answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

slaves could inherit their masters property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not sure about the veracity of the above:-

In Africa and indeed across Europe in ancient times slaves were taken as part of conquest when one people attacked another and the ethnicity of the slaves (and masters) was varied. Anyone from any race could be a slave and anyone from any race could be a master. In America all slaves were black Africans and slavery became a racial issue - to justify (in their own minds) what they were doing the white slavers needed to regard the people they had enslaved as inherently inferior humans (because it would be wrong to enslave someone who was equal). This is what made the transatlantic slave trade different.

User Avatar

Nash Towne

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

Slavery in Africa was diverse, with slaves often integrating into society and having the ability to gain freedom. The transatlantic slave trade involved the brutal capture and transportation of Africans to the Americas to work on plantations. It was a more dehumanizing and systematic form of slavery, driven by European colonial powers.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

slaves could inherit their masters property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am not sure about the veracity of the above:-

In Africa and indeed across Europe in ancient times slaves were taken as part of conquest when one people attacked another and the ethnicity of the slaves (and masters) was varied. Anyone from any race could be a slave and anyone from any race could be a master. In America all slaves were black Africans and slavery became a racial issue - to justify (in their own minds) what they were doing the white slavers needed to regard the people they had enslaved as inherently inferior humans (because it would be wrong to enslave someone who was equal). This is what made the transatlantic slave trade different.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How was slavery that existed in Africa differ from the transatlantic slave trade?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Anthropology

What ways did the African slave system differ from the colonial slave system?

The African slave system typically involved slaves being integrated into society and having the potential to gain social mobility, while the colonial slave system focused on dehumanizing slaves and perpetuating generational enslavement. Additionally, the African slave system often relied on war captives or debtors, whereas the colonial slave system relied heavily on transatlantic slave trade.


What does each theory of multiregional and out of Africa say about the emergence of mankind?

The multiregional theory suggests that modern humans evolved from different pre-existing populations in multiple regions, with gene flow between them. In contrast, the Out of Africa theory proposes that modern humans originated in Africa and then dispersed to populate the rest of the world, with limited interbreeding with other hominid species. Both theories aim to explain the emergence of modern humans, but they differ in their emphasis on the geographical origin and movement of early human populations.


How do people in North Africa differ from people in the sub-Sahara?

People in North Africa tend to have a more Arab-Berber cultural influence due to historical interactions with the Arab world, while people in the sub-Sahara have more diverse ethnic backgrounds with various indigenous tribes. Additionally, North Africans mostly practice Islam, while the sub-Sahara has a mix of religions including Islam, Christianity, and traditional African religions. Geographically, North Africa is more connected to the Middle East and Mediterranean region, while the sub-Sahara is located south of the Sahara desert with different environmental and climatic conditions.


Africans and filipino difference?

Africans and Filipinos differ in terms of geography, culture, and physical characteristics. Africans are native to the continent of Africa, while Filipinos are from the Philippines in Southeast Asia. Africans typically have darker skin tones and distinct physical features, while Filipinos have a variety of ethnic backgrounds resulting in a wide range of physical appearances. Cultural differences also exist in terms of language, traditions, and beliefs between the two groups.


What are anthropogenic biomes and how do they differ from traditional biomes?

Anthropogenic biomes are landscapes that have been significantly altered by human activities, such as agriculture or urbanization. They differ from traditional biomes, which are natural ecosystems with distinct plant and animal communities that have evolved over time without much human interference. The concept of anthropogenic biomes highlights the impact of human activities on shaping the Earth's landscapes.

Related questions

How did slavery in west Africa differ from slavery practiced by European settlers?

because it was a different type of slavery.


How did the slave trade brought about be Europeans in Africa differ from preexisting forms of slavery in Africa and elsewhere?

Help! I need this qusetion answered by tomorrow for my history class!


How did the north and the south differ in their ideas about extending slavery?

the north didnt want slavery but the south want slavery


How did some abolitionists differ in their views toward African Americans?

The abolitionists differed in their views towards African Americans because some of them wanted to end slavery. Some of them wanted to continue slavery, and some of them wanted to send them back to Africa while others didn't.


How did the practice of slavery differ between classical civilizations?

it didnt


How do Jacobs' descriptions of slavery's abuses--and the pathways to freedom--differ from Douglass'?

Jacobs' descriptions of slavery's abuses was he was all for it. Douglass however was not into the slavery abuse.


How did northern and southern attitudes differ?

They chucked it Down to the slavery comprimise.


How did slavery in African and Muslim societies differ from slavery in the Americas?

Roman slaves were Greek, white, educated, they were captured by war, and could be trusted to be unsupervised. Pre Civil war slaves were Aperican American, not educated, captured in great numbers and treated poorly on the ships to America, raped, beaten, and often used as a type of pay.


How did west African slavery differ from the kind of slavery that developed in America?

one way that salvery is differ in the Americas than the west African would be the platiation , because we don't have a large plantation in America


How did Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas differ concerning the expansion of slavery?

They didn't


Why was slavery accepted in the colonies?

Slavery was accepted in the colonies primarily for economic reasons, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations and agricultural work. Additionally, there were existing racial prejudices that dehumanized African slaves and justified their enslavement in the eyes of many colonists. The legal and social structures of the time also supported and perpetuated the institution of slavery.


How did John Rutledge's and Gouverneur Morris' views of slavery differ?

they just were different