plaintiffs had no standing to bring suit, had bypassed all Constitutional procedure to challange a sitting President's eligibility to hold the office, and stated finally, "Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants' (Obama, et al.) Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED."

This decision made in the US District Court makes it most unlikely that this matter can be scheduled to be heard in another court to be decided judicially because Judge Carter ruled that, "Plaintiffs attempt to subvert this grant of power to Congress by convincing the Court that it should disregard the constitutional procedures in place for the removal of a sitting president. The process for removal of a sitting president-removal for any reason-is within the province of Congress, not the courts."

The issue that President Obama's birth certificate is unavailable for review or is not genuine, was not presented by the plaintiffs. What they did present was a request for the court to issue a letter of request to the government of Kenya "for the birth certificate that they allege proves he was born in Kenya", which Judge Carter addressed as follows, "Even should the Court permit the issuance of a letter rogatory to Kenya, the Court would still engage in a comparative exercise in which the records of America, which has historically maintained some of the most credible recordkeeping practices in the world, would be contrasted with the credibility of the records obtained from Kenya. Such an analysis would seemingly favor the records of the United States."

I could not locate any actual facts to support the claim that President Obama's birth certificate or eligibility for the office of President is in question. The plaintiffs have never used the Constitutional recourse necessary to challange a sitting President. Until they do that, it would be fair to say that they cannot support their claims.