They were very reactionary. Instead of realizing that their class status was similar to that of the slaves in the sense that they were also subjected to capitalist exploitation, they took sides with the big capitalist exploiters against the exploited and oppressed slaves.
Poor whites often saw slaves as competition for jobs and viewed them as undermining their economic prospects. This sometimes led to animosity between the two groups, as poor whites felt threatened by the availability of cheap labor provided by slaves. Additionally, the racial hierarchy of the time often made poor whites feel superior to slaves, despite their shared economic struggles.
Slaves were owned as property, had no rights, and were subjected to brutal living and working conditions. Poor whites, while still disadvantaged, had the potential to earn wages and had some basic legal rights as free individuals. Additionally, poor whites were not subject to the same level of dehumanization and exploitation that enslaved individuals experienced.
Slave owners feared poor whites because they were seen as competition for labor resources. Poor whites could potentially undermine the hierarchical structure of society by forming alliances with slaves to challenge the institution of slavery. Additionally, poor whites posed a threat to the economic interests of slave owners by demanding higher wages or better working conditions.
Virginians kept relations friendly with poor whites by promoting a sense of racial solidarity and emphasizing shared interests and values. This often involved messaging that reinforced the idea of a common enemy—such as the wealthy elite or people of color—as a way to unite poor whites with the broader white community in Virginia. Additionally, providing economic opportunities and social support to poor whites helped maintain goodwill and cooperation among different socioeconomic groups in the state.
The rich Virginians kept relations friendly with poor whites by providing economic opportunities, such as jobs and land. They also used social events and cultural institutions to foster a sense of community. Additionally, they emphasized racial solidarity to prevent poor whites from aligning with enslaved Africans.
Poor whites in the South supported slavery because it provided them with a sense of social and racial superiority over enslaved individuals. They also believed that the labor provided by enslaved people helped maintain their own social and economic status within society. Additionally, some were drawn to the idea of owning slaves as a potential source of wealth and status symbols.
They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves.
they allowed poor whites the use of their plantation barns use plantation barns They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves
So that the poor whites could have slaves get thangs for them
they allowed poor whites the use of their plantation barns use plantation barns They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves
they allowed poor whites the use of their plantation barns use plantation barns They allowed poor whites the use of their skilled slaves
Slaveholders wanted poor whites to feel superior to slaves, so that they would not unite with slaves to challenge the existing power structure. By convincing poor whites that they were better than slaves, slaveholders ensured that their control over slaves remained unchallenged. Additionally, slaveholders sought to maintain social order and stability by preventing potential uprisings or rebellions.
Slaveholders tried to convince poor whites that slavery was justified to maintain social order and prevent potential alliances between poor whites and slaves that could threaten the existing power structure. By promoting the idea that whites were superior and deserved more rights and privileges than slaves, slaveholders aimed to divide and control the lower classes to safeguard their own economic interests.
Human beings who live and work together are bound to form relationships of some ... Fully 3/4 of Southern whites did not even own slaves; of those who did, 88% ... They may have been poor, but they were not slaves, and they were not black. ... Black people had to stand in water for hours at a time in the sweltering sun.
ANSWER:Not all Whites in the South owned land, nor did they have slaves. Many Whites were just as poor as the Black slaves. Many had to hire themselves out to do work for the wealthy land owners.Some Whites were sharecroppers with powerful plantation owners. Of course the wealthy land owners would take advantage of the Whites, just as they did with their slaves.
Slaves were owned as property, had no rights, and were subjected to brutal living and working conditions. Poor whites, while still disadvantaged, had the potential to earn wages and had some basic legal rights as free individuals. Additionally, poor whites were not subject to the same level of dehumanization and exploitation that enslaved individuals experienced.
They needed their political support.
Slave owners feared poor whites because they were seen as competition for labor resources. Poor whites could potentially undermine the hierarchical structure of society by forming alliances with slaves to challenge the institution of slavery. Additionally, poor whites posed a threat to the economic interests of slave owners by demanding higher wages or better working conditions.