Both the rich and poor in ancient Rome had fun in basically the same way. They would pull practical jokes and pranks on Saturnalia, both classes went to the races, gladiatorial contests, and other public ceremonies. There was also the theater. The only difference in these public entertainments was the seating arrangements. In private, rich and poor had about the same Board Games, individual contests and the all time favorite, dice. The only difference is that the rich would more than likely have more expensive gaming materials---the deluxe edition of dice or knucklebones, rather than the standard.
they are called PATRITIONS and the poor people were called PLEBIANS.
No they did not. The rich lead a life of opulence and the poor struggle to survive.
The rich became richer and the poor become poorer. The state distributed a free grain dole the the poor.
rich and poor
The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.The equestrians or equites in ancient Rome were a social class and they were rich as they were the businessmen and merchants of the empire.
rome is rich
In Rome they want to get the rich and poor separated so they had the military for justice.
beacuse it did.:)
Yes, the poor people would work for or be slaves for the rich, the poor people were the plebeians and the rich were called the patricians; the equestrians was another of the classes.
Rome was in trouble on 135 B.C because farmers lost their land, meaning Rome lost its economy. Merchants became very poor because luxuries were available in other places for rich Romans to buy, artisans lost their business because the Romans wanted to buy from Syria and Greece, and government officials were to busy getting money to worry about the republic's problems. The gap between the rich and the poor grew. The poor hated the rich and the rich hated the poor. Because of all this, Rome lost its political stability.
they are called PATRITIONS and the poor people were called PLEBIANS.
Water and diluted wine were the main drinks of all Romans, both rich and poor.
The twelve tables
No they did not. The rich lead a life of opulence and the poor struggle to survive.
The rich became richer and the poor become poorer. The state distributed a free grain dole the the poor.
The widening gap between the rich and the poor.
they where extremely poor and laws where not helping them against rich people.