Human cloning is a controversial venture and it is unlikely that it will ever be totally accepted in society.
If humans were cloned, most people would probably agree that they should be treated the same as any other human. Afterall, they can't control the way they are born, just like you or me cannot control our skin color or gender.
However, I have discussed the topic with different Demographics of people to find some mixed responses. Some in the religious community say they would not let a clone into their house of worship since their god did not create them. Others say that they should be viewed as property.
However, since the world of human cloning seems to be a far off prospect now, this question will probably remain open for discussion.
I have more to add to the section above, i believe that the people with religion, are wrong, because, since god created you, and you make the clone, then therefore, god made the clone.
This is a ridiculous question. Why wouldn't they have rights and why wouldn't they have the same rights as everyone else? Just because the human didn't come from sex doesn't mean they are not human. Anyone who disagrees is superstitious and unintelligent. This will be the next form of slavery/racism. Even dogs have rights. A human is a human.
It's my personal opinion that cloning a human is not ethical since in every religion,mankind is projected as the creation of God. So, this sort of juggling over God's creation by Medical Science can not be supported and will tatter the social fabric into pieces.
yes yes
yes and no
There are no federal laws completely banning human cloning in the United States. There are regulations against using federal funds for cloning research. A United Nations declaration was adopted, calling for the worldwide ban of human cloning.
The controversy surrounding human cloning is an ethical issue. People wonder if humans have the right to create other humans and if humans do have that right, do they also have the right to take life away? The controversy is over life and death and who has the power to control them.
No human has yet been cloned. With the exception of identical twins.
thee down falls of cloning are the dark parts of a clone....a clone of a dog or human may be bad...misfitted...or mis-shaped
Natural Law Theory
In Australia, it is illegal to clone a human being. It is also illegal to clone a human being in the United States.
There have been many attempts to clone a human being but all have failed. No, there has not been a human clone created till this day.
Human nature ethics is a form of ethical theory that relies on examining human nature in order to come to ethical conclusions. Often human nature ethical theorists base their ethics on biological drives.
Yes, if enough DNA was attained, then a clone could be programmed.
not yet
Scientist should not be able to clone humans because it's to difficult to tell the original human from the clone.
You can clone most organic compounds. So yes you can clone chickens. It has been done with cows, and certain parts of the human anatomy.
No scientist haven't yet cloned a human
Human Beings
mack truwilligar from Germany
A clone means a genetically identical copy of an organism, so can be any living thing potentially.
Financial, biological, or ethical?