answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, it is true that some of the smaller states without Western land claims, such as Maryland, would not ratify the Articles of Confederation unless the larger states such as New York and Virginia abandoned their claims to land in the Ohio River Vallery. Since the Articles had been written so that they had to be ratified, or passed, by all thirteen colonies before they became effective, and the colonies were eager to proceed as a confederation of states, the larger states eventually gave up their claims. This enabled the Confederation to resolve the disputes over conflicting claims to these western lands and to set up the "Northwest Ordinance" which provided for a system of organization and development for these lands.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

true i don know why do

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is it true that some smaller states would not ratify the articles of confederation until all states have up their claims to western lands?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Approval of the articles of confederation was delayed because of a dispute over?

state claims to western territories


Some small states without western land claims would not ratify the articles of confederation until all states gave up their claims to western lands?

False


What caused Maryland to approve the articles of confederation?

In 1781 Virginia gave up its claims. So Maryland agreed to sign the Articles....


Which state did not want to sign the Articles of Confederation if the others did not give up their land claims?

All states ratified the document


One obstacle to approve the articles of confederation?

The one obstacle to approving the Articles of Confederation was that some states refused to relinquish their claims west of the Appalachians. Doing this would have left the settlers in a financial limbo.


What were the delays in ratification for the Articles of Confederation?

Aside from the Revolutionary War being underway, the problem with the Articles was that they required unanimousratification, i.e. by all thirteen states. This was not accomplished until 1781.Most of the states did not agree with it unless they benefited from it, and they did not care how it affected the other states. Maryland especially wanted Virginia and New York to drop their claims to the Ohio Valley.


Why did some states refuse to ratify the articles of confederation?

Maryland had no Western lands, while all the other states did. They had nothing to gain from ratification, while all the other states had land to protect.


What were strengths of the articles of confederation?

While the Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses, it was able to accomplish much. It held the states together until the Constitution was written. It developed a fair policy for the development of the western lands. The states ceded their claims to the lands west of the Appalachians to the central government. This helped forge a feeling of national unity and congress under the Articles enacted laws to organize the western territories and admit new states on an equal footing with the original states. The Articles successfully negotiated a peace with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War. Congressional departments of Foreign Affairs, War, Marine, and Treasury were established, each under a secretary. This set the precedent for the creation of the executive cabinets under the Constitution. The Articles also encouraged cooperation among the states. Though not always successful, the Articles provided that each state gave "full faith and credit" to the legal acts of the other states.


How did the Articles of Confederation deal with Western land claims?

The issue over the western lands was solved under the Articles. The large states holding vast amounts of western land ceded the land to the government under the Articles so that all the states could share in the wealth of those lands. The Northwest Ordinances were passed that provided for the creation of equal, self governing states in the Northwest Territories and the newly created states would have the same rights and privileges as the original 13 states. Congress also provided for a survey of the western lands to prepare the land for sale to all.


What were some reasons for the opposition to the Articles of Confederation?

The Articles of Confederation was the name given to the agreement made by the 13 original states of the United States. The main reason for opposition was that it required the states to give up any claims they had to lands further west. Some also felt that the Articles were too weak to make the United States effective, as there was nothing in the document about governance in terms of who would be president and how the judicial system would be handled.


Why do you think the smaller states oppose the western claims of the larger states?

Because the larger states would have too much representation in the government. The smaller states were worried that they would loose their power in the government.


What were strengths of the confederation?

While the Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses, it was able to accomplish much. It held the states together until the Constitution was written. It developed a fair policy for the development of the western lands. The states ceded their claims to the lands west of the Appalachians to the central government. This helped forge a feeling of national unity and congress under the Articles enacted laws to organize the western territories and admit new states on an equal footing with the original states. The Articles successfully negotiated a peace with Great Britain ending the Revolutionary War. Congressional departments of Foreign Affairs, War, Marine, and Treasury were established, each under a secretary. This set the precedent for the creation of the executive cabinets under the Constitution. The Articles also encouraged cooperation among the states. Though not always successful, the Articles provided that each state gave "full faith and credit" to the legal acts of the other states.