The neutral atom of calcium has 20 electrons; the cation Ca2+ has 18 electrons.
Argon
Nitrogen would have a neutral charge and eight valence electrons.
Tungsten has 74 protons. With 68 electrons, it would have a charge of +6.
It becomes a calcium cation - Ca2+
it would have a net negative charge.
A Calcium ion with a -1 net charge would have 21 electrons. Calcium as a stable element has 20 electrons.
Technically, any atom could have 40 electrons, but it would have a very weird charge. However, Zirconium has 40 electrons without being an ion.
Well the charge on the compound would be stable (0) when bonded, because the Calcium has given it's electrons to the Oxygen atom. But the charge on the calcium ion itself would be 2+
Ca has 2 electrons in its valence shell. When ionized, it transfers its 2 extra electrons to another atom in order to stabalize its outer shell. Therefore, it is losing 2 negatively charged particles and gains a charge of "2+".
2+
Well the charge on the compound would be stable (0) when bonded, because the Calcium has given it's electrons to the Oxygen atom. But the charge on the calcium ion itself would be 2+
Ca must lose 2 electrons to have a complete 3n shell, which has 8 valence electrons. The ion would have a charge of 2+: Ca^2+.
Ca (2+) I think because since there are two less electrons then the charge would become positive.
Calcium has twenty electrons in each atom.
calcium loses two electrons, becoming a +2 ion
SO4 2-
Well if you look at your periodic table you will notice that calcium is the element with the atomic number of 20. Since calcium is a group 2A metal, it seeks to lose 2 electrons which means that a stable ion of calcium would have a charge of 2+ since it has lost 2 electrons with negative charges. This situation will occur if you dissolve CaCl (calcium chloride) into water, where the compound would break up into its constituent ions, which would be Ca^2+ and Cl^2-