It depends on the situation - both time and place.
For organization, read H.A. Simon, Administrative behavior
For public policy decision-making such as formation and formulation, lots of models are based on irrational model. Please read
Allison, Graham. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Boston: Little, Brown and company, 1971.
John W. Kingdon. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.
NY: HarperCollins College Publishers, 1995.
At least one of the factors has to be irrational.* An irrational number times ANY number (except zero) is irrational. * The product of two irrational numbers can be either rational or irrational.
Every irrational number can be represented by a non-terminating non-repeating decimal. Rounding this decimal representation to a suitable degree will provide a suitable approximation.
Not Suitable for Children - 2012 Not Suitable for Decision Making 1-3 was released on: USA: 1 April 2012
Sometimes the denominator is an irrational or complex number (depending on the level that you are at). Rationalising the denominator requires to multiply both the numerator and denominator of the fraction by a suitable number - usually the conjugate - so that when simplified, the denominator is rational - normally an integer.
A rational algebraic expression is the ratio of two polynomials, each with rational coefficients. By suitable rescaling, both the polynomials can be made to have integer coefficients.
The value of 8x + 3y depends on the values of x and y. With a suitable choice of x and y the result can be 11 or 85 - or indeed any other number: positive or negative, integer or fraction, rational or irrational, etc.
Marketing Research aid Marketing Managers in decision making . Discuss with suitable examples?
When an employer asks why you are suitable for a job with their company it is a chance for you to show why you are a good fit with the organization. You must be able to describe how your experience and background enables you to be a suitable candidate for the position.
You can round the decimal fraction to a suitable level of accuracy. Alternatively, you can convert the number to a rational fraction.
Every rational number has a decimal expansion that either terminates (like 42.23517) or repeats (like 26.1447676767676...)Pi's decimal expansion neither terminates nor repeatsHence, Pi cannot be rational.If we could prove the first two statements, this would constitute a proof that Pi is irrational, but most people cannot provide proof of either. Most proofs on this issue are quite technical, but I'm hoping to return to this question with a suitable answer soon.
Routine activity theory is convergence of motivated offender, suitable target and absence of a capable guardian. It relates to Rational choice in that they both explain crime and criminality.
Rationalization is the process of converting the irrational denominator of a given fraction into rational by multiplying and dividing by suitable terms. For example, consider, 2/3√2 Here the denominator is an irrational number to rationalize this fraction follow the steps: Find a number which on multiplying with denominator returns a rational number( here √2 * √2 will give 2 which is a rational number ). Multiply numerator and denominator with the number you just found {(2/3√2) becomes (2/3√2)(√2/√2) = 2√2/6) Now the rationalized result is 2√2/6