Since this is looking for an opinion, there are bound to be several responses:
View 1
No. While on paper it sounds good to make the Middle East a nuclear free zone, it would not actually deter any of the states seeking nuclear weapons. Additionally, it would lead to Middle Eastern states being far more secretive about their nuclear capabilities.
IsraelMaybe Iran, but if so it has not been tested
The use of these weapon brought about peace in the East against Japan and was the conclusion of hostilities in WW2 .
The Greater Middle East includes all of the countries of the Middle East plus North Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Cyprus, and parts of the Horn of Africa.
Probably from the Middle-East, and from the Middle-East to Africa.
To be honest , Vietnam is not Part of The Middle East. Vietnam is part of East and Southeast Asia.
Israel is the only nation in the Middle East known to have nuclear weapons.
Nothing
iran is trying.
Paul Jabber has written: 'A Nuclear Middle East'
IsraelMaybe Iran, but if so it has not been tested
Yes; it is written as Middle East when you use it.
The use of these weapon brought about peace in the East against Japan and was the conclusion of hostilities in WW2 .
Shortly, Israel .Turkey has the largest army in the middle east but in Strategy, technology, nuclear, Israel has advantage on any country in the middle east .
C. Middle East and northern Africa
Disregard that liberal pigs answer . The war in the Middle East should continue hunt down and kill those Raghead terrorists.
it is, obviously in the middle of the direction east.
the term middle east means the middle of the east.