Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
the God-ordained supremacy of whites.
He believed that God had told him to end slavery.
Yes, they did. Whites believed that slaves were incapable of living on their own and taking care of themselves. Slave owners saw it as their duty to watch over the slaves.
They could do anything they wanted. Slaves were property and didn't have any rights or legal protection from laws or the government.
slavery was common in the bible
Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution
the different ways that slaveholders encouraged obedience from their slaves was to offer them more food and better living conditions.
Most were against it.
their slaves getting an education. apex
They was called slaveholders.
They wanted to keep freemen away from slaves. (Apex)
Yes, most of them did, but some slaves became slaveholders themselves.
the God-ordained supremacy of whites.
No, the 14th amendment abolished that.
The slaveholders would just starve them to death.
Slaveholders continually indoctrinated their slaves with the idea of the God-given supremacy of whites. However, many slave songs and sermons showed hope that God would free them from slavery.