Larger States do NOT have more senators. Each state has 2 senators. The only thing that changes between states are the number of representatives that the state has. The number of representatives depends on the population of the state. Together this makes up the Electoral Vote for the presidential election. If a state, like in Massachusetts for example, if Mr. FlipFlop won the state then all the Electoral Votes for that state which is 12 go to the vote of that candidate. Te staes that presidential candidates want to win are Texas, California, Ohio, and Florida. They have the most electoral votes. ~Nicole, Age 12
No, larger states do not have the same amount of senators as smaller states. Each state has two senators regardless of population size.
States in the western part of the US are generally larger in area than states in the eastern part. This is because the western states were typically added to the Union later and therefore have more vast expanses of land.
Oklahoma is represented by two United States senators. As of September 2021, the senators are James Inhofe and James Lankford.
In the United States Senate, each state is represented by two senators regardless of population size. This is a result of the Great Compromise reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, which aimed to create a balance between states with differing populations.
There are two senators representing the state of South Carolina in the United States Senate.
To increase the number of senators in the U.S. Senate, a constitutional amendment would be required as the number of senators is fixed at two per state by the Constitution. Any change to this would need to go through the amendment process outlined in Article V of the U.S. Constitution.
The smaller states said that each state should have two state senators and the big states agreed. Then the big states said that they should have more Representatives because they have a bigger population and the small states agreed.
why the smaller states have difficulties trading with the larger states
larger states
There are many ways that a smaller and larger state can differ. The economy may be better because of more people in larger states, and there may be more activities a person can do in a larger state.
Because each state gets two senator's no matter how big they are so they get the same amount of voice as the larger states.
Because the larger states would have too much representation in the government. The smaller states were worried that they would loose their power in the government.
it was split as a compromise between the larger states and the smaller ones, the larger states wanted the amount of members to depend on the population of each state but the smaller ones wanted equal amount of members so they split congress up as a compromise
All states have people living with in them. The amount of people is determined by the size of the state's population. Larger states have a higher population and smaller states have lower populations.
"The Great Compromise" was the reason for the formation of the Senate (which pleased the smaller states.) Each state has two Senators.
2 per state was written into the constitution to settle an argument by the founders concerning the representatives of the small states vs the larger states. So, they created the two houses of Congress. One with everyone having 2 for each state and the other based on population of each state. In this way the smaller states wouldn't be out voted by the larger states in every issue.
because of the size.
Yes. Each state has 2 senators. It is the House of Representatives that splits the representatives by population count: California would have the highest because there are more people there than any other state.