Want this question answered?
Through peer review
It is important for scientists to communicate their results accurately so that they can be used. Other scientists use this information for their own research.Accuracy in reported experimental results is critical for many reasons:1. Unless the reported results are accurate, other scientists may be unable repeat the experiment successfully.2. Inaccurate results could result in bad decisions being made based on incorrect data.3. Inaccurate results could throw off the results of other experiments that rely on that data.4. In some cases, inaccurate results could end up being dangerous, resulting in an explosion or poisoning.
The strongest piece of evidence for the endosymbiotic theory is the fact that mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own circular DNA, prokaryote fashion, and can still replicate, transcribe and translate some proteins. Their ribosomes are also fashioned as a prokaryotes would be.
No... it is not possible to interpret social reality objectively, but subjectively. Because unlike scientist who can carry experiments inside laboratories on a particular object, a social scientist is unable to conduct experiments inside four walls. Also the conclusions of social scientists are based on their own understandings and interpretation of reality subjectively.Hope this answers your question.
There are several reasons: * To inform other scientists who are interested in the same sort of thing of the progress that has been made. Others can either stop looking, incorporate their answer to part of the question that was puzzling them, or move onto the next stage of the problem. * To establish that they were the first to discover the answer to a problem. This provides "bragging rights" and helps them become credible in their community. Publicity is an essential part of getting more money for future research etc * To promote peer review and comment. Everyone is blind to their own faults. Different eyes may see problems that the first researcher has missed
Through peer review
It is important for scientists to communicate their results accurately so that they can be used. Other scientists use this information for their own research.Accuracy in reported experimental results is critical for many reasons:1. Unless the reported results are accurate, other scientists may be unable repeat the experiment successfully.2. Inaccurate results could result in bad decisions being made based on incorrect data.3. Inaccurate results could throw off the results of other experiments that rely on that data.4. In some cases, inaccurate results could end up being dangerous, resulting in an explosion or poisoning.
He pubish is own atomic theory in 1803 developed his atomic theory by observations gathered from many experiments .
No
Scientists must be able to reproduce the results of experiments done by others in order to verify each other's conclusions. Using the same units worldwide removes the potential for error in converting between units or confusion between units which have different values in different places (e.g.: English mile, Irish mile, French mile, etc.).
He was a theoretical physicists. For his work that made him famous, he did not need to run a laboratory. He is also known for his famous thought experiments. These were not real experiments, just hypothetical experiments he ran in his mind. Some of these thought experiments have been proven to be wrong, but they still contributed significantly to our understanding of physics. On the other hand, as he needed, he collaborated with other scientists who had their own labs either to develop new theories or to verify his previously stated arguments.
The strongest piece of evidence for the endosymbiotic theory is the fact that mitochondria and chloroplasts have their own circular DNA, prokaryote fashion, and can still replicate, transcribe and translate some proteins. Their ribosomes are also fashioned as a prokaryotes would be.
You might start by making some simple experiments on your own, to confirm or disprove your assumptions.
No... it is not possible to interpret social reality objectively, but subjectively. Because unlike scientist who can carry experiments inside laboratories on a particular object, a social scientist is unable to conduct experiments inside four walls. Also the conclusions of social scientists are based on their own understandings and interpretation of reality subjectively.Hope this answers your question.
Endotherms or homeotherms are animals that can produce their own body heat through internal processes such as metabolism. They are able to regulate their body temperature independently of the external environment.
Galileo heard of their experiments and stared experimenting on his own.
you wont get the right answers that you need