dude i have no idea.
It tells how its unfair and wrong nobody should have to be told what to do and have to do it , the right way as if there life depended on it because then it did.
Things are crossed out because certain things in the constitution are now unconstitutional. For instance the area that speaks about slaves being 3/5ths of a person.
When determining representation by population, slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a person.
3 parts of constitution
Nothing, it made them 3/4 of a person.
A slave was 3/4 of a person in the constitution when population was counted for the house.
1. constitution of liberty 2. constitution of government 3. constitution of sovereignty
The Constitution ignored native Americans; women and partially slaves because of the 3/5 provisions.
3/5 of the population of slaves were counted for each state
No, it began because the norths (anti-slavery) wanted the constitution to say no slavery, while the south (pro-slavery) wanted the constitution to say yes to slavery. What ended happening is that the constitution said states with over a certain amount of people could have slaves. The next question would be whether or not slaves were considered people or citizens of the United States. The 3/5s act came into play, saying that for every 5 slaves in the state, 3 would be counted as a person.
The Fugitive Slave Clause is found in Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3 of the U.S. Constitution. This clause was mostly rendered moot by the passage of the 14th Amendment.
The biggest issue which was dodged in the Constitution was the matter of Slavery. The 3/5ths rule (as found in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3) is the compromise between the Northern states (who did not have slaves) and the Southern ones (which did). It gave the Southern states some benefit from slaves for the purpose of Representation in Congress (and apportionment of revenue), while avoiding handing them an overwhelming edge.