Some say that treaty that Germany was forced to sign at the end of WWI made WWII inevitable. They say that actually, WWII began on that day. I am sorry that I do not know more, but what is now Germany has had many wars through History. Of course, all of Europe is no stranger to war.
That is not to imply that any group of people is good or bad. Only to say that wars are nothing new, but please, let us learn to get along with each other. Including intelligent, fair and honest treaties.
The Military Industrial Complex makes fortunes off of them, but the rest of us need to work to avoid them. If you seek profit, learn that honest, helpful profit, is actually much better for everyone.
==============
I have left the above answer for the sake of never discounting the opinions of fellow contributors. Here are the mandates of the Treaty of Versailles and with 20-20 hindsight it's clear that the mandates did not make WW2 inevitable, and that will be addressed after the mandates are listed.
1. The German army was not allowed to have more than 100,000 soldiers and no tanks were permitted, no warplanes, six naval vessels were allowed. No submarines were allowed.
1. The following was taken away from Germany as a results of the mandates in the Treaty of Versailles:
2. German Territories were ceded to other nations such as:
2a. France; Belgium; Denmark; Czechoslovakia; Poland & Russia.
2b. The League of Nations took over all of Germany's overseas colonies.
The Rhineland was to free of any German military forces.
Huge sums of money had to paid to the victorious Allies.
Important:
Up until at least 1938, the Allies had the power to enforce all of these mandates. They chose appeasement instead.
Most of the mandates were broken....
The military Industrial Complex had no roll in keeping France or England in or out of enforcing the mandates.
In a democracy, it's up to the people to vote for good candidates. The defense industries of any government are under the control of civilians.
Clearly these mandates were severe. There was little in conflicts because the Allies allowed the Nazi Party to break the mandates with hardly a whimper from them.
AlliancesImperialismsmilitarismnationalismThese isms had a cause or led to world war 1.
It didn't. Trade disputes played no part in the causes of WW 1.
There is a lot of criticism of WW1, however, one of the main fundemental criticisms often pointed out is that WW1 is the cause of WW2. As much as I would like to talk about this topic; I frankly cba!!
WW1 used trench warfare. Causing a dead zone. where if anyone popped out of their trench they would most likely died. It cause many stalemate conflicts. Also, planes, tanks, and gas (even gatling gun) were new styles of fighting brought out by this war. So no tatics were thought of during this time. Laslty, during this time there were many treaties of allies going on, causing many countries to join the war when it was only two tiny countries that were actually angry. Look up ww1 western front and eastern front to learn of trench warfare for this was primary cause of the many deaths.
He didn't. Darwin had no role in WW1, and had been dead for 32 years when the war started.
Yes, unresolved conflicts after WWI directly lead to WWII.
WW1 , WW2, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq
Most colonies probably felt the same, except the German colonies had all become Mandates of the UK, France or Belgium.
2
deisis
empire rivalry
Bad ones.
cause dey are awsome
the main cause of bawku conflict is about land and a chieftance.
The main cause of WW1 was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.
No, the so called scramble for Africa was not a cause of WW1.
Trick question, it never did.