0
Yes, social stratification can contribute to unequal development by creating barriers to accessing resources and opportunities based on factors like income, education, and social status. This can result in disparities in areas such as wealth, health, and education levels among different social groups, leading to uneven development outcomes.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the disadvantages of development theories?
Some disadvantages of development theories include their tendency to oversimplify complex issues, their Eurocentric bias, and their failure to adequately consider cultural, historical, and social contexts in different regions. Additionally, development theories may prioritize economic growth over social and environmental concerns, leading to unsustainable practices and unequal distribution of resources.
What do you understand by social indicators of development?
Social indicators of development are measures that assess the well-being and quality of life of a society, such as education levels, healthcare access, poverty rates, and social equality. They help to gauge the progress and impact of development efforts on a population's social welfare and overall prosperity. These indicators provide a more holistic perspective on development beyond just economic growth.
What is social stratifications?
(Apex Learning) Ranking people based on factors such as gender, wealth, and occupation.
How does social development relate to holistic development?
Social development is a key aspect of holistic development as it pertains to an individual's ability to interact with others, form relationships, and navigate social situations effectively. Holistic development encompasses overall growth in all aspects of an individual, including physical, cognitive, emotional, and social dimensions. By focusing on social development, individuals can enhance their interpersonal skills, emotional intelligence, and overall well-being, contributing to a more comprehensive and balanced growth.
How are social physical psychological and cognitive areas of development linked?
The social, physical, psychological, and cognitive areas of development are interconnected and influence each other. For example, physical development can impact psychological development, which in turn affects social behavior. Cognitive development enables individuals to understand and navigate social interactions, while social experiences can stimulate cognitive growth. Overall, growth and changes in one area of development can affect and be affected by growth in other areas.
What view reflects social-conflict theorists' ideas about social stratification?
Social inequality reflects the social-conflict theorists ideas about social stratification.
Which of these lists accurately describes the sequence of events leading up to a chiefdom?
Job specialization, then development of agriculture, then social stratification
What is social stratification in conflict theory?
Social Stratification in Conflict Thеory In conflict thеory, social stratification is viеwеd as a systеm that pеrpеtuatеs inеqualitiеs and sеrvеs thе intеrеsts of individuals and groups who havе thе powеr to dominatе and еxploit othеrs.Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs. This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification. In conflict thеory, social stratification is viеwеd as a systеm that pеrpеtuatеs inеqualitiеs and sеrvеs thе intеrеsts of individuals and groups who havе thе powеr to dominatе and еxploit othеrs [𝟏] [𝟐]. Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs [𝟑]. This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification [𝟒]. Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs [𝟑]. This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification [𝟒].Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs [𝟑]. This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification [𝟒]. Conflict thеorists sее social stratification as a rеsult of thе strugglе for powеr and rеsourcеs, with thе dominant groups using thеir influеncе to maintain and rеinforcе thеir privilеgеd positions in sociеty. This pеrspеctivе highlights thе rolе of social class in shaping and pеrpеtuating inеqualitiеs within thе social structurе. In summary, conflict thеory viеws social stratification as a mеchanism that pеrpеtuatеs inеqualitiеs and bеnеfits thosе who havе thе powеr to dominatе and еxploit othеrs within sociеty. It еmphasizеs thе rolе of compеtition for rеsourcеs and powеr in shaping thе hiеrarchical structurе of sociеty. Social Stratification in Conflict Thеory In conflict thеory, social stratification is viеwеd as a systеm that pеrpеtuatеs inеqualitiеs and sеrvеs thе intеrеsts of individuals and groups who havе thе powеr to dominatе and еxploit othеrs. Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs . This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification. Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs . This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification [. nd incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification .Conflict thеorists еmphasizе thе rolе of compеtition among diffеrеnt groups within sociеty ovеr limitеd rеsourcеs, lеading to thе crеation and pеrpеtuation of social inеqualitiеs . This pеrspеctivе draws on Karl Marx's viеw of class sociеtiеs and incorporatеs a critiquе of thе functionalist pеrspеctivе on social stratification. Conflict thеorists sее social stratification as a rеsult of thе strugglе for powеr and rеsourcеs, with thе dominant groups using thеir influеncе to maintain and rеinforcе thеir privilеgеd positions in sociеty.This pеrspеctivе highlights thе rolе of social class in shaping and pеrpеtuating inеqualitiеs within thе social structurе. In summary, conflict thеory viеws social stratification as a mеchanism that pеrpеtuatеs inеqualitiеs and bеnеfits thosе who havе thе powеr to dominatе and еxploit othеrs within sociеty. It еmphasizеs thе rolе of compеtition for rеsourcеs and powеr in shaping thе hiеrarchical structurе of sociеty.
What describes a way in which the specialization of jobs and development of social stratification in early societies were similar?
Both the specialization of jobs and development of social stratification in early societies led to the division of labor and unequal distribution of resources among individuals based on their roles or status. This created hierarchies within the society where certain groups had more power, wealth, or prestige than others.
What are the differences between inequality and stratification?
Social Inequality: Condition whereby people have unequal access to valued resources, services, and positions in society.Social Stratification: Inequality has been institutionalized, and there is a system of social relationships that determines who gets what, and why.
What according to Melvin tum in what is the result of social stratification?
According to Melvin Tumin, the result of social stratification is the exclusion of certain groups from accessing resources and opportunities, leading to unequal distribution of wealth, power, and status in society. This can perpetuate inequalities and limit social mobility for those at the lower levels of the social hierarchy.
Why is stratification unavoidable?
Stratification is unavoidable because societies naturally organize themselves based on factors such as wealth, power, and social status. This leads to the creation of hierarchies and inequalities that become entrenched over time. Additionally, human nature tends to lead to competition and unequal distribution of resources, further reinforcing social stratification.
What are the implications of global stratification?
Global stratification leads to unequal distribution of resources, opportunities, and power among countries, which can perpetuate poverty, inequality, and social injustice. It reinforces a cycle where wealthier nations continue to dominate and exploit poorer nations, hindering social and economic development on a global scale. Addressing global stratification requires concerted efforts to promote equity, solidarity, and sustainable development across nations.
What are the determinant of social stratification?
The key determinants of social stratification are economic, social and political policies.
Which theory of stratification views unequal social rewards as necessary for the stability of the system?
According to functionalist theory, unequal social rewards are necessary to encourage individuals to take on different roles in society based on their abilities and contributions. This helps ensure that essential tasks are carried out efficiently, promoting social stability.
What are causes of social stratification in Ghana?
Social stratification in Ghana is influenced by factors such as historical inequalities stemming from colonization, unequal distribution of wealth and resources, ethnic diversity and identity leading to tensions, as well as educational and occupational opportunities that are not equally accessible to all members of society. These factors contribute to the formation and perpetuation of social classes and hierarchies in Ghana.
Fill in the blank in the timeline was followed by job specialization then by social stratification and finally by chiefdoms.?
The development of agriculture.
