It really depends on where they hit you and if you were moving. For example if you are stopped in the left hand lane waiting to turn (legally) and a car hits you, it is their fault. However if you are somewhere you are not supposed to be and they hit you, it is your fault for being there. It all comes down to the right of way and who has it.
Yes, it probably would. If you changed lanes and you bump in to someone in front of you, you were not looking. The same for if you bumped into someone behind you.
well you would be at fault for changing lanes into then, and they would be at fault for not having a licences
Generally, the person that was changing lanes would be at fault. It would be hard to find fault in the other driver if they were stationary in their lane.
Traffic lanes are narrower on the north east coast because they were constructed in to be that way.
London Bridge has three lanes of traffic in each direction. From the north bank to the south bank there are three lanes of traffic for all vehicles. From the south to the north, there are two lanes of traffic for all vehicles plus one bus lane.
The Sydney Harbour Bridge carries eight lanes of vehicular traffic. There are also two train lines, a pedestrian footpath and a cycleway. The width of the bridge is almost 49 metres.
No, it is not an adverb. Traffic is a noun, which can also be used as an adjunct or adjective (traffic laws, traffic lanes).
The driver of the vehicle that swerved into your lane would be charged with "Changing Lanes Without Caution."
Changing lanes across that a solid white line in traffic is not permitted.
Need at least 4-second gap in traffic
blocked lanes
merging