Cutting down trees isn't inherently bad. As long as you don't cut down too many trees in one place, and replant trees it's fine. It's only when you do massive, destructive clear-cutting type deforestation (like in the Amazon) that there's any real impact.
Without materials for building things the only thing for us is hunting and gathering and that just won't work.
It is necessary for modern society and it won't stop, but it's the least of our worries. It is quite possible to be ecologically friendly.
Recycling & sustainable development
deforestation
Deforestation
Cleavage itself is not necessary during development - it is a result of development, specifically of mammary gland development during puberty in humans. Mammary gland development is important because the mammary gland provides 100% of a newborn's nutrition up to 24 months after birth.
Yes but a natural deforestation Not a very threatening deal. Just life
deforestation
deforestation is a great contributer to global warming
deforestation it self does not help the country but ya after deforestation the land can be used for a variety of things like development of house or any factories or anything else which in turn will help the coutry
Building homes.
Building homes.
Recycling & sustainable development
Frontier deforestation is forest destruction that occurs along a discernible frontier, such as a new road cut into a forest. Mosaic deforestation, in contrast, occurs in patches across a forested area. However, in many areas deforestation can exhibit both frontier and mosaic patterns of development.
A major reason for deforestation and land development is the building of businesses and housing to increase size of area. Jobs are created this way as well.
Deforestation
gopvernment policy, population growth, infrastructure development, unemplymnet
Amazon Rainforest deforestation and urban poverty increased
No.