The UN has failed to intervene in international problems in an effective manner. It would seem unwise to increase the UN's role in such matters.
The League of Nations was an international organization, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, created after the First World War to provide a forum for resolving international disputes.
These border disputes become more costly each day.
The Court of International Trade was established in 1980 to replace the old United States Customs Court. The Customs Court was absorbed into the new court, which expanded its jurisdiction beyond customs matters to include international trade disputes more broadly.
The government shouldn't intervene in resource allocation. The idea that politicians without a profit motive (usually with their own reelection as a motive) could possibly reliably allocate resources more effectively than private entrepreneurs is the height of hubris.
to provide more competition
An intervening applicant refers to a rule in the US court system that says that an applicant can intervene in one of two situations. Either a) the applicant has the right to intervene when a federal statute gives the applicant the right to intervene unconditionally or b) the applicant can intervene if they have an interest of some kind that relates to the property or subject of the lawsuit. See the related links for more information.
False
The primary reason for government to intervene in a free enterprise economy is simple. The government deemed something to be harmful or deconstructive.
They initially fought for more land to support an expanding population. Their succes gained them allies, who encouraged them to intervene in other disputes. This kept them expanding, and their military success and knack of governing and controlling others kept them expanding. They had losses, but these were outweighed by their successes. Good at fighting, good at organising war alliances, good at governing the defeated.
"The Specificity Rule states that it is usually more efficient to use the government policy tool that acts as directly as possible on the source of distortion separating social benefits or costs: identify the source of the problem and intervene at the source (Pugel, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS 14ed, p204)."
There are loads of international conservations such as WWF, RSPCA, Conservation International, IUCN, Wildlife Conservation Society, World Land Trust. There are lots more on google just type in International Conservations and it should come up with some conservations. :)
That probably depends on the length of time you plan to be abroad. If a year or more, then international health insurance should probably be something you should consider. If just for a short semester, I would recommend against it.