0
How does the Bill of Rights ensure due process was met in Terry v. Ohio?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Terry v. Ohio, 392 US 1 (1968)
Whereas the Constitution established government power and limits, the Bill of Rights establishes individual limits and rights. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures.
The Supreme Court, in interpreting the Fourth Amendment, determined in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), that it is not an unreasonable search if, upon reasonable suspicion, an officer conducts a brief pat-down of a suspect to check for weapons.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the British Bill of Rights ensure the equality of citizens?
Britain doesn't have a bill of rights
What is due process and what is its relationship with the Bill of Rights?
What is due process and what is its relationship with the bill of rights?
What is a good sentence using the word bill of rights?
the bill of rights was established to ensure domestic tranquility
Who is the father of the Bill of Rights?
the Father of the Bill of rights is James Madison
What were the purpose and meaning of the Bill of Rights as it emerged from the ratification process?
The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. The purpose and meaning of the Bill of Rights as it emerged from the ratification process, was to preserve the liberties England's revolution laws threatened.
Does the English Bill of Rights ensure that there are no abuses of power by the monoarchy?
True
Why did the founding fathers demand a Bill of Rights?
to ensure individual liberties
Purpose of the Bill of Rights?
The purpose of the bill of rights was to ensure public confidence and prevent incorrect and unlawful behavior.
Is the bill of rights a formal or informal amendment process?
The Bill of Rights was formally adopted into the US constitution.
What is the incorporation of the bill of rights?
the process of applying the Bill of Rights to state governments as well as the federal government
The Supreme court's decision in Miranda v Arizona was based mainly on?
the incorporation of due process rights in the Bill of Rights so as to make them apply to the states
What were the antifederalist reasons for opposing ratification?
They believed that the rights that are now guaranteed through the Bill of Rights needed to be stated in some kind of Bill of Rights. Our basic rights should be written in a sort of Bill of Rights to ensure that we were guaranteed those rights.
