0
In 494 b.c Plebeian dissatisfaction with the patricians led them to?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
i fcked everybody in earths mom sorry
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What year did Rome plebeians rebel leading to the creation of the republic?
The Republic was created in 509 BC. It was not the result of a plebeian rebellion. Many historians think that the rebellion was led by the patricians. The first plebeian rebellion occurred later, in 494 BC.
How Much Power Did Plebians Have?
The plebeians had their own assembly, the Plebeian Council, and elected their representatives, the plebeian tribunes. These tribunes could present bills to the vote of this council and could veto the actions of the officer of state. Thus, the power of the plebeians depended of how far the plebeian tribunes would promote their interest. At times when there were very militant plebeian tribunes, this led to clashed with the patricians (the aristocracy).
What event led to the creation of tribunes?
If you mean the military tribunes, they were created right at the beginning of the creation of the Roman army by Romulus, the founder of the city and its first king. If you mean the plebeians tribunes, they were created during the first rebellion of the poor plebeians: the First Plebeian Secession (494 BC). The plebeian movement created its leaders (the plebeians tribunes) and their assistants (the plebeian aediles) and the assembly of the movement, the plebeian council (concilium plebis).
What was the political and social standing of the patricians and plebeians and how was the struggle between the orders resolved?
The patricians were the aristocracy and the wealthiest group. The term plebeian had to meanings. One referred to the poor. The other referred to rich non-patricians. The conflict was driven by the grievances of the poor, which led to the formation of the plebeian movement: the use of arbitrary power by consuls on the poor, the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors, debt bondage and land reform (the poor did not have enough land). The conflict was resolved by addressing aspects of arbitrary power and by the gradual giving access to the offices of state (which were the preserve of the patricians) to the rich plebeians who were the leaders of the plebeian movement. These leaders became part of what has been called the patrician-plebeian oligarchy, which came to control the mid-republic. This led to the end of the plebeian movement. The economic situation of the poor temporarily relieved as slavery replaced debt bondage and land was given to poor people who were sent to Latin colonies (settlements) established around Italy with Rome's expansion into Italy. However, later poverty became a big issue again and could make Roman politics explosive.
Why did they force the patricians to give plebeians the rights they demanded?
The plebeians had an organised movement. Plebeian agitations were a constant feature in the Early Republic. The plebeian movement originally created a state within the state. They seceded in 494 BC. They left Rome en masse and threatened to establish a new city to the northwest of Rome. They did so out of disaffection with the patrician-controlled Roman state which had failed to respond to their demands for protection against the abuse of defaulting debtors by creditors who imprisoned them, tortured them and sometimes even sold them as slaves. The secession also gave more effectiveness to the plebeian's main weapon in the early days: the refusal to join the army. This was a serious matter because at that time Rome was under constant attack by three of its neighbouring peoples. The plebeians created their leaders, the plebeian tribunes, and assembly, the plebeian council. When they returned to Rome, they turned the Aventine Hill into a something like a separate state. Here they made their own decisions independently from the consuls and senate. In the early days direct action was what gave the plebeians bargaining power. Over time, more and more concessions were made. It has to be noted that there were differences in the interests of the rich plebeians who led the plebeian movement and the poor plebeians. The rich plebeians wanted access to the offices of state which were the preserve of the patricians. The poor plebeians had economic grievances. The rich plebeian leaders won their struggle with the help of liberal patricians who supported reform. The rich plebeians were co-opted into the establishment. This led to the creation of a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor plebeians. The economic grievances of the poor plebeians were not addressed properly.
What year did Rome plebeians rebel leading to the creation of the republic?
The Republic was created in 509 BC. It was not the result of a plebeian rebellion. Many historians think that the rebellion was led by the patricians. The first plebeian rebellion occurred later, in 494 BC.
How Much Power Did Plebians Have?
The plebeians had their own assembly, the Plebeian Council, and elected their representatives, the plebeian tribunes. These tribunes could present bills to the vote of this council and could veto the actions of the officer of state. Thus, the power of the plebeians depended of how far the plebeian tribunes would promote their interest. At times when there were very militant plebeian tribunes, this led to clashed with the patricians (the aristocracy).
What was the goal of the plebeians in demanding the Law of the Twelve Tables?
The goal of the plebeian was to have clear, written, and published laws. Prior to the Law of the Twelve Tablets, Rome did not have a written code of law. Laws had been religious rules which were kept secret by the priests (who were patricians) and the proceedings of the senate were not published. In particular, the plebeians wanted protections against the abuse of defaulting debtors by creditors (who were patricians) who imprisoned them, tortured them and sometimes sold them as slaves. This was the issue which had led to the first plebeian rebellion 44 years earlier (in 494 BC), the creation of the plebeian movement and the beginning of the Conflict of the Orders (between patricians and plebeians). Some of the provisions of the law law established procedures for the conduct of the trials of defaulting debtors which provided a degree of protection. It also clarified the rules for the arrest of citizens. In those days there was not a police force and citizens were arrested by other citizens.
What event led to the creation of tribunes?
If you mean the military tribunes, they were created right at the beginning of the creation of the Roman army by Romulus, the founder of the city and its first king. If you mean the plebeians tribunes, they were created during the first rebellion of the poor plebeians: the First Plebeian Secession (494 BC). The plebeian movement created its leaders (the plebeians tribunes) and their assistants (the plebeian aediles) and the assembly of the movement, the plebeian council (concilium plebis).
What Led to the conflict of the Orders?
Patricians were allowed to stand for election to political office, but over time these laws were revoked, and eventually all offices were opened to the Plebeians. Since most individuals who were elected to political office were given membership in the Roman Senate, this development helped to transform the senate from a body of Patricians into a body of Plebeian and Patrician aristocrats. This development occurred at the same time that the Plebeian legislative assembly, the Plebeian Council, was acquiring additional power. At first, its acts ("plebiscites") applied only to Plebeians, although after 449 BC, these acts began to apply to both Plebeians and Patricians. It wasn't until 287 BC, however, that the Patrician senators lost their last check over the Plebeian Council. However, the Patricio-Plebeian aristocracy in the senate still retained other means by which to control the Plebeian Council, in particular the closeness between the Plebeian Tribunes and the senators. While this conflict would end in 287 BC with the Plebeians having acquired political equality with the Patricians, the plight of the average Plebeian had not changed. A small number of aristocratic Plebeian families had emerged, and most Plebeian politicians came from one of these families. answer from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_the_Orders Patricians were allowed to stand for election to political office, but over time these laws were revoked, and eventually all offices were opened to the Plebeians. Since most individuals who were elected to political office were given membership in the Roman Senate, this development helped to transform the senate from a body of Patricians into a body of Plebeian and Patrician aristocrats. This development occurred at the same time that the Plebeian legislative assembly, the Plebeian Council, was acquiring additional power. At first, its acts ("plebiscites") applied only to Plebeians, although after 449 BC, these acts began to apply to both Plebeians and Patricians. It wasn't until 287 BC, however, that the Patrician senators lost their last check over the Plebeian Council. However, the Patricio-Plebeian aristocracy in the senate still retained other means by which to control the Plebeian Council, in particular the closeness between the Plebeian Tribunes and the senators. While this conflict would end in 287 BC with the Plebeians having acquired political equality with the Patricians, the plight of the average Plebeian had not changed. A small number of aristocratic Plebeian families had emerged, and most Plebeian politicians came from one of these families. answer from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_the_Orders
What was the political and social standing of the patricians and plebeians and how was the struggle between the orders resolved?
The patricians were the aristocracy and the wealthiest group. The term plebeian had to meanings. One referred to the poor. The other referred to rich non-patricians. The conflict was driven by the grievances of the poor, which led to the formation of the plebeian movement: the use of arbitrary power by consuls on the poor, the abuse of debt defaulters by creditors, debt bondage and land reform (the poor did not have enough land). The conflict was resolved by addressing aspects of arbitrary power and by the gradual giving access to the offices of state (which were the preserve of the patricians) to the rich plebeians who were the leaders of the plebeian movement. These leaders became part of what has been called the patrician-plebeian oligarchy, which came to control the mid-republic. This led to the end of the plebeian movement. The economic situation of the poor temporarily relieved as slavery replaced debt bondage and land was given to poor people who were sent to Latin colonies (settlements) established around Italy with Rome's expansion into Italy. However, later poverty became a big issue again and could make Roman politics explosive.
Who represented the lower class citizens of rome?
The tribunes of the plebs, or plebeian tribunes, represented the poor plebeians who were the lower class. They were created by the plebeian movement, a movement of poor plebeians, during the first plebeian rebellion (the First Plebeian Secession of 494 BC) which started the Conflict of the orders, a conflict between patricians and plebeians. The plebeian tribunes were given the power to veto actions they deemed to be against the interests of the plebeians. They were given scacrosancticity (inviolability). In Roman customs those who armed a sacrosanct person could be killed without punishment. Effectively, this was a lynch law. The tribunes were made sacrosanct because the poor plebeians vowed to kill anyone who harmed them. As leaders of the plebeian movement, the plebeian tribunes initiated agitations to advance demands related to the economic plight and grievances of the poor. However, these issues were never addressed properly. Moreover, the plebeian tribunes were rich plebeians and they used the movement to obtain power- sharing with the patricians. Once they obtained this and were co-opted into the oligarchy, they turned the back on the poor. This was towards the end on the Early Republic. During the Late Republic a new breed of politicians who supported the plight of the poor emerged as plebeian tribunes. The most famous of these were the Gracchi brothers who rekindled the original militant spirit of the plebeian movement and led plebeian agitations to force the introduction of a land reform aimed at giving land to the poor.
when Which document settled the tensions between the patricians and plebeians was called?
The Lex Hortensia of 284 BC is seen by historians as being the measure which ended the 200-year long Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians. The law was the last of a series of laws and measures which opened up access to power for the rich plebeians who led the plebeian movement and wanted power-sharing with the patricians and gave more legislative clout the plebeian council, the assembly of the plebeians. It did so by removing the requirement that bills proposed by the plebeian tribunes (the leaders of the plebeian movement) for the vote by the plebeian council had to be ratified by the patrician-dominated senate before the vote, thus eliminating restrictions on plebeian-led legislation. The laws which improved plebeian access to power and plebeian legislation-making were: · The Lex Varleia Horatia de plebiscites (449 BC) established that bills passed by plebiscites (the resolutions of the plebeian council) carried the force of law and were binding on all roman citizens (including the patricians) but the bills had to be to be ratified by the senate prior to the vote. · Lex Cannuleia de connubio (448 BC) allowed marriage between patricians and plebeians which had been forbidden by table 11.1 of the Law of the Twelve Tables. · The Lex Licinia Sextia (367 BC) opened the office of the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the city and the army) to the plebeians. · The Lex Publilia (339 BC) also established that the laws passed in the plebiscites carried the force of law and were binding on all Roman citizens (including the patricians) like the Lex Valeria Horatia did (see above). · The Lex Genucia (342 BC) allowed for both consuls to be plebeian. However, the practice was to have one patrician and one plebeian each year. · The Lex Olgunia (300 BC) opened the priesthoods to the plebeians. · The lex Hortensia (284 BC) established that the bills passed in the plebiscites carried the force of law and were binding on all Roman citizens (including the patricians) and that the bills were not to be ratified by the senate before the vote. Other milestones for the rich plebeians were 356 BC, which saw the first plebeian dictator (an extraordinary officer of state appointed at times of emergency) 351 BC, which saw the first plebeian censor (the third highest office of state), and 337 which saw the first plebeian praetor (the second highest office of state).
Why did they force the patricians to give plebeians the rights they demanded?
The plebeians had an organised movement. Plebeian agitations were a constant feature in the Early Republic. The plebeian movement originally created a state within the state. They seceded in 494 BC. They left Rome en masse and threatened to establish a new city to the northwest of Rome. They did so out of disaffection with the patrician-controlled Roman state which had failed to respond to their demands for protection against the abuse of defaulting debtors by creditors who imprisoned them, tortured them and sometimes even sold them as slaves. The secession also gave more effectiveness to the plebeian's main weapon in the early days: the refusal to join the army. This was a serious matter because at that time Rome was under constant attack by three of its neighbouring peoples. The plebeians created their leaders, the plebeian tribunes, and assembly, the plebeian council. When they returned to Rome, they turned the Aventine Hill into a something like a separate state. Here they made their own decisions independently from the consuls and senate. In the early days direct action was what gave the plebeians bargaining power. Over time, more and more concessions were made. It has to be noted that there were differences in the interests of the rich plebeians who led the plebeian movement and the poor plebeians. The rich plebeians wanted access to the offices of state which were the preserve of the patricians. The poor plebeians had economic grievances. The rich plebeian leaders won their struggle with the help of liberal patricians who supported reform. The rich plebeians were co-opted into the establishment. This led to the creation of a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. At this point the rich plebeians turned their backs on the poor plebeians. The economic grievances of the poor plebeians were not addressed properly.
Why can't patricians and plebeians marrry?
The twelfth law of the law of the Twelve Tables of 449 BC forbade this kind of intermarriage. However, this caused an outcry and soon after, in 445 BC, the Lex Canuleia allowed this intermarriage again. It is not clear why this prohibition was introduced because the second decemvirate (committee of ten men) which issued the eleventh and twelfth tables, was said to have had plebeian members. That at least some patricians might have desired to form a closed shop in the face of the rise of the political aspirations of the plebeian rich, who led the plebeian movement and wanted the Roman state to be reformed, could be understandable. The reforms were seen as a threat patrician privilege. However: 1) the endorsement of the prohibition by the plebeian decemviri seems a contradiction as it curtailed plebeian rights and has not been explained by ancient historians 2) it is not clear why this should have been legislated. Maybe conservative patricians were concerned about liberal patricians who were open to the inclusion of rich plebeians into the elite. Intermarriage could be a channel for this and may have been something that had to be stopped. Still, reconstructions can only be based on speculation and these events are unclear.
What effect did the conflict of orders have on the early Roman Republic?
The conflict of the Orders saw the creation of the Plebeian Council, where the plebeians could discuss their issues and make their own resolutions, and of the plebeian tribunes, their representatives. These were institutions which existed in parallel and separately from the other Roman institutions: the senate and the other two popular assemblies, the Assembly of the Soldiers and the Assembly of the Tribes. The conflict also led to power sharing between patricians and rich plebeian. Originally the patricians monopolised political power. The rich plebeians gained access to the offices of state and the senate. In the Late republic, when the issue of poverty became a political hot potato, there were times when the plebeian tribunes clashed over the issue of reforms to help the poor.
What were the social classes of Ancient Rome called?
Social classes in Rome were called orders. The patricians were the aristocracy. The plebeians were the commoners (all non-patricians, both rich and poor). In the Early Republic, the plebeians fought the patricians in the 200-year conflict of the Orders. The poor plebeians fought for their economic grievances. The rich plebeians, who led the plebeian movement, also fought for power sharing with the patricians, who monopolised it. Eventually, the rich plebeians obtained power sharing and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. These rich plebeians were given equite (cavalryman) status. The equites were the second highest ranking order in Roman society. At this point the rich plebeians turned the back on the poor, whose economic issues were never addressed properly and remained plebeians.
