yea
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
A non sequitur is something that does not logically follow. That statement is a non sequitur, and does not support your claims.
It wasn't necessary to 'create' any rules. They follow logically from the definition of exponents.
in my opinion, it isnt because you can follow celebrities and see what they are getting up to, and you can also follow your friends if they have witter :)
Yes, a deductive argument can have false premises. However, the conclusion does not follow logically if the premises are false, making the argument unsound.
it is your opinion but just follow your heart it will lead you to pie
it might do i think it does but that's my opinion
Non sequiturs are considered a logical fallacy because they involve making a conclusion that does not logically follow from the premises. This can lead to faulty reasoning and misleading arguments, as the conclusion is not based on relevant evidence or sound logic. In logical reasoning, conclusions should be directly supported by the premises presented, and non sequiturs violate this fundamental principle.
Well ... yes and no on that one. It really depends on what type of person you are, ask yourself this. Do you follow you're heart, or you're head? If you follow you're heart that means you tend to follow you're emotions. Then if you follow you're head you tend to thinking logically. Again yes and no.
People are entitled to their own opinion. People come to opinions based on facts, emotions and history. It is a personÕs responsibility to form their own opinion and not just follow others.
It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.
Yes. Contrary to popular opinion, judges do not make laws.