Sharecropping trapped many southern blacks after the Civil War. In this system, landless farmers, often former slaves, worked the land owned by others and in return received a small share of the crops. However, they often remained in cycles of debt and poverty due to unfair rental agreements and lack of economic independence.
It drove whites and blacks together socially.
sharecropping
"Separate but equal" segregation. Nullifying the Fifteenth Amendment. Instituting sharecropping systems.
share cropping started when slavery was over and the blacks had no place to go so the whites went to talk to the blacks who didn't have any place to go they stopped and asked do you need help or a job? they said yes and when they were sharecropping the whites made more money and only paid the blacks $2.00. but until they got smarter the blacks knew the whites were taking over all of the money. after that the blacks disagreed with the whites and then segregation started.(that is all of the info u need from me jessica hightower.
Following emancipation,sharecropping came to be an economic arrangement that kept the status quo between blacks and whites
Sharecropping was not good for Blacks as it often trapped them in cycles of debt and poverty. They had little control over their own lives, were exploited by landowners, and faced discrimination and violence. Sharecropping perpetuated the legacy of slavery and limited economic opportunities for Black individuals and families.
Sharecropping and institution just as bad as slavery.
Landownership would be an antonym for sharecropping, as it refers to owning land outright as opposed to a tenant farming arrangement.
Because no-one wanted them to. The Black Codes limited their ambitions, and sharecropping became the normal system of making a living from agriculture.
They aren't considered bad except by bigots & racists.
The families lived on sharecropping land