0
Yes , because teenagers should no better ... & they should know right from wrong .
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Yes, teenagers should be held responsible for their actions, but within a framework that considers their age and developmental stage. Providing guidance, support, and appropriate consequences can help teenagers learn from their mistakes and grow into responsible adults.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the term for the process whereby a person is held responsible for the actions of a business?
The term for the process whereby a person is held responsible for the actions of a business is "liability." This can include legal, financial, or ethical responsibilities for the business's actions.
At what age can a minor be held legally responsible for their actions?
The age at which a minor can be held legally responsible for their actions varies by jurisdiction. In many places, this age is typically around 18 years old. However, some jurisdictions may set the age lower for certain types of criminal offenses.
Who is responsible when a child or young adult commons a crime?
When a child or young adult commits a crime, they are generally held responsible for their actions. However, depending on the circumstances and the age of the individual, parents or legal guardians may also be held responsible for the child's actions. Additionally, the justice system may offer rehabilitation programs for juvenile offenders to help them reintegrate into society.
What makes man responsible for his actions?
Man is responsible for his actions due to his ability to make conscious choices and decisions based on his beliefs, values, and intentions. This capacity for rational thought and moral agency allows individuals to understand the consequences of their actions and to be held accountable for their behavior. Personal responsibility emerges from the autonomy and free will that individuals possess in determining their actions.
When is vicarious liability imposed?
Vicarious liability is imposed when one party is held responsible for the actions of another party, typically an employer for the actions of an employee. This is usually based on the legal relationship between the two parties and the principle that the employer benefits from the actions of the employee.
Can a state be held responsible for the actions of their court?
No, they cannot.
Should drug users in the US be held responsible for drug related violence that occurs in other places?
One should only be responsible for one's own actions so the answer is "NO".
Should you give Congress the benefit of the doubt?
Congress should be held accountable for their actions, no matter what. They are responsible for legislating the laws that affect our daily lives, and should be held to a higher standard than the public.
Should criminals be held morally responsible for their actions?
Only their God, or Supreme Being (if they believe in one) can pass that judgment on them. Only if they feel they should be.
A commander may not be held responsible for?
It is much easier and simpler to answer in the reverse manner:They ARE responsible for: directly - for their own actions and indirectly - for the official actions of their subordinates.
To what extent should we hold mentally ill people responsible for their crimes?
Each person should be held responsible and accountable for their actions to the extent and parameters of a) comprehension b) intention and c) ability to repeat the action.
Why should gun sellers be held responsible for the crime the buyer has done?
There is NO good reason they should be held responsible.
Should celebrities be held responsible for their actions in the public eye?
yes they should because they are people too just like everyone else. Just because they are more well known than we are,they should still be held acountable for the wrong things that they do.
Who was the man who stared World War 2?
No one man can be held responsible for starting WW2. The leaders of each respective nation may be held responsible for those actions.
Who may be held responsible for the actions of an agent regardless of the agents contract with the company?
The company (the insurer) may be held responsible for the action of its agents regardless of the agents' contracts with the company.
Should tobacco companies not be held responsible?
They should not be held responsible as it is people's choice to continue to smoke despite all the health warnings.
What is the term for the process whereby a person is held responsible for the actions of a business?
The term for the process whereby a person is held responsible for the actions of a business is "liability." This can include legal, financial, or ethical responsibilities for the business's actions.
