Candidates need a majority of electoral votes to be elected. Because most states* award all of their electoral votes to the top candidate in that state, candidates do not need to win the national popular vote to win a majority of electoral votes. The result is that winning a few large population states (called swing states), even by a tiny margin, can guarantee election to the presidency. In 1876, 1888, and 2000, the winning candidate did not get the most popular votes nationwide.
No states share electoral votes. Each state has at least 3 or more.
By popular vote.
The Electoral College does not convene as one body but instead the electors meet in the state capitols of their respective states; most of these meetings of electors will happen in most of the states on December 15.
Ohio
It ensures that small staes have a voice in choosing the president. I know this because I just did it, in Apex.
When states with a combined total of at least 270 electoral votes enact the bill, the candidate with the most popular votes in all 50 states and DC would get the needed majority of 270+ electoral votes from the enacting states. The bill would thus guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes and the majority of Electoral College votes.
In all states but Nebraska and Maine, the winner of the popular vote gets all of that state's electoral votes. (Technically, the slate of electors pledged to the winning candidate is elected by the popular vote and these people go on to cast the state's electoral vote. )
Based on the 2010 Census, the 3 southern states with the most electoral votes are Texas 38, Florida 29 and Georgia 16.
Yes, in most states. Maine and Nebraska split their votes by congressional district.
The states with the largest number of electoral votes in 1828 were Pennsylvania 28, Virginia 24.and New York 20.
Florida California Illinois