0
Would not have become a world power
Dustin Marks
If Rome had been defeated at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC, it would have likely halted Rome's expansion into North Africa and prevented them from gaining control over Carthage. This defeat may have also weakened Rome's position in the Mediterranean and potentially altered the course of history, with other powers stepping in to fill the power vacuum left by Rome's loss.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was the battle of Zama a major turning point in history?
If Hannibal had been the victor, Carthage and not Rome would have become the greatest empire in the world. Because Rome was victorious, it was Rome that passed laws, its government, and its culture to Western civilization.
What war was the Battle of Zama?
The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.
Was Hannibal a threat to Rome?
Yes, he was. He was the Carthaginian general who attacked Italy from the north, crossing the Alps. It was a surprise attack as the Romans had never expected an attack from that direction. Hannibal led a 30,000 army, won several battles against the Roman army on his way to Rome, but he could not take Rome itself. In the end he was recalled to Africa and was defeated by Scipio at Zama in 202.
What would have hav happened if rome had been defeated at the battle of zama?
More war - Rome would not have given up on its ambitions as a world power. It would have had to keep on trying to defeat Carthage as they were irreconcilable enemies and contesting for dominance in the Western Mediterranean. One had to win eventually and eliminate the strength of the other.As it turned out, Carthage was defeated, and Rome sought to paralyse Carthage with a fifty-year financial penalty, which would have prevented them hiring their usual mercenary armies. Rome miscalculated - the Carthaginians were such successful traders that they paid off the indemnity within ten years and so, in Roman eyes, once again became a threat. Rome kept pushing the Carthaginians to war again by using North African proxies to attack them, so in due course an excuse came to attack Carthage once again and impose the final solution - levelling of the city and selling the people into slavery.
Rome becomes an empire?
The Battle of Zama
Why was the battle of Zama a major turning point in history?
If Hannibal had been the victor, Carthage and not Rome would have become the greatest empire in the world. Because Rome was victorious, it was Rome that passed laws, its government, and its culture to Western civilization.
What war was the Battle of Zama?
The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.The Roman general who won the battle of Zama was Publius Cornelius Scipio. For this victory he was awarded the honorific name Africanus by the senate. History refers to him as Scipio Africanus.
Who was been defeated in the battle of salamis?
Xerxes I of Persia was defeated in the naval battle of Salamis by Athenian admiral Themistocles .
Which group of events is the correct order etruscans control rome Romans with battle of zama Romans destroy Carthage roman republic established?
According to the fashionable theory the Etruscans conquered or dominated Rome 6th Century BCE, in the later period of the Roman monarchy. However, this is just that; a theory. It has been challenged. It is based on very flimsy evidence and on unproven assumptions. There is no historical record of this happening. The Roman Republic was established 509 BCE, which, according to the theory, occurred when the Etruscans were expelled from Rome. The battle of Zama was in 202 BCE. The Romans destroyed Carthage 146 BCE.
Was Hannibal a threat to Rome?
Yes, he was. He was the Carthaginian general who attacked Italy from the north, crossing the Alps. It was a surprise attack as the Romans had never expected an attack from that direction. Hannibal led a 30,000 army, won several battles against the Roman army on his way to Rome, but he could not take Rome itself. In the end he was recalled to Africa and was defeated by Scipio at Zama in 202.
What would have hav happened if rome had been defeated at the battle of zama?
More war - Rome would not have given up on its ambitions as a world power. It would have had to keep on trying to defeat Carthage as they were irreconcilable enemies and contesting for dominance in the Western Mediterranean. One had to win eventually and eliminate the strength of the other.As it turned out, Carthage was defeated, and Rome sought to paralyse Carthage with a fifty-year financial penalty, which would have prevented them hiring their usual mercenary armies. Rome miscalculated - the Carthaginians were such successful traders that they paid off the indemnity within ten years and so, in Roman eyes, once again became a threat. Rome kept pushing the Carthaginians to war again by using North African proxies to attack them, so in due course an excuse came to attack Carthage once again and impose the final solution - levelling of the city and selling the people into slavery.
The allies defeated german forces in this african battle?
During WW2 that would have been the 2nd Battle of El Alamein.
How would the Indian history be different had prithviraj expelled the ghorids from Punjab after the first battle of tarain?
in the next battle he had not been defeated
When was the last battle fought in Rome?
The last battle fought near the city of Rome was the Battle of Monte Cassino in the first half of 1944, to liberate Rome from Nazi and Fascist control during World War II. Since then, Italy has been rather peaceful.
Rome becomes an empire?
The Battle of Zama
What is the meaning of when the battles lost and won?
the battle might be won for Macbeth, however for his opponent they have been defeated.
What war came before the battle of new Orleans?
Jackson defeated the British at the Battle of New Orleans after the War of 1812 had been officially concluded.
