Answer 1
Conquest of territory by Muslims was not for personal glory or for conquering the will of people or for exploiting the country resources. Conquest territory by Muslims was to free the will of people and to end their oppression. Enforcement of people to convert to Islam was never adopted by Muslims because it is against Islam teaching where said in Quran "No compulsion in religion". This was not the case, for example, when Christians got control of Spain back from the hands of Muslims and was not the case when Rome ruler Constantine converted to Christianity and accordingly all his people followed him and converted too.
Spread of Islam was by free will of people irrelevant to conquest of territory by Muslims or not.
Refer to related question below for more information.
Answer 2
This is a very one-sided Muslim view. The conquests were a means of providing income for the large numbers of mainly Bedouin Arabs who had been forcible kept within Islam during the wars of the ridda immediately after Muhammad's death. He had already established a pattern of conquest and control, declaring that pagans could be offered Islam or death (plenty of compulsion). Early Islamic law (mainly dictated by Muhammad) decreed the levels of booty for the Arab armies and the poll tax imposed on Jews and Christians in return for their lives and property. Soon, the Arabs began to settle in the conquered territories and to develop as merchants, agriculturalists, administrators, and so on. Talking about 'freeing the will of people' (whatever that means) just confuses a simple historical narrative. There is no evidence that the Muslim armies were driven by altruistic motives
at all.
Islam did not spread the same way throughout all of Africa. In North Africa, Islam spread by conquest. In West Africa and along the Indian Ocean, Islam spread by contact between Muslim merchants and local Non-Muslims.
By physical conquest.
There was a temporary spread of Greek culture, however later conquest from Rome and Asian peoples reverse much of this.
If the Muslims weren't stopped at the Battle of Tours, Islam would have spread into Europe and Christianity would have been pushed out of Europe.
Islam was never spread by conquest. Refer to spain that was controlled by Muslims for hundreds of years. No Spanish was obliged to convert to Islam. People in Iraq converted tio Islam over hundreds of years at their own free will. In Egypt, you find many families part of them are Christians and other part are Muslims. Islam spread by traders through the familiarization of people with the good morals of Muslims and by the truthfulnes and logic of Islam religion. Refer to question below.The question "conquest or trade" is a false dichotomy. A more important factor than either was the social pressure to convert.What usually happened was that the Muslims conquered a place and imposed an Islamic political system. Individuals were not forced to become Muslims. But if they did not, they had to pay a heavy tax (the jizya) and suffered many social disadvantages: they were not allowed to make a public display of their original religion; they were not allowed to defend themselves if attacked by a Muslim; they had to give free hospitality to Muslim visitors; they even had to give up their seats in public places to a Muslim who wanted them. These disadvantages were so oppressive that in the end, the majority of people would convert to Islam voluntarily in order to acquire a better position in society.Some people also converted due to trade and other connections. They heard about Islam, liked the ideas and made a completely free conversion. But this was a comparatively small number. The assertion that people were "never" converted at sword-point is not correct. It did happen, though not as commonly as the social-pressure conversion.To return to the original question: Conquest was far more effective than trade in spreading Islam, but the path was from conquest to conversion was indirect.
spread ideas through trade, conquest, and expansion
Religious differences still divide Hindus and Muslims.
Greek, then Roman, and later Spanish, French and British.
By conquest.
Islam did not spread the same way throughout all of Africa. In North Africa, Islam spread by conquest. In West Africa and along the Indian Ocean, Islam spread by contact between Muslim merchants and local Non-Muslims.
Through Arab conquest.
It spread through simply trade and conquest.
people were curious, it spread art and architecture to different places
By conquest and settlement.
ISLAM
The conquest theory is a hypothesis proposed by researchers to explain the spread of Austronesian languages in the Pacific. It suggests that Austronesian-speaking people migrated and expanded through a series of maritime conquests, establishing dominance over indigenous populations. This theory has been used to account for the linguistic and cultural diversity found in the Pacific islands.
Conquest theory posits that imperialism is driven by the need to conquer and dominate other countries for economic, political, or strategic gain. It suggests that powerful nations seek to expand their territories and influence over weaker nations through force or coercion.