The defendant is the one being sued in the court. It is their job to "defend" themselves against the allegations being brought in front of the court. Plaintiff - Complain Defendant - Defend
if a person is attacking it will fight with its claws and its mouth
A person accused of witch-hunting would typically defend themselves by presenting evidence that disproves the accusations against them. They may also argue that the allegations are baseless, politically motivated, or driven by personal vendettas. They might seek witnesses, testimonials, or any other form of evidence that supports their innocence and undermines the credibility of the accusations.
Yes, so the other person can defend themselves through their lawyer
Your question is not well phrased. The law allows someone to kill to defend themselves, they nevertheless still have to prove such a circumstance. Should a person be allowed to kill in self-defense? That is a personal choice.
Yes a person can defend themselves against sociopathic character assassination by not allowing the behavior to be concealed. Exposure of the behavior of a sociopath forces them to acknowledge their incorrect behavior if they are confronted in the proper manner.
They multiply one person's ability to defend themselves without having to rely on personal physcial strength.
Yes. The person who makes the false allegations can be held accountable both civilly and possibly criminally.
they can trample a person to death in no time flat, they use their trunk and their tusks to defend themselves.
The only, only, only reason is if someone is beating up on a person who cannot defend themselves.
If possible, yes, you should try your best to stop your friend from attacking another person. However, if your friend is attacked first then they will have to defend themselves.
Not necessary