During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
Rome had an empire during both the republican and imperial periods. The Republic was ruled by popular assemblies - Centuriate, Tribal and Plebeian, with day-to-day action by the Consuls and Senate. The Empire was ruled by a coalition of Princeps/Emperor and the Senate, the assemblies gone. Also gone in the Empire were the tribunes of the plebs who had a veto in the Senate.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
During the republic form of government, the selecting of officials was in the hands of the people. During the form of government called the empire, the officials were appointed by the emperor, or, if voting were allowed, the emperor's man always won.
The Republic was power sharing between the senate and citizens. The Empire was power sharing between emperor and senate.
It had the Princeps Augustus sitting with reserve powers which could over-ride the Senate. The popular assemblies - Centuriate, Tribal and Plebeian were disposed of.
if you want to know get a life
it is sparta
Its leaders saw themselves as roman emperors, and theirand their government was in many ways a direct continuation of the eastern portion of the late roman empire
A republic is democratic while an empire is not. An empire has one leader in charge of all the laws while a republic may have one supreme leader but several other people (like a Congress or Parliament) to approve laws.
Yes, the empire of Charlemagne, also known as the Carolingian Empire, was considered a successor to the Western Roman Empire. Charlemagne was crowned as the Holy Roman Emperor by Pope Leo III in 800, which symbolized a continuity of imperial power in Western Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire. However, it is important to note that while Charlemagne's empire drew inspiration from the Roman Empire, it was a distinct political entity with its own institutions and culture.
One way that Diocletian tried to save the Roman Empire was by dividing the Empire into two halves, West and East.
It had already been different before. The Greeks retained their culture an language, and this had been developing of its own accord, though they did get Roman influences. They also had their own version of Christianity.
the roman republic was the first to think of checks and balances.
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.Two of the many ways that the Roman empire brought civilization to most of Europe were the rule of law and the use of permanent housing which evolved into towns.
Its leaders saw themselves as roman emperors, and theirand their government was in many ways a direct continuation of the eastern portion of the late roman empire
which political events lol
Please specify which development you are referring to.
in what way was Christianity a unifying force in the roman
it was different the wright wayy''' xD
A republic is democratic while an empire is not. An empire has one leader in charge of all the laws while a republic may have one supreme leader but several other people (like a Congress or Parliament) to approve laws.
Yes, the empire of Charlemagne, also known as the Carolingian Empire, was considered a successor to the Western Roman Empire. Charlemagne was crowned as the Holy Roman Emperor by Pope Leo III in 800, which symbolized a continuity of imperial power in Western Europe after the collapse of the Roman Empire. However, it is important to note that while Charlemagne's empire drew inspiration from the Roman Empire, it was a distinct political entity with its own institutions and culture.
The ancient Roman republic in general terms fits the description of a republic in the following ways: 1. A balance of power between the Senate and the Assembly is the center of what defines a republic; 2. Elections were held to fill important official positions; 3. The Roman republic had checks and balances through the election of consuls and Tribunes;and 4. Written laws created what is termed a government of laws not of men.
The quality and endurance of the Roman road complex served the unification of ancient Rome in several ways. The roadways were well protected with guard posts at various points along the road system. The allowed for commercial trade to flourish and be protected. Another vital way the roads helped to unite the ancient Roman republic and empire, was the fast and direct lines of that the well engineered roads for the transportation of Rome's legions. The Roman republic and empire was in a constant state of war during the life of Rome's existence. The roadways enabled the legions to march to border battle sites and to invade new territories.