answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Second amendment should not be abolished . The right to bear arms is the shield and sword of the constitution. Limiting who "legally" owns a gun is not gonna stop crime or gun violence .Criminals will find a way to receive and use guns just as they do now. Not only that but what gives a foreign country the right to tell us as free people who does and does not have the right to protect ourselves and our families. If passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

1.Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

2.Confiscate and destroy all "unauthorized" civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

3.Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull -- one single "bang" manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

4.Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

5.In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Should the second amendment be abolish?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp