0
Strengths and weaknesses of the US government under Articles of Confedeation how were these weaknesses dealt during the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
The government only had one branch.
Kamron Roberts
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThey motivated early U.S. leaders to establish a stronger central government whose power was checked by the Bill of Rights.
Adella Fedarinenko
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoThe biggest weaknesses of the government under the Articles of Confederation originated from the lack of any executive power or central authority. There was no centralization of defense, taxation, imports, etc.
The strength of this form is that it preserved states' rights. Each state had the ability to control its own affairs as necessary.
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago1. No tax power 2.no power to regulate trade. 3.no powere to enforce the trade 4.9/13 states in congress to approve all laws 5.all 13 states must approve amendments
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
For what purpose did the delegates to the constitutional convention originally meet?
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention originally met to reform the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were the guidelines for the first national government of the United States. However, they were weak and did not give enough power to the national government so that it was able to hold all of the separate states together. That is why they wanted to reform it. When they started the convention, they discovered that since the Articles of Confederation were so fundamentally flawed it would be better to just come up with an entirely new form of government. So they created the Constitution of the United States of America, which is still used today.
What did the founders discuss when drafting the constitution?
The structure of the federal government was discussed at the Constitutional Convention, along with how power should be shared between the states and the national government. Another significant issue was how representation in Congress should be determined.
Who opposed the Constitutional Convention and did not attend?
Rhode Island refused to send a delegate to the Philadelphia (or Constitutional) Convention in 1787. Patrick Henry, who would have been Rhode Island's delegate, was suspicious of the real purpose of the meeting and did not attend.The decision was not made in opposition to the Constitution itself, because the US Constitution hadn't been proposed, let alone written, yet. The First Continental Congress had authorized the 1787 Convention to allow delegates address weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, but many people, like Patrick Henry, feared the proposed solutions would shift power away from the states and to the central government (which is exactly what happened).Patrick Henry(apex)
Why was the purpose of the Philadelphia Convention changed after Congress met?
Congress realized the Articles of Confederation were not working for the people of the United States, so they called for a Constitutional Convention to revise the Articles. They hoped that it would be possible to revise the Articles of Confederation to better unite the country through legal means. However, once the convention began, it became clear that the Articles were beyond repair, so the Constitution was created to replace them.
What were two weaknesses in the new national government?
The government has no powers over commerce or trade!
Strengths and weaknesses of the us government under articles of confedeation how were these weaknesses dealt during the constiutional convention of 1787?
DFJHEHHGHJKLS
What states took the lead in changing the government Due to the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation?
The states that took the lead in advocating for a change in government due to the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation were Virginia and Massachusetts. Virginia was the first to call for a convention to revise the Articles, which eventually led to the Constitutional Convention. Massachusetts also played a significant role by proposing a series of reforms to address the weaknesses in the existing government.
What were two weaknesses of the national government under the article of confederation that led to the constitutional convention?
The country had no solid way of keeping order and balance. The United States was also very broke, and couldn’t properly get money because there were no taxes.
For what purpose did the delegates to the constitutional convention originally meet?
The delegates to the Constitutional Convention originally met to reform the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation were the guidelines for the first national government of the United States. However, they were weak and did not give enough power to the national government so that it was able to hold all of the separate states together. That is why they wanted to reform it. When they started the convention, they discovered that since the Articles of Confederation were so fundamentally flawed it would be better to just come up with an entirely new form of government. So they created the Constitution of the United States of America, which is still used today.
Did the first government of the US have a President and Supreme Court?
No. The first US government, organized under the Articles of Confederation, lacked both Executive (President) and Judicial (Court) Branches. These were considered two of the weaknesses the Second Continental Congress authorized delegates to the Philadelphia Convention (now called the Constitutional Convention) to fix. They "fixed" the problem by creating the Constitution, the foundation of the second official United States government.
What did the founders discuss when drafting the constitution?
The structure of the federal government was discussed at the Constitutional Convention, along with how power should be shared between the states and the national government. Another significant issue was how representation in Congress should be determined.
What was the purpose of the constisutional convention of 1787?
The original plan for the 1787 Philadelphia Convention (later called the Constitutional Convention) was to revise the Articles of Confederation, but many delegates sought to eliminate the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation by creating an entirely new document.
Four miracles of constitutional convention?
The Constitutional Convention, like many major assemblies in history, had many miracles attached to it. It was a miracle in itself that the Constitution has endured enough to allow a nation to survive and prosper as much as it did. Four major weaknesses that were overcome are miracles in themselves: the idea that nine out of the 13 states had to agree on sensitive and controversial issues, all 13 states had to agree to amendments, the national government was still in its infancy and weak, and treaties with foreign nations had to undergo the approval of all 13 states.
What was roger Sherman's opinion on the articles of confederation?
he thought that the Articles of Confederation were fine and were decently handled ^^ his view at first. then when he got to the constitutional convention, he saw the flaws/weaknesses in the articles and took on a more anti-fed view.
What challenges did Constitutional Convention delegates face?
The debate between the north and south about slaves as voters.
Who opposed the Constitutional Convention and did not attend?
Rhode Island refused to send a delegate to the Philadelphia (or Constitutional) Convention in 1787. Patrick Henry, who would have been Rhode Island's delegate, was suspicious of the real purpose of the meeting and did not attend.The decision was not made in opposition to the Constitution itself, because the US Constitution hadn't been proposed, let alone written, yet. The First Continental Congress had authorized the 1787 Convention to allow delegates address weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation, but many people, like Patrick Henry, feared the proposed solutions would shift power away from the states and to the central government (which is exactly what happened).Patrick Henry(apex)
Why did convention delegates decide t keep the proceedings secret?
The Constitutional Convention exceeded its authority in writing a new Constitution and it was feared that if deliberations on a new Constitution were to be found out, the Convention would be dissolved. The Convention was supposed to work out amendments to the Articles of Confederation that would keep that document in effect but improve on its inherent weaknesses. It was soon apparent to the delegates that saving the Articles of Confederation by amendment was hopeless, so they began to create a new form of government entirely. This was a task, the delegates had no authority to do.
