0
How could New York State ratify the constitution even though there was a majority of anti federalists?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the federalists want to ratify the articles of confederation?
Yes, the Anti-Federalists were obviously against it, though.
How did the anti federalists writings influence the democratic government?
Anti-Federalists were responsible for defending states rights. Though they are the group that "lost" the debate regarding the United States Constitution, they are an important group in American history that has not only been overlooked, but may have been misnamed. During the time of the Anti-Federalists, members were concerned that the U.S. Constitution would create an overbearing central government. Though this did not happen, the Anti-Federalists were not in the wrong with their worries. This essay topic reviews an important part of the U.S. Constitution history.
Do the federalist papers preserve individual liberty?
Individual liberty is preserved through individual diligence. Though words can advocate liberty, or proclaim absolute rights, it is only through action that government is kept small so that individual liberty can be maximized. The Federalist Papers advocated ratification of the Constitution by arguing what the Constitution was and was not. The two factions at the time were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who supported the Constitution and were generally the wealthy, merchants, and those for whom a powerful centralized government was more important than individual liberty. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, led by Patrick Henry, were generally small farmers, business owners, and the working class who believed government was a necessary evil best kept small and local. They saw the newly proposed Constitution as a threat to both individual liberty and States' rights. The Federalist Papers were a collection of letters written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, all signed "Publius", designed to persuade New Yorkers to support the ratification of the new U.S. Constitution. The compromise that was made to get the Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution was the agreement to create a "Bill of rights" whereby specific individual rights would be outlined, and further restrictions would be placed on the Federal Government, such as the 9th and 10th Amendments which deny Federal authority for any power not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. (Which is why 90% of the Federal Government today can be accurately described as Unconstitutional) (www.PatriotMusic.com)
What did Bill of Rights have?
The Bill of Rights were a guarantee that certain rights would be upheld even though not specifically stated in the Constitution. The Bill of Rights includes the first 10 amendments of the Constitution including freedom of speech, assembly, due process, guarantees against cruel and unusual punishment and the right to bear arms. While the Federalists assumed that these rights were simple common sense and should not be included in the Constitution because by enumerating rights you were in turn limiting them, the anti-Federalists were afraid that if they were not specifically stated then they would be violated. These amendments were a concession granted to ensure adoption of the Constitution.
The two political parties that either supported or attacked the Constitution were?
At the time of the writting of the Constitution by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention, there were no political parties in the United States. Two groups emerged to fight for or against ratification of the new Constitution. Those who favored the Constitution were called Federalists. Those who opposed the Constitution became known as Anti-Federalists. Once the Constitution was ratified, political parties did emerge, even though many of the Founding Fathers, especially George Washington, opposed the creation of political parties, or "factions" as they were then called. The Federalists did become our first political party, led by men such as John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. Those who had been against the ratification of the Constitution soon joined with others who favored states' rights over a too powerful federal government. They became the second Political Party called the Democratic-Republicans, led by men like Jefferson.Read more: Who_were_the_two_political_parties_that_supported_the_Constitution
Did the federalists want to ratify the articles of confederation?
Yes, the Anti-Federalists were obviously against it, though.
How did federalists and anti federalists view the role of the federal government differently and how did they feel about the constitution as a result?
Federalists believed in a strong central government. Obviously, the anti-federalists believed the very opposite. Some federalists might not have been completely satisfied with the US Constitution, but nobody really could be. The anti-federalists were very displeased with the US Constitution, though.
How did the Federalists think the Constitution should be interpreted?
During the Founding Period of American History and in the years that initially followed, the Federalists consistently interpreted the Constitution in a 'robustly federalistic' manner. That is, they saw it as providing for a very active and responsible federal American government, whether in respect to its judicial, legislative, or executive branches and their various functions.
Why didn't all states ratify the constitution?
They all did ratify, but some battles were harder than others. It depended on how many delegates had been there (Pennsylvania was one of the first 9 to ratify and it had 8 delegates), which delegates they were, and how many Anti-Federalists there were. The fight for ratification in New York was particularly bitter, as they had one delegate (who lost his vote when the other 2 NY delegates left), a slew of ardent Anti-Federalists, and several nasty exchanges in the ratification convention. It was actually that that led to the creation of the Federalist Papers. Other states were easier, like Delaware, which was the first state because it was the first to ratify.
How did the anti federalists writings influence the democratic government?
Anti-Federalists were responsible for defending states rights. Though they are the group that "lost" the debate regarding the United States Constitution, they are an important group in American history that has not only been overlooked, but may have been misnamed. During the time of the Anti-Federalists, members were concerned that the U.S. Constitution would create an overbearing central government. Though this did not happen, the Anti-Federalists were not in the wrong with their worries. This essay topic reviews an important part of the U.S. Constitution history.
Opposition to ratification of the Constitution was based on the belief that it would?
Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution, stating that a weak national government almost tore apart the country after the Revolutionary War. Anti-Federalists, though, argued that it would provide for elite control, endanger liberty, and weaken the states The Bill of Rights was added as a result..........[USA TEST PREP ANWSER]
Who was the first state to join the Union?
I'm not sure you can properly call it a "union" if there's only one state in it, but Delaware was the first state to ratify the US constitution.By the same logic, Pennsylvania (the second state to ratify the US constitution) wasn't really joining a union but forming one (with Delaware).The third state to ratify the constitution (New Jersey) was therefore the first state that can unambigously be said to have joined an existing union of other states.In practice, though, the Union is considered an ideal that existed as of the creation of the Constitution, and each state that ratified the constitution was joining that (hypothetical) union, so Delaware is really the first.
Do the federalist papers preserve individual liberty?
Individual liberty is preserved through individual diligence. Though words can advocate liberty, or proclaim absolute rights, it is only through action that government is kept small so that individual liberty can be maximized. The Federalist Papers advocated ratification of the Constitution by arguing what the Constitution was and was not. The two factions at the time were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who supported the Constitution and were generally the wealthy, merchants, and those for whom a powerful centralized government was more important than individual liberty. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, led by Patrick Henry, were generally small farmers, business owners, and the working class who believed government was a necessary evil best kept small and local. They saw the newly proposed Constitution as a threat to both individual liberty and States' rights. The Federalist Papers were a collection of letters written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, all signed "Publius", designed to persuade New Yorkers to support the ratification of the new U.S. Constitution. The compromise that was made to get the Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution was the agreement to create a "Bill of rights" whereby specific individual rights would be outlined, and further restrictions would be placed on the Federal Government, such as the 9th and 10th Amendments which deny Federal authority for any power not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. (Which is why 90% of the Federal Government today can be accurately described as Unconstitutional) (www.PatriotMusic.com)
Why does the constitution require an extraordinary majority for the ratification of the amendments to the constitution?
Answer 1Because the framers of the Constitution wanted to make it difficult to change the Constitution in order to be certain that a strong majority was in favor of the change, and therefore discourage "frivolous" changes.Answer 2I think the answer to this question is to draft a Declaration of Independence.
What were the weaknesses in the Anti-Federalists' arguments against the Constitution?
Articles of Confederation and Shay's Rebellion Even though they didn't like the constitution, they didn't have a solution for their problem. you could use Thomas Hobbs and say that people in general are self interested there are a lot more you just have to look it up.
What did Bill of Rights have?
The Bill of Rights were a guarantee that certain rights would be upheld even though not specifically stated in the Constitution. The Bill of Rights includes the first 10 amendments of the Constitution including freedom of speech, assembly, due process, guarantees against cruel and unusual punishment and the right to bear arms. While the Federalists assumed that these rights were simple common sense and should not be included in the Constitution because by enumerating rights you were in turn limiting them, the anti-Federalists were afraid that if they were not specifically stated then they would be violated. These amendments were a concession granted to ensure adoption of the Constitution.
The two political parties that either supported or attacked the Constitution were?
At the time of the writting of the Constitution by the delegates to the Constitutional Convention, there were no political parties in the United States. Two groups emerged to fight for or against ratification of the new Constitution. Those who favored the Constitution were called Federalists. Those who opposed the Constitution became known as Anti-Federalists. Once the Constitution was ratified, political parties did emerge, even though many of the Founding Fathers, especially George Washington, opposed the creation of political parties, or "factions" as they were then called. The Federalists did become our first political party, led by men such as John Adams and Alexander Hamilton. Those who had been against the ratification of the Constitution soon joined with others who favored states' rights over a too powerful federal government. They became the second Political Party called the Democratic-Republicans, led by men like Jefferson.Read more: Who_were_the_two_political_parties_that_supported_the_Constitution
