Well, assuming the president is still alive he/she would make a public address, blame it on Al Queda, and proceed to attack a small country with oil and/or other valuable resources for dubious reasons while hailing themselves as heroes. Any first world nation who disagrees with this will be insulted and ridiculed in rather pathetic ways that they dont care about. (IE freedom fries) Any second or third world nation who disagrees will be accused of either sympathizing with the fictional terrorists from this nation or aiding and abiding them.
AnswerI see we have a member of "Blame America First" here. Gee, if we could only figure out what we have done to make them mad at us we could all be happy. If a dirty bomb is detonated in the US, perhaps some of these people will finally realize that there is a WAR and we are the target of fanatical hatred that is NOT our fault.
Sad thing is the powers that be sitting in Washington adjusting their 10 gal hats know why we are often targeted, Uncle Sam butts his head into too many others affairs. We create and manufacture dictators, who become de facto terrorist or believed to harbor them, when it is convenient to the government, and then when their usefulness is done they are discarded or overthrown, on trumped up charges.
If a dirty bomb or any other significant attack happened on American soil the is think would be vengeance, payback, and it don't matter who so long as they had no military that could come near to equaling Uncle Sam's. If Chinese nationals who were not acting on behalf of China carried out the attack the US would not give them the Taliban treatment. They would not say "find them and hand them over or you will not be in charge next year" Uncle Sam would pretty much just suck it up because they will not bomb China. If it were Chavez's nationals from Venezuela it would be a totally different story. He, Chavez, would not have to know members from his nation carried it out; he would be vilifies here and attacked. Good old American foreign policy hypocrisy.
In the US, the highest ranking government official in the states are their governors.
There is no "official" religion in the United States where religion must be separated from government pursuant the the United States Constitution.There is no "official" religion in the United States where religion must be separated from government pursuant the the United States Constitution.There is no "official" religion in the United States where religion must be separated from government pursuant the the United States Constitution.There is no "official" religion in the United States where religion must be separated from government pursuant the the United States Constitution.
Blanket
No governmental entity in the United States has a religious attribute. It is against the Constitution of the United States and if a government were to adopt an official religion it would become an illegal government.
The President of the United States, for one.
lieutenant governor
Blanket
Blanket
The top executive official of any state government in the United States is the governor. State governments are set up fairly similar to the federal government. They have legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The president is the top executive in the United States while the governor is the top executive of a state government.
The United States does not have an official language. The primary language of government and business is English, but it has no official status in law and other languages are required to be used when needed to ensure the understanding of people involved in legal and government proceedings.
The Vice President of The United States of America.
The United States of America has not designated an official language. The English language is the primary language of business and government but it has no special legal status and the government is expected to communicate to residents in whatever language they can understand.