0
Just becoming a recognized monarch meant that the leader was very good as a military leader and a political leader.When the institution became hereditary,justifications became religious,in that the monarch was chosen and blessed by God for the position.But,the monarch then had to show that s/he was a capable commander-and-chief of the military as well as an adept politician who was able to garner the aid of important people to keep the monarchical government running.
Well nowadays I don't think they use any method to justify or mantain their power because they actually don't have any. Today's monarchs only work to "represent" countries and to mantain that "nice" tradition of having a king or a queen in a great palace with the quards and stuff. Although it's a really stupid reason to justify the fact of having a crown, that can show you how stupid is having a monarchy still in the 21st century.
However, I know that some centuries ago, monarchs that wanted to take all the decitions and to have the judicial, legislative and ejecutive power of the nation (absolute monarchs), justify this just by saying that they were god's representatives in that country; and knowing how religious people were, they just believed it, beause "why wouldn't our perfect god choose the most suitable person to govern?" And they mantained it just giving great pensions to people who had the enogh power or strength to steal the crown, the nobles. And that's also why noblity didn't have to pay taxes at all. But, at least in Europe, that started to change in 1789.
Shane Gerhold
Frances Nicolas
Just becoming a recognized monarch meant that the leader was very good as a military leader and a political leader.When the institution became hereditary,justifications became religious,in that the monarch was chosen and blessed by God for the position.But,the monarch then had to show that s/he was a capable commander-and-chief of the military as well as an adept politician who was able to garner the aid of important people to keep the monarchical government running.
Well nowadays I don't think they use any method to justify or mantain their power because they actually don't have any. Today's monarchs only work to "represent" countries and to mantain that "nice" tradition of having a king or a queen in a great palace with the quards and stuff. Although it's a really stupid reason to justify the fact of having a crown, that can show you how stupid is having a monarchy still in the 21st century.
However, I know that some centuries ago, monarchs that wanted to take all the decitions and to have the judicial, legislative and ejecutive power of the nation (absolute monarchs), justify this just by saying that they were god's representatives in that country; and knowing how religious people were, they just believed it, beause "why wouldn't our perfect god choose the most suitable person to govern?" And they mantained it just giving great pensions to people who had the enogh power or strength to steal the crown, the nobles. And that's also why noblity didn't have to pay taxes at all. But, at least in Europe, that started to change in 1789.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoJust becoming a recognized monarch meant that the leader was very good as a military leader and a political leader.When the institution became hereditary,justifications became religious,in that the monarch was chosen and blessed by God for the position.But,the monarch then had to show that s/he was a capable commander-and-chief of the military as well as an adept politician who was able to garner the aid of important people to keep the monarchical government running.
Well nowadays I don't think they use any method to justify or mantain their power because they actually don't have any. Today's monarchs only work to "represent" countries and to mantain that "nice" tradition of having a king or a queen in a great palace with the quards and stuff. Although it's a really stupid reason to justify the fact of having a crown, that can show you how stupid is having a monarchy still in the 21st century.
However, I know that some centuries ago, monarchs that wanted to take all the decitions and to have the judicial, legislative and ejecutive power of the nation (absolute monarchs), justify this just by saying that they were god's representatives in that country; and knowing how religious people were, they just believed it, beause "why wouldn't our perfect god choose the most suitable person to govern?" And they mantained it just giving great pensions to people who had the enogh power or strength to steal the crown, the nobles. And that's also why noblity didn't have to pay taxes at all. But, at least in Europe, that started to change in 1789.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did monarchs justify and maintain the power?
they didnt!
How did monarchs justify and maintain there power in European history?
stuip
Where did monarchs get power?
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Where did monarchs get their power?
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
How did European monarchs justify their positions?
They thought that God had given them the right to rule as they chose.
Why did monarchs censor enlightenment writers?
Monarchs censored Enlightenment writers because the ideas promoted by these writers often challenged the traditional authority of the monarchy and the Church. Monarchs saw these ideas as a threat to their power and control over society. Censorship was a way for them to maintain their authority and suppress dissenting views.
How do absolute monarchs differ from constitutional monarch in their ability to use power?
the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
Why is the devine right important?
The divine right theory holds that rulers are chosen by a higher power, giving them legitimacy to rule. This concept was often used to justify monarchs' authority and maintain stability in their rule. Despite controversy, the divine right theory played a significant role in shaping the political landscape of many societies throughout history.
How did monarchs in Europe justify their right to rule?
European monarchs used the Divine Right of Kings to justify every action taken during his or her reign. This came as a result of the Reformation and various other religious struggles within and against the Catholic church. With the Church's power collapsing, Kings such as Henry VIII became keeper of the faith and sought to unite the church. The monarchs began to enforce the idea that they were told directly by God that they were subject to God only. Works such as Hobbe's Leviathan claimed that the sovereign's power came from God and therefore it was sacrilegous to do anything against that power. People accepted that due to their ignorance with the exception of the nobles who saw that the King's unifying power was undermining their own feudal roles.
How did monarchs justify absolutism?
Monarchs justified absolutism by claiming that they possessed a divine right to rule, meaning that their authority came directly from God. They argued that they were chosen to govern and protect their subjects, and that their rule was necessary to maintain order and stability in society. Additionally, some monarchs promoted the idea that they were uniquely qualified to make decisions and provide guidance, as they were believed to possess superior wisdom and knowledge.
How did the Monarchs justified and maintained their power?
they didnt!
How did the absolute monarchs exercise their power?
theee
