At the age 18 there children are noticed as an adult and they would enjoy running there children places. the age 21 is the drinking age and all they are going to want to do is drink so imagain how that will turn out
The driving age should be raised to 18 because of the responsiblility of the kids.No it shouldnt!! no it should not sooo yeah
getting a lisense @ age 16 has been a rite for generations, but im taking my stand and im telling you y it should be raised.
Never.
No because at the age of 16 you are mature and tall enough and not much different from the age of 18 the difference's is that you are an adult but at 17 you are like an adult so 16 is not much different so no the driving age should and most likely would not be changed.
vcsdabhkjsad
no. they should start driving at age 2.
no
Yes and no. I can't wait to get my drivers license but at the same time, there are some teens who are very intent on getting their drivers license who are not mature enough to be able to drive. They don't take driving seriously and are very reckless about it. No. The age for driving should not be raised. I think we as a country should lower the age for drivers training and keep the driving age the same. That way people cant blame the accidents on en experienced drivers. Also, they wont have to depended on their parents to get from place to place because people are starting to get jobs at the age of 14. So those who think the age should be raised are basically saying that you are guilty and experienced before they even get into a car. Not to mention, the people that have their drivers license before 18 will get theirs taken away even if they are completely innocent.
yes it is but its going to be raised to the age of 83 befor you can drive
If anything it should be raised to 25/26. More emergencies are caused by young drivers than any other age - hence the high insurance premiums.
Yes.
No they should not as if they do there will be reckless driving more often even though the driving age has been lowered