Yes, the sentence is correct except the question mark should follow the word correct. Also you could say "was sorry he had thrown" rather than "he threw", as it is in the past tense. = The legal assistant was sorry that he threw the document away two weeks before the trial. =
Yes, the sentence is grammatically correct. The verb "threw" is correctly used in the past tense to indicate an action that occurred in the past.
I need to print out this document for my meeting tomorrow.
The sentence, John stands on the road wait for his mother, is grammatically wrong. You could use John stands on the road to wait for his mother, or John stands on the road. Wait for his mother.
The preposition is about; the object of the preposition is riots.
The complete subject in the sentence is "Two of his friends."
The people demanded a bill that would put the nullification process of a previous bill into effect. I'm not sure that's grammatically correct; you may want to google a different sentence.
This sentence is grammatically correct.
Yes, it is.
The sentence (not sentance) is grammatically correct
You had not taken that into account. Would be the grammatically correct version of that sentence.
No, the sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be written as "Here is my work schedule for this week."
Der Junge ist rothaarig is grammatically correct.
No, "firsts" is not grammatically correct. It should be "first."
yes
This sentence is not grammatically correct. For the sentence to be grammatically correct, the space between "in" and "to" would have to be removed. Therefore the sentence should read "They are into skating."
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
The sentence is not grammatically correct. It should be written as "Can you have the sheriff serve the subpoena?"
The sentence is grammatically correct.