Check out this quote from Wikipedia on the Missouri Compromise (which, I'm assuming is what you need more information on):
"Controversy over whether Missouri should be admitted as a slave state, resulted in the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which specified that Louisiana Purchase territory north of latitude 36° 30', which described Missouri's southern boundary, would be organized as free states and territory south of that line would be reserved for organization as slave states. As part of that compromise, the admission of Maine as a free state was secured to balance Missouri's admission as a slave state."
In 1820, the famous Missouri Compromise among American political leaders at the national level of government left most of the newly-acquired Louisiana Purchase territory free of slavery. In a bid to maintain balance among slave-holding and anti-slavery states, the Compromise allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave-holding state, with areas south of Missouri also granted slave-holding privileges. The vast remainder of the Louisiana Territory was designated as 'slavery-free.'
It allowed the territory of Missouri to join the USA as a slave-state.
No. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed slavery in those parts of the Louisiana Purchase that were South of the line. North of the line, it was illegal. This simple and sensible compromise kept the peace for thirty years.
Yes, but only those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
The addition of the Louisiana Purchase to the territory of the United States caused a surge in nationalism. It also allowed the nation to grow quickly west which also fueled the feeling.
The Missouri Compromise dealt with the expansion of slavery into the western territory (previously known as the Louisiana Territory).
In 1820, the famous Missouri Compromise among American political leaders at the national level of government left most of the newly-acquired Louisiana Purchase territory free of slavery. In a bid to maintain balance among slave-holding and anti-slavery states, the Compromise allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave-holding state, with areas south of Missouri also granted slave-holding privileges. The vast remainder of the Louisiana Territory was designated as 'slavery-free.'
It allowed the territory of Missouri to join the USA as a slave-state.
No. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 allowed slavery in those parts of the Louisiana Purchase that were South of the line. North of the line, it was illegal. This simple and sensible compromise kept the peace for thirty years.
i dont know you butthead
Yes, but only those territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803.
He was unsure if it was allowed by the constitution.
He was unsure if it was allowed by the constitution.
He was unsure if the purchase was allowed by the constitution.
He was unsure if the purchase was allowed by the constitution.
it says that slavery was not allowed there
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 temporarily settled the dispute over the westward expansion of slavery. It allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a slave state, Maine as a free state, and prohibited slavery north of the 36°30′ parallel in the Louisiana Territory.