answersLogoWhite
History, Politics & Society
Auto Insurance Claims
Philosophy and Philosophers
Income Taxes

Should individual claims of privacy be valued above claims of societal welfare?

108109110

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2011-02-09 06:59:28
Answer1) Yes personal privacy is one of the greates gifts of the constitution. I prefer privacy over security, however due to the current feelings in the U.S. and it's liberal leanings I doubt that there will ever be true personal privacy again.

2) Another view: One of the founding fathers (Benjamin Franklin) voiced the oft-quoted maxim: One who gives up liberty for security soon has neither.

Privacy is certainly of great value and is protected by various laws and statutes. However, it is not a concept with fixed and never changing parameters. Rather it varies in concept over time and with different perspectives. Therefore, the interpretation of privacy must be consideration a part of a never ending evolution of social perception, and rules relating to privacy -like the US Constitution- by necessity be a "living document".

The concept of privacy is currently being re-thought because identity theft and intellectual property rights are becoming more common. Government has an obligation to protect its citizenry but it also needs to violate citizens privacy in order to control society. The tug-of-war between control and freedom create ever-changing privacy parameters.

While the U.S. Constitution does addres search and siezure laws, grand jury indictments and general rights afforded to citizens of the United States and those who visit the country legally as well as illegally do not confuse these restraints on government as a right to privacy. We have a right to be secure in our papers, the right to practice religion, not to be imposed upon by housing military troops without compensation and a liberty clause that has been very broadly interpreted by courts as a quasi right to personal privacy. But there is no direct mention of outright privacy in the Constitution and those that characterize it as such are giving opinion, not facts.

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0

Your Answer

Related Questions


rights are assential for individual because the welfare of society/state depend upon the betterment of individual every state should creat an envoirment in which they can work for there welbeing.



No, there should not be a time limit on welfare. These people need to be able to live properly.


Hipaa is privacy rule. it protests individual privacy. regardless of race, origine, age etc. It should remains that way. look it on the bright sight without the hipaa law anyone can collect/request information about any sick child. I don't think it's fair at all to invade someone's privacy.


There are a great many people in the world who believe that welfare should be limited by time. Others do not believe this.


The information systems should be set up to protect privacy for individuals. The firewalls and all the protection should be in place.


Welfare money should be replaced with welfare coupons for necessities. If a person is too lazy to get a job death is still not an appropriate punishment for lazyness so they should still get welfare, but they should get the bare minimum. That will motivate the vast majority of people, since most people aren't happy with the bare minimum.


The welfare of the people should be an important concern for any government.


The question of whether someone can be legally filmed or not generally depends on the student's "reasonable expectation of privacy".If the student is being filmed while in public, or in a common area, the student should not expect much privacy, thus the video is not in violation of any rights or statutes.If the student is being filmed in a private location, like inside their home, the situation differs. An individual DOES have an expectation of privacy within their home, thus the film would be violating the student's privacy.So, to determine whether or not it is legal within your specific case, you should consider:Where was the video taken?Does the student have an expectation of privacy in this location?What is the scope of this privacy?


Societal marketing concept is concept that holds that companies should provide good and services base on the needs and wants of their customers and the society at large.


It is important for people to learn that other people need privacy. It is also important that they need privacy too.Students need to learn what privacy means, and how to respect another person's boundaries. Where do one person's rights end and another's begin? How do you know if you have overstepped the boundaries and invaded someone's privacy, and what should you do if someone invades your privacy?Each of these are important things we should all know about privacy.


The key issues involved with student privacy include treating their personal information as confidential. Some of the steps that should be taken to ensure privacy is to not issue their information to a third party without their consent.


privacy is 1) The right to be let alone; (2) in insurance contexts, the right to fair personal information practices. I think that privacy should be respected


website privacy refers to a variety of factors, techniques and technologies used to protect sensitive and private data, communications, and preferences. It is also known as Internet privacy or online privacy.


Sure, it will actually help to made them feel as a worthy contributing individual to society and not just receiving a handout, having said that I do not believe it should apply to elderly people and children.


No, its an invasion of your privacy


as a medical biller what steps should you take if you believe a patients privacy has been compromised


If safety measures are properly applied, they should improve or increase employee welfare.


No,thats like saying since you on welfare you cant buy a nice iphone that people that arent on welfare sould be able to buy.


no because its a violation of privacy


According to Taoism, how should the individual live?


He should have made the welfare of others his business.



That depends on what you believe is acceptable. Most people would disagree. Every person needs a degree of privacy. If you believe he is invading your privacy, then no. He should not be at all. He should not. But, if he does it is certain that he doesn't trust you.


The government already supports animal welfare and enacted the Animal Welfare act in 1966. The Act sets standards for animal care in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.



Copyright ยฉ 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.