I believe that it is easier to break when it is uncooked, it' snaps with little effort.
A raw egg would break 'faster' but it depeneds on what you mean by faster. If you mean it would break easier then yes, it would be a raw egg. This is because a cooked egg's calcium shell has become harder, thus the term 'hard boiled egg'.
cooked or raw cellulose is impossible to breakdown by humans
Can be eaten either raw or cooked!
Cooked it better. 60% say cooked. 40% say raw.
Cooked
Yes, you can do this. My mother in law always made spaghetti sauce with chicken legs and thighs (bone in) and meatballs made of plain hamburg. Heat sauce to simmering - don't boil it or it will splatter and burn. Add rinsed chicken legs / thighs and or meatballs into sauce, they don't need to be cooked, you add them raw. Simmer for about 40 mins, stirring gently after about 15 minutes making sure not to break the meatballs. Stir occasionally as it cooks. Serve sauce over spaghetti with the chicken on the side.
raw,uncooked
According to the National Pasta Association , 8 ounces of uncooked long pasta, such as spaghetti will yield 4 cups of cooked pasta. Thus, a "serving" of 2 oz. uncooked spaghetti will be the nutritional equivalent of 1 cup of cooked spaghetti.
They tend to be more dangerous than raw bones because they splinter easier and puncture the stomach and intestines.
The antonym for cooked would be raw
raw foods are foods that are not cooked and ate raw
raw