0
Do you think the validity of an argument or the persuasive skills of the person presenting the argument is the stronger factor.?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
In politics, charisma and oratory skill are probably more important than the substance of a politician's arguments, at least terms of popularity. The true substance of their arguments is often hidden or misrepresented,and this is the job of speechwriters, spin doctors and advisors.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The validity of the argument is typically the stronger factor in determining its strength. A logically sound argument supported by evidence is more likely to be considered persuasive, regardless of the presenter's skills. However, effective communication and delivery can enhance the persuasiveness of an argument.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Every argument should appeal to?
logic and reason, presenting evidence and sound reasoning to support its claims. By appealing to logic and reason, an argument can be more persuasive and effective in convincing others of its validity.
What is a persuasive argument in philosophy?
A persuasive argument in philosophy is a well-structured and logically sound presentation of reasons and evidence to support a particular claim or position. It aims to convince the audience of the validity of the argument through logical reasoning, clear definitions, and solid premises. The effectiveness of a persuasive argument lies in its ability to address potential objections and counterarguments while presenting a compelling case for the position being advocated.
When While writing a persuasive piece which appeal should you use to show the logic of your argument?
To show the logic of your argument in a persuasive piece, you should use the appeal of logos. This involves presenting rational evidence, facts, and logical reasoning to support your point of view. By using a logical appeal, you can convince your audience of the validity and soundness of your argument.
Why do writers use logos in a persuasive argument?
Writers use logos in a persuasive argument to appeal to the audience's logical reasoning and credibility. By providing facts, statistics, and evidence, writers can make a strong, rational case to support their argument and convince the audience of its validity. Using logos helps build a solid foundation for the argument and enhances its overall persuasiveness.
What is logos rhetoric?
Logos rhetoric is a persuasive technique that relies on logic and reasoning to make an argument or appeal to an audience. It involves presenting facts, data, and evidence to support a position and to convince others of the validity of a claim. Using logos rhetoric helps to establish credibility and build a strong, logical case for a particular viewpoint.
Which of these is a way to address a counter argument in a persuasive essay?
Acknowledge the validity of a counterargument, but highlight specific evidence that demonstrates the superiority of your argument
Are Valid arguments strong or weak?
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
What is arguementation?
Argumentation is the process of constructing and presenting a logical and persuasive argument to support a claim or viewpoint. It involves making a series of points based on evidence and reasoning, with the goal of convincing an audience or opponent of the validity of the argument. Effective argumentation requires critical thinking, organization, and the ability to anticipate and address counterarguments.
In writing What should an argument do?
An argument should present a clear point of view or claim supported by evidence and reasoning. It should anticipate and respond to counterarguments, showing why the claim is valid and persuasive. Ultimately, the goal is to convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
What is the evidence statement in a persuasive essay?
The evidence statement in a persuasive essay is a clear and specific statement that presents facts, statistics, examples, or expert opinions to support the writer's argument or claim. It is used to provide proof or support for the writer's position and convince the reader of the validity of their argument.
What should beThe thread of the argument and the presentation of the argument?
The thread of the argument refers to the logical progression and coherence of ideas presented within an argument. It should be clear and follow a logical structure, moving from one point to the next in a coherent and understandable manner. The presentation of the argument involves how the argument is communicated, including the use of evidence, examples, and persuasive language to support the main points and convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
How does your thesis relate to your supporting evidence?
The thesis statement is the main argument or claim of the essay, while the supporting evidence is used to provide validation or examples that back up the thesis. The evidence helps to strengthen the argument and convince the reader of the validity of the thesis statement. Together, the thesis and supporting evidence work in tandem to present a coherent and persuasive argument.
What is argument validity?
Argument validity refers to the property of a deductive argument when the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In valid arguments, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, only that the conclusion is well-supported by the premises.
What keys or tips can raise suspicion about the validity of arguments presented verbally and in writing?
Look out for vague or overly general statements, lack of supporting evidence or sources, use of emotional language or personal attacks, and logical fallacies like ad hominem arguments or circular reasoning. Additionally, consider the credibility and expertise of the person making the argument and be wary of any biases they may hold.
What are pieces of information you should collect notes on as you look through your sources?
I, II, and III I. information your reader will need to know about your topic II. information that might prove the validity of an argument or position III. information that might disprove the validity of an argument or position
What is an invalid argument?
In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.
What is Systematic presentation of reasoning and supporting evidence that proves the validity of a statement or position?
Argument
