Does the multiple selves theory apply to brand decisions for consumers?

What does marketing and advertising do for a company?

Marketing and advertising theoretically increase a company's profit. Consumers will buy a product based on their perception of its value in relation to their own needs. So the purpose of marketing, beyond simply making consumers aware of a given product, is to convince them that they need it, and furthermore, that it outperforms its competitors. In theory, this will increase profits.

What is the model of consumer buying decision process?

Consumer decision-making models are widely used in consumer behavior research and study areas to structure theory and research.We all have to make choices. One of those most important decisions made in our life are based on the market - buying goods. The Consumer Decision Making Model can be applied with any economics decision you have to make.Three Decision-Making ModelsBeginning about 300 years ago, Bernoulli developed the first formal explanation of consumer decision making. It was later extended by von Neumann and Morgenstern and called the Utility Theory. This theory proposed that consumers make decisions based on the expected outcomes of their decisions. In this model consumers were viewed as rational actors who were able to estimate the probabilistic outcomes of uncertain decisions and select the outcome which maximized their well-being. However, as one might expect, consumers are typically not completely rational, or consistent, or even aware of the various elements that enter into their decision making. In addition, though consumers are good at estimating relative frequencies of events, they typically have difficulty translating these frequencies into probabilities. This Utility model, even though it had been viewed as the dominant decision-making paradigm, had serious shortcomings that could not be explained by the model. Nobel Laureate Herbert Simon proposed an alternative, simpler model in the mid-1950s. This model was called Satisficing, in which consumers got approximately where they wanted to go and then stopped the decision-making process. An example of this would be in the search for a new apartment. Under the Utility theory, consumers would evaluate every apartment in a market, form a linear equation based on all the pertinent variables, and then select the apartment that had the highest overall utility score. With Satisfying, however, consumers might just evaluate apartments within a certain distance to their desired location, stopping when they found one that was "good enough." This theory, though robust enough to encompass many of the shortcomings of Utility Theory, still left significant room for improvement in the area of prediction. After all, if a marketing executive can't predict consumer behavior, then what use is a decision-making paradigm. Simon and others have extended this area in the investigation of the field of bounded rationality. Following Simon, additional efforts were made to develop better understandings of consumer decision making, extending beyond the mathematical optimization of Utility Theory and the somewhat unsatisfying Satisfying Theory. In the late 1970s, two leading psychologists, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, developed Prospect Theory, which expanded upon both Utility Theory and Satisfying Theory to develop a new theory that encompassed the best aspects of each, while solving many of the problems that each presented. Two major elements that were added by Kahneman and Tversky were the concepts of value(replacing the utility found in Utility Theory) and endowment, in which an item is more precious if one owns it than if someone else owns it. Value provided a reference point and evaluated both gains and losses from that reference point. Additionally, gains and losses have a marginally decreasing increase from the reference point. For example, there is a much greater value for the first incremental gain from the reference point than for subsequent gains. Seven Decision-Making Strategies What this all led to was the development and exploration of a series of useful consumer decision-making strategies that can be exploited by marketers. For each product, marketers need to understand the specific decision-making strategy utilized by each consumer segment acquiring that product. If this is done, marketers can position their product in such a manner that the decision-making strategy leads consumers to select their product. The first two strategies are called compensatory strategies. In these strategies, consumers allow a higher value of one attribute to compensate for a lesser value of another attribute. For example, if a consumer is looking at automobiles, a high value in gas mileage might compensate for a lower value in seating space. The attributes might have equal weight (Equal Weight Strategy) or have different weights for the attributes (Weighted Additive Strategy). An example of the latter might be to place twice as much importance on gas mileage than seating space. The next three strategies are called noncompensatory strategies. In these strategies, each attribute of a specific product is evaluated without respect to the other attributes, and even though a product may have a very high value on one attribute, if it fails another attribute, it is eliminated from consideration. From Simon, the first of these is Satisficing, in which the first product evaluated to meet cutoff values for all attributes is chosen, even if it is not the best. The second of these strategies, Elmination By Aspects, sets a cutoff value for the most important attribute, and allows all competing products that meet that cutoff value to go to the next attribute and its cutoff value. The third strategy, Lexicographic, evaluates the most important attribute, and if a product is clearly superior to others, stops the decision process and selects that product; otherwise, it continues to the next most important attribute. The next two strategies are called partially compensatory strategies, in that strategies are evaluated against each other in serial fashion and higher values for attributes are considered. The first of these strategies is called Majority Of Conforming Dimensions, in which the first two competing products are evaluated across all attributes, and the one that has higher values across more dimensions, or attributes, is retained. This winner is then evaluated against the next competitor, and the one that has higher values across more dimensions is again retained. The second partially compensatory strategy is called Frequency of Good and Bad Features, in which all products are simultaneously compared to the cutoff values for each of their relevant attributes, and the product that has the most "good" features that exceed the cutoff values is the winner. There are other expansions upon these seven basic consumer decision-making strategies, but they are generally captured as shown above. However, two major areas of marketing theory also help to provide additional explanatory power to these strategies. Two Marketing Theories The first marketing theory is called Consideration. In this theory, consumers form a subset of brands from which the decision-making strategies are applied. For example, if asked to enumerate all the restaurants that one could recall, the list might be quite extensive for most consumers. However, when a consumer first addresses the question of where to dine that evening, a short list of restaurants that are actively considered is utilized for the decision-making process. Multistage decision-making models were summarized by Allan Shocker, in which the increasing complexity of a decision produces more steps in the decision process. In essence, more cognitive effort would be expended in evaluating members of the consideration set and reducing that number to an eventual choice. The second marketing theory is called Involvement, in which the amount of cognitive effort applied to the decision-making process is directly related to the level of importance that the consumer places on acquisition of the specific product. For example, there is rarely a significant amount of decision-making applied to the selection of a pack of chewing gum at the grocery store checkout counter, but there is a much greater amount of decision-making effort applied to the purchase of a new cell phone. This degree of involvement is not necessarily a function of the price, but is more related to the perceived impact on the quality of life of the consumer. The quality of life can come directly from the benefits supplied by the product, or can come indirectly from the social accolades or sanctions provided by members of the peer group. Summary Application of the three decision-making models, the seven decision-making strategies, and the two marketing theories can be seen in current efforts by marketing practitioners and academicians to tease apart the complex decisions made by consumers. For example, choice models and conjoint models are multivariate analysis techniques based on these understandings. Consumers are presented with choices in controlled environments that, hopefully, control for other confounding variables, and then the choices are decomposed to understand both the conscious and unconscious elements driving the consumer's choices.

What is an arbitrage pricing theory?

An arbitrage pricing theory is a theory of asset pricing serving as a framework for the arbitrage pricing model.

What does consumer choice mean?

A CHOICED CONSUMER IS ONE WHO KNOWS HIS OPTIONS AND CHOOSES RESPONSIBLY. Consumer choice is a theory of Microeconomicsthat relates Preferencefor consumption Good_(economics) and services to consumption expenditures and ultimately to Supply_and_demand. The link between personal preferences, consumption, and the demand curve is one of the most closely studied relations in economics. Consumer choice theory is a way of analyzing how consumers may achieve Equilibrium_(economics) between preferences and expenditures by maximizing Utilityas subject to consumer Budget_constraint.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the product life cycle theory?

The intended advantage of product life cycle theory is to maximize the profitability of the product. A few disadvantages are that sometimes products can see a revival in sales which the theory does not take into account. In addition, the theory doesn't take into account product redesign potential.

Does the multiple selves theory apply to brand decisions for consumers?

Add your answer:

What does marketing and advertising do for a company?

What is the model of consumer buying decision process?

What is an arbitrage pricing theory?

What does consumer choice mean?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the product life cycle theory?

What are the review theory of Neoclasical?

In which theory does one family member act as a leader and all members submit to his or her decisions?

Freudian theory and product personality?

What are the three theories of low involvement consumer behavior include?

Who propounded theory of multiple intelligence?

What is the goal Unitary executive theory?

Which theory of government makes the case that no one group of people controls the majority of government decisions?

How does economic theory apply in business management?

A person utilizing the deontological ethical theory to make decisions makes the correct moral choice based on?

Multiple causation theory developed by who?

Which theory of power are government decisions most influenced by ordinary people?

What theory contends that people have a natural capacity to make decisions about their lives?

Resources

Top Categories

Product

Company