0
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYour question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who had the smallest number of people in a roman army?
The smallest Roman army unit was the contuberium, which was an eight man tent unit.
Did Rome's army have the strength and man power to protect such a huge empire?
Since the Roman Empire lasted for a thousand years, I infer that yes, the Roman army did have the power to protect it.
Why roman army used coarse wollen tunic?
The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.
How old did you have to be to join the ancient Roman army?
Retirement from the Roman army was not a matter of age, it was a matter of service. When a man's enlistment time was up he could either reenlist or retire. There was no actual age limit for reenlistment either. There is a record of a centurion who had retired, missed the army so much that he reenlisted and was still serving at the age of 80!
Why was Diocletian called Augustus during his rule of the eastern territory of the Roman Empire?
Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.Augustus was a title of Roman emperors which was added to the man's name.
What examination had to be past to be in the roman army?
To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.To be accepted i the Roman army as man had to be freeborn and physically and mentally sound.
Is a gay man allowed in a woman's bathroom?
No. Generally speaking, no man is allowed in a woman's toilet.
Who had the smallest number of people in a roman army?
The smallest Roman army unit was the contuberium, which was an eight man tent unit.
What did you have to be like to get in to the roman army?
To be accepted into the Roman army a man had to be a citizen. He had to be mentally and physically sound and they liked them to be about six Roman feet tall. The height requirement was a preference, not mandatory.
Did Rome's army have the strength and man power to protect such a huge empire?
Since the Roman Empire lasted for a thousand years, I infer that yes, the Roman army did have the power to protect it.
Why roman army used coarse wollen tunic?
The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.The Roman army had the coarser grade of wool for their tunics because they were cheaper to purchase. If a man chose, he could get a better grade, but would have to pay a higher price for it. Remember that the Roman soldier had to pay for his clothing even though the army supplied it.
Why were women not allowed to fight in the roman army?
No, but there were women with the Roman Army. Officers, centurions, and some soldiers were allowed to marry, and there were also women who stayed in the army camps and followed them on the march.... for various reasons.
Is gay allowed in the roman army?
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Would a Roman Catholic man be allowed to marry his widow's sister?
There are no laws preventing it. However, it is an impossibility since the man is dead.
What is a gladius used for in roman times?
The Gladius Hispaniensis was the short sword which was used by the Roman army. Its short size and light weight made it suitable for close, man-to-man infantry combat.
Did a Roman Emperor get married to a man?
Yes, there was a gay marriage between a Roman emperor and another man.Emperor Nero apparently married one of his Freedmen (a man freed from slavery). Nero supposedly took the role of the bride.
Why does a gay man fall in love with a man?
Because he is a gay man
